FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Golconda

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate events such as construction site accidents occur in Golconda, it’s crucial to have the right representation. At Carlson Bier, we understand how devastating these incidents can be and strive to provide legal aid that prioritizes your needs and rights. As esteemed personal injury lawyers specializing in construction site accident cases, we are well versed with Illinois law and dedicated to seeking justice for our clients. Our team goes above and beyond to investigate each incident thoroughly, acquire necessary evidence, negotiate with insurance companies or take the case promptly to court if need be. If you’re looking for a compassionate advocate who will fight tooth and nail for your cause – consider Carlson Bier. We aren’t just lawyers; we are your partners in this challenging journey towards reclaiming normalcy after an accident has disrupted life’s flow unfairly . Remember – although accidents happen without warning, you don’t have to face them alone- not when you’ve got Carlson Bier at your side!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Golconda Illinois

Expertise and value are at the basis of exemplary legal representation, and that’s what you’ll find at Carlson Bier. Our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys understands how debilitating construction site accidents can be. This type of accident often results in catastrophic injuries or fatalities and navigating through the complex, multifaceted process of claiming compensation is often challenging.

Regardless of the nature and severity of your injury, our legal prowess will guide you every step of the way. We specialize in comprehensive legal services for victims suffering from a variety of accidents attributed to construction sites. Sometimes these involve hazardous equipment, falls from great heights, being struck by falling objects or inadequate safety measures. Whatever form it takes, a construction site accident carries significant financial implications apart from obvious physical pain and emotional trauma.

What differentiates us further is an insightful understanding that not all construction site accidents are alike. Varying circumstances translate into divergent legal challenges and solutions:

• Workers’ Compensation Claims often arise when employees suffer an injury at their workplace during work hours.

• Personal Injury Lawsuits typically become relevant if a party separate from the victim’s employer – termed third parties – causes harm.

• Product Liability Cases may transpire should faulty equipment result in accidental injuries.

• Wrongful Death Suits are sadly necessary when irreplaceable loss occurs due to negligence or recklessness.

At Carlson Bier, we’re equipped with experience across all these areas; having successfully secured rightful compensation for countless clients who’ve faced similar predicaments after Construction Site Accidents.

Each case we undertake receives sharp attention embracing thoroughness – ensuring no stone is left unturned. Pursuing potential claims against liable entities which might include contractors/sub-contractors guilty of occupational safety hazards; human resources departments lacking cloned training protocols key during emergencies; manufacturers installing flawed equipment leading to unintended incidents.

Carlson Bier prides itself on our skilled negotiation expertise underpinned by superlative courtroom competence. Often, we’ve ensured clients achieve fair and adequate settlements outside court confines, saving crucial time and resources in the process which can be redirected towards healing. However, if justice demands a courtroom battle – rest assured our team is comprehensively trained to represent your interests fearlessly.

At Carlson Bier, integrity encapsulates our essence. As such, you barely lift a finger while we tirelessly work on your behalf so that you may focus entirely on recuperating. Our fee structure also mirrors this commitment – not demanding payment unless successful recovery of compensation occurs.

Indeed, the law intricacies around construction site accidents are no less complex than the accident repercussions themselves; especially under Illinois jurisdiction where unique state-specific regulations must be keenly adhered to. More reasons why having dependable legal counsel like us becomes invaluable.

It goes without saying that every case varies vastly based on its peculiarity. Alternatively said: don’t trust an online damage calculator for accurate evaluations – consult us instead. Curious about what recompense your case could attract? Don’t second guess any longer! Click on the button below for comprehensive individualized assessment by one of our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier. You won’t regret choosing us as partners in pursuing due rights after your unfortunate construction site accident.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Golconda Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Golconda

Areas of Practice in Golconda

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing adept legal assistance for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering professional legal support for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal help to clients affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents get fair compensation for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Extending expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Building Accidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Expert in delivering compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440