FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Glenwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

As the complexities of construction site accidents steadily increase, individuals in Glenwood require steadfast legal support that truly understands their concerns. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in – a dedicated law firm with unrivaled expertise in addressing personal injury caused by construction site mishaps. Carlson Bier’s tenacious and seasoned attorneys work rigorously to provide you comprehensive representation. They navigate intricate laws to seek substantial compensation to offset your heavy medical bills and lost wages, thus alleviating the devastating financial burden often associated with such incidents. Their robust knowledge combined with formidable litigation skills positions this distinguished team as an obvious choice for anyone grappling with construction accident matters in Illinois state jurisdiction areas. The assurance from dealing with Carlson Bier is that they are not merely lawyers; indeed, they’re partners serving justice one victory at a time! Trusting us instills confidence that your case will be handled meticulously while offering personalized attention it deserves because at Carlson Bier, YOU matter most!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Glenwood Illinois

In the state of Illinois, the law firm you can trust to look out for your rights and protect your interests is Carlson Bier. With an esteemed reputation as top-notch personal injury attorneys, we possess vast experience in handling cases that pertain to construction site accidents. Our primary objective as your legal representation is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter to add value and ensure effective communication.

Construction site accidents involve situations where workers or bystanders are injured due to hazards present on a building or demolition work area. Fall from heights, electrocution, injury by falling objects, cave-in incidents are examples of these typical hazards. The aftermath often results in dire consequences such as muscular injuries, fractures, spinal cord injuries and even death. As alarming as these incidents may be, it’s critical for victims understand their rights under Illinois law.

• You have the right to financial compensation for medical bills incurred as a result of your injuries.

• Your loss of wages due to inability to work during recovery should also be compensated.

• If any permanent impairment occurred due to the accident, you’re entitled additional compensation beyond just immediate medical cost reimbursement.

• Claims can also be made for psychological stress endured during this problematic period.

The party responsible could range from employers who failed safeguarding thorough safety measures at the workplace – negligent coworkers or machinery manufacturers whose faulty equipment became a cause of the accident.

Indeed comprehending laws surrounding construction site accidents isn’t always straightforward; thus specialized help is quite essential in many scenarios. For instance- Consider ‘Worker’s Compensation Insurance’ which most companies carry for accident-related injuries suffered by their employees while on duty – It reimburses healthcare costs and covers some percentage of lost income. However it generally waives off employee’s right sue their employer for negligence! Are all avenues now closed then? Not necessarily; third-party lawsuits (different than ‘Workers Comp’) might still be feasible against someone other than employer whose negligence caused your injury – like a sub-contractor or machinery manufacturer. For every unique situation we, at Carlson Bier, can provide counsel and determine the most effective legal recourse to ensure maximum compensation.

It is of utmost importance that potential victims remember a key aspect – the statute of limitations in Illinois for personal injury lawsuits is two years from the date of accident. Therefore promptness initiating legal proceedings could be crucial as this has significant implications on your right receive compensation.

The team at Carlson Bier believes in standing up against powerful entities that may seek to deny you fair compensation. Our proficient attorneys aggressively use their decades worth experience and extensive knowledge Illinois law all while maintaining an empathetic approach towards our clients’ predicaments.

We understand a construction site accident has likely caused enough strain; hence we assure you we work diligently mitigating any further stress. Allowing us help means benefiting from personalized strategies tailored each individual client’s needs, zealous advocacy before court if necessary, securing expert testimonials, meticulous evidence collection and scrutiny to build a compelling case.

In the face of intense opposition or complex laws, we refuse flinch! We will fight doggedly till end achieving justice for our clients ensuring they receive rightful reparation for their losses.

If you find yourself grappling with aftermath of a construction site accident desiring capable representation, look no further than Carlson Bier! Don’t let this taxing phase overwhelm you; allow renowned personal injury lawyers confront these problems head-on on your behalf protecting your rights while seeking deserved recompense!

How much might your case be worth? Well … don’t just mull over it; resolve this uncertainty once and for all.

Are you curious about how much financial relief may potentially be within reach given particulars of your case?

Click on the button below! Allow seasoned experts do what they excel at- so that you can focus on recovering instead!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glenwood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Glenwood

Areas of Practice in Glenwood

Cycling Collisions

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing skilled legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Professional in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for harms and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440