FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Galena

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you find yourself in the unenviable position of dealing with a products liability claim in Galena, it is crucial that you have a proficient advocate representing your interests. That’s where Carlson Bier will serve you best. With extensive experience handling complex Product Liability claims, we offer comprehensive knowledge and expertise to vigorously protect our clients’ rights while seeking maximum compensation for their loss or injury caused by defective goods or inadequate warning labels. Our commitment to superior client service has earned us an esteemed reputation in Illinois among those who confront serious product-related issues.

Balancing compassion with strategic tenacity, Carlson Bier adeptly navigates complex legal landscapes directed by this particular area of law. Ill-preparedness carries no weight when battling manufacturers who fall short on their duty of care – recruiting a skilled Products Liability attorney like ourselves ensures your claim gets the attention it deserves and progresses assertively towards rightful resolution.

Trust us; while some firms may boast exemplary results, few rival the consistent success rate that investors expect from Carlson Bier—the reliable choice for full-scale products liability action through every stage of litigation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Galena Illinois

Serving Illinois with dedication and passion, Carlson Bier is at the forefront of personal injury litigation, particularly in upholding victims’ rights against negligent or irresponsible product manufacturers. When you purchase a commodity—be it an automobile, household appliance or pharmaceutical—you expect that rigorous testing safeguards have been emplaced to ensure your safety. This trust can often be broken by companies that disregard their duty towards consumers leading to serious injuries or catastrophic results.

Often misunderstood and sometimes overlooked, Products Liability is a complex area of law with its caveat emptor principles (“buyer beware”). However, our team at Carlson Bier works tirelessly to advocate for those who suffer from defective products. Our commitment lies in not only representing affected individuals professionally but educating them about these legal concepts.

Firstly, we want you to understand the three major types of product defects: manufacturing defects occur during the assembly process; design defects exist even before production – implicating the entire line may be faulty; and finally warning failures where risks are not sufficiently communicated by manufacturers.

Next, it’s crucial to highlight how important time factors are when mounting a case concerning faulty products. Statutes of Limitation set specific deadlines beyond which filing lawsuits might not be possible – generally two years post discovering harm caused by a defective product in Illinois.

Moreover, understand the dynamics between strict liability versus negligence claims: Strict liability allows you to hold manufacturers accountable without proving intentional negligence if used as designed; however under negligence claim premise requires demonstrating lack of sufficient care on part of manufacturer contributing to consumer injury.

The complexity surrounding Products Liability indicates why professional representation aids effectively maximizing compensation redress through meticulous analysis aptitude that distinguishes us: Carlson Bier’s empathetic attention complemented by thorough knowledge leverages your fight for deserved justice against powerful corporations.

We facilitate negotiation based resolutions minimizing stress associated typically with exhaustive court proceedings along offering unrivaled expertise when trials become unavoidable – conducting articulate compelling presentations specifically tailored showcasing unique situations each client faces.

By selecting Carlson Bier you’re choosing firm that’s personal, persistent and diligent – ensuring your needs remain cornerstone of our operations. We help navigate confusing legal terminologies/rules, shoulder settlement discussions workload entrusted in delivering necessary compensation alleviating financial strain caused aptly due defective products-related injuries.

Given the difficult journey ahead involving physical recovery minus potential loss of income or career opportunities – it becomes indispensable for victims to approach a reputable law firm such as ours to handle their product liability cases with utmost professionalism, compassion and attention to detail.

Through our comprehensive understanding of relevant laws complemented by commitment bringing justice at forefront developing strategic representation approaches, we’ve successfully helped numerous clients achieve satisfactory outcomes while providing insightful education about this unique branch of law enhancing informed decisions making process irrespective situation complexity tackles.

Among several considerations when seeking legal assistance is assessing lawyer’s ability effectively presenting claims court/jury particularly products liability intricacies muddled interplay differing laws across states – exactly where proficiency lies.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves in upholding integrity transparency intertwined strategic advice garnered years remarkable experience untangling complex architectonic Products Liability legal formation handling multi-dimensional aspects associated leading profound impactful resolutions restoring deserved normalcy post unfortunate episodes prompted by defective commodities devastating effect safety well-being consumers.

Our dedication transcends beyond simply fighting on behalf invoking unmatched competence affirming right recipients appreciate underlying complexities thereby strengthening faith bolstering unyielding spirit striving restorative equilibrium through targeted judicial recourse.

We invite you now to explore further what sets us apart: click below learn more about realistic prospects scenarios taking into account provided details relating your case. It’s not just consultation; it’s an empowering conversation steering towards rightful reparation shedding light possibilities otherwise elusive without guided professional expertise. Allow us to evaluate your case positively affecting life trajectory amidst adversity presence faulty product aftermath offering constructive pathway ensuring assertive stand under prevailing laws Illinois. Click the button below now–let’s figure out how much your case is worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Galena Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Galena

Areas of Practice in Galena

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying expert legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing specialist legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Adept in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Incident

Extending specialist legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Building Incidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Focused on offering dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Specializing in assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440