FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Forest View

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

As a reputable law firm, Carlson Bier takes an assertive stance in representing those injured in construction site accidents across Forest View. We understand the devastating impact such incidents can have on victims and their families; thus, our skilled lawyers are dedicated to securing maximum compensation for your distress. If you’ve been victim of a construction site accident near Forest View – whether it involved faulty equipment, disregard for safety codes or negligence – our attorneys will dedicate themselves wholly to protect your rights. Moreover, at Carlson Bier we not only accomplish this through relentless litigation but also by handling all insurance negotiations proactively on behalf of our clients from Forest View area. Indeed, having set high standards in personal injury law adhered through honesty and integrity, we deem nurturing client-lawyer relationships crucial to claim successful outcomes. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing unrivaled expertise coupled with compassionate service tailor-made to suit individual needs following any type of construction related accident suffered around Forest View community. Engage us today; let’s diligently work together towards justice delivery and financial recovery warranted by Illinois law.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Forest View Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we are committed to ensuring that when personal injury strikes, you are not left in a quandary seeking justice. Our focus is particularly on cases related to construction site accidents throughout Illinois – an area where negligence often leads to dire consequences.

Construction site accidents involve a variety of scenarios that could lead to severe injury or fatality. These can include falling from scaffolds and roofs, electrocution, machinery-related injuries among many others. Our goal is always to ensure the victims of these unfortunate incidents get adequate legal representation and as such obtain the rightful compensation they deserve. As a victim or family member who has been affected by a construction accident, understanding your rights better helps put you in control instead of being at the mercy of complex legal processes.

Highlighted key areas surrounding Construction Site Accidents include:

– Employer’s Liability: Employers have an utmost responsibility for maintaining safe working conditions for their workers. When there is neglect in providing safety precautions resulting in accidents, employers can be held accountable.

– Employee’s Rights: Employees should be knowledgeable about their rights within the workplace regarding safety laws and regulations; ignorance sometimes causes vulnerability towards exploitation.

– Types of Injuries: Should range from physical (bruises, fractures), mental (post-traumatic stress disorder), even fatality highlighting the severity involved with construction site accidents

– Compensation Claims: As victims or close relatives left behind after fatal incidents understand what payouts might entail e.g., medical bills coverages, loss wage compensation etc.

Operating with integrity and professionalism, our team at Carlson Bier adeptly navigates through each case’s complexities ensuring everyone stands on solid ground regarding their rights under Illinois State Law governing construction site accidents.

The notion that only workers actively engaged on-site during an incident can claim damages is misleading; bystanders injured due to unsafe practices employed on construction sites also have a right to seek remuneration for their suffering.

Being aware of your rights after a construction accident, it is also important to highlight statute limitations in filing legal claims. In Illinois, personal injury cases have a two-year limitation period; hence the necessity for immediate action, especially when severe injuries requiring expensive medical procedures are involved.

The sheer force or impact of these accidents can potentially diminish a victim’s quality of life permanently – making “pain and suffering” compensation a focal point in their lawsuit.

Our attorneys at Carlson Bier acknowledge this; we handle each case individually offering personalized guidance – consequently easing victims’ burden during such trying times.

Possessing an unmatched reputation due to our commitment towards client satisfaction underpins the success rate associated with Carlson Bier. Our lawyers delve into understanding your case thoroughly before exploring all feasible legal pathways available aiming for the best possible outcome.

Knowing that time is essential following such accidents, Carlson Bier offers prospective clients free consultations providing the first step towards claiming rightly deserved compensation.

No upfront fees levied unless we secure a fair settlement indicating our full faith working on your claim allowing you ease fretting over finances while focusing on wholesome recovery steps instead. With knowledgeable personal injury attorneys that empathize honestly regarding your plight – facing/overcoming difficulties arising post-accident becomes less daunting more manageable proving our unwavering dedication ensuring justice prevails.

So why wait? If you or someone dear has fallen prey to any construction site mishap, keep procrastination at bay—click on the button below today for that deserving step forward towards ascertaining what your case worth might be with experts from Carlson Bier having your back every step of the way!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forest View Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Forest View

Areas of Practice in Forest View

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying professional legal help for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Mishaps

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Providing adept legal services for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Damages

Focused on delivering specialized legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to defending persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440