...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Harrison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you been a victim of a Pedestrian Accident in Harrison or its vicinity? Choose Carlson Bier – your reliable advocates focused on your rights and the pursuit of justice. As personal injury attorneys with extensive experience handling Pedestrian accident cases, we understand the distress these events can cause. Our team’s comprehensive approach encompasses professional medical evaluations, thorough investigations to determine liability, and ongoing support throughout claims procedures. We specialize in managing detailed negotiations with insurance companies, ensuring fair compensation for all our clients so that they are accommodated during their recovery period without financial strains hampering their peace of mind. Additionally, we offer unceasing legal consultation until trial completion if needed which sets us apart from others within this sector. Optimal results come from tailored strategies; therefore we cater to each case individually based on its unique requirements and intricacies following Illinois law procedures implicitly as indicated by the local jurisdiction rulings. For experienced legal advice specifically centered around Perdestrian Accidents within Harrison’s jurisdictions consider Carlson Bier – offering exceptional service wrapped in professionalism.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Harrison Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accidents can be overwhelming, particularly when you are nursing physical injuries or counselling emotional traumas. This is where our law firm, Carlson Bier, steps in to provide expert legal counsel for personal injury cases related to pedestrian accidents across Illinois. Being leaders in personal injury litigation, we pride ourselves on comprehensive legal representation that prioritizes your best interests and seeks rightful compensation.

Pedestrian accidents occur at an alarming frequency often due to negligent driving behaviours such as speeding, distracted driving, failure to yield at crosswalks, or impaired driving. According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), one pedestrian was killed every 88 minutes in traffic crashes in 2017. These statistics underscore the grave risk pedestrians face from motorized traffic on a daily basis.

• Negligence: The cornerstone of almost all personal injury lawsuits is proving negligence on the part of the other party involved.

• Duty: As individuals who share public spaces like roads and sidewalks, we owe each other a ‘duty of care’ — essentially ensuring our actions don’t harm others around us.

• Breach: If someone fails in their duty of care by acting recklessly or negligently behind the wheel claiming a life or causing harm— they’ve breached this duty.

• Causation: It stands essential aestablishing a causal relationship between the breach and your injuries .

• Damages: From medical expenses & lost income through rehab costs & non-economic damages like pain and suffering; victims have rights seeking monetary compensation.

While no settlement can undo the damage done by a devastating accident, it can relieve financial pressures piled up due to prolonged hospitalization and rehabilitation needs—with potential loss of earnings if you’re unable to work. At Carlson Bier, we leverage decades-deep-legal acumen outlining compelling arguments rooted in fact-backed-evidence championing maximum remuneration possible under Illinois state legislation.

Having accurate depiction about the accident could prove invaluable during your personal injury claim litigation. Crowded spaces, lack of witnesses, or significant damages often leave people uncertain about events transpiring leading up to the incident— making it challenging for victims establishing liability undoubtedly. We diligently work re-calibrating each minute detail from scene of accident including snap shots, video footage , eye-witnesses testimonies and medical documentation ensuring the strongest case possible.

Post-accident process commonly kick-starts with insurance adjuster reaching out aiming settlement —often regarded quick-fix to close-dossier sooner than legally required. Quite contrastingly though, this can subject you accepting much lesser than claimed leaving compromised verdict instead optimal justice deserved. Our attorneys can navigate these complex conversations on your behalf, preventing undervalued settlements while safeguarding health recovery concurrently ever-zoomed atop list-of-priorities.

At Carlson Bier we know that every pedestrian accident is unique with its own set of circumstances requiring individual legal action strategy; hence our approach always aligns tailormade solutions over one-size-fits-all routine programs typically employed by mass-practice firms charting larger levels clientele;even if this comes at expense us serving smaller but dedicated pool clients which genuinely values human aspect underlining rules-of-engagement discourse established.

Drawing curtains over a personalized session sharing deeper insights about intricacies surrounding pedestrian accidents aim ensuring that anyone who lands here leaves enriched & empowered along journey seeking what rightfully belongsto them—which unequivocally directs towards securing equitable resolution not only extending legal restitution alone but capturing broader essence self-respect , dignity one’s rightful place in society routinely marred aftermath such unfortunate incidents.This rivets vision mission as foundational bedrock driving our firm’s commitment striving erudite excellence providing top-tier legal representation.

The world might tell you your case is worth nothing; don’t let them decide its worth before consulting professionals who observe bearing unwavering uphold for justice . Know that pursuance truth demands courage; and yes,it is challenging but certainly not unattainable . Just remember you’re not in this alone ,as long Carlson Bier stands aboard. Secure your right to compensation now, click on the button below, let us evaluate your case today and embrace journey underscored by transparency fairness hopefully rekindling hope which seemed extinguished leading life marred persistent shadows of despair—towards a renewed sunshine awakening rays resilience dawned upon justice-seeking-propensity underscoring human spirit’s indomitable potential.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Harrison Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Harrison

Areas of Practice in Harrison

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering dedicated legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Tumble Injuries

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing professional legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in providing dedicated legal services for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in representing patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer