FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Grayville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can be a life-altering experience, demanding physical resilience and mental fortitude. Navigating the aftermath shouldn’t require your legal bravery too. If you’re embarking on this complex journey in Grayville, allow Carlson Bier to steer you toward justice. As an esteemed Illinois law firm specializing in personal injuries, they bring vast expertise specifically around spinal cord injuries cases — understanding intimately their profound implications for quality of life adjustments and requisite medical outlays.

Carlson Bier champions your rights assertively while lending compassionate support during hard times. Clients are not just case numbers; they’re part of our motivation to persistently fight for optimal resolutions that reflect their ultimate wellbeing genuinely; including comprehensive compensation pertinent to ongoing care costs or lost earnings.

With Carlson Bier at helm, expect meticulous attention to each detail that shapes up as strong evidence required for a favorable verdict. Navigate this tumultuous period with the aid of professional attorneys who persistently strive towards safeguarding your interests – resorting only to strategic actions engineered towards maximum effectiveness within legal boundaries – making them worthy confidants amid turbulent times caused by spinal cord injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Grayville Illinois

Providing professional expertise and dynamic representation, Carlson Bier is committed to advocating for victims of spinal cord injuries in Illinois. Our accomplished personal injury attorney group has a profound comprehension of the complexities associated with these medical scenarios and their legal implications. Essential knowledge about spinal cord injuries will empower you as we navigate your case together towards just compensation.

Spinal cord injuries often result from traumatic events such as car accidents, falls, sports-related incidents or violent encounters. They involve damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at its end, potentially causing permanent changes to strength, sensation, and other body functions below the level of injury.

There are two main types of spinal cord injuries: complete and incomplete. A complete injury signifies loss of all sensory function below the level of injury while an incomplete one implies that some functionality exists below this point—a fact not widely recognized by many victims who feel helpless post-accident.

The consequences of these injuries can be severe and life-altering:

• Loss or decrease in mobility

• Reduced sensation

• Difficulty breathing without support

• Problems controlling bladder and bowel function

These drastic physiological changes often lead to financial strain due to ongoing medical costs, lost wages from inability to work consistently or altogether, emotional distress caused by dramatic shifts in lifestyle. Understanding these implications magnifies our passion at Carlson Bier; we want each victim we represent to attain maximum recovery under Illinois law.

Notably too is the time sensitivity on personal injury cases which typically expires after two years following accident’s occurrence under Illinois’ statute limitations—an aspect keenly understood by us at Carlson Bier hence our dedication driven swift action per each client’s unique context so they don’t miss out on potential compensation window.

We take pride in offering personalized attention throughout your case—conducting a thorough investigation considering any possible contributing factors playing role in accident severity–from reporting delays through examining scene details minutely–consequently constructing most strong possible evidence arsenal against defenders.

Our duty at Carlson Bier extends beyond the courtroom. We aim to foster a community wherein victims of spinal cord injuries find accommodation in information, support, and appropriate legal representation. Having us on your side means navigating this life change with an ally committed to advocating for your rights.

If you or someone you know has suffered from a spinal cord injury as a result of another’s negligence, wrongful act, or failure to act; we urge you not to bear the burdens alone—lost wages, hefty medical expenses and rehabilitation costs. Let our expert attorneys group at Carlson Bier be your voice in fighting for compensation so that focus remains on what matters: your recovery.

Indeed at Carlson Bier,* value means more than winning cases—it signifies reduced burdens for injury victims agonizing over challenging aftermaths hence personal investment into each individual case by our well-versed team dictating successful resolution via their solid experience within Illinois’ complex legal system structuring strong defense lines towards ensuring justice prevails.

Take initiative today! Learn about how Carlson Bier can help navigate through the complexities following Spinal Cord Injuries*. Discover your potential settlement valuation by clicking on the button below—that next step forward towards regaining some semblance of normalcy post such catastrophic events. Don’t let daunting implications interfere with securing rightful compensation standing up against those accountable—the journey back starts here; triumphant with Carlson Bier having your back relentlessly advocating on behalf of those who’ve fallen victim to life-altering circumstances due any negligent parties throughout Illinois uphold duty providing outstanding representation clients deserve within legalese maze.*

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Grayville

Areas of Practice in Grayville

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Giving skilled legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Slip Injuries

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Harms

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents obtain just payout for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Delivering adept legal support for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to offering professional legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and skilled legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to defending patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​