FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Personal Injury Attorney in Hinckley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with personal injury matters in Hinckley, Illinois, the legal expertise of Carlson Bier is an exceptional choice. As a firm specializing solely in personal injury law, our attorney team provides representation for clients who have had their lives disrupted due to negligence or wrongful conduct. We understand that every case possesses unique complexities; therefore, we implement a tailored strategy for each client to ensure maximum compensation. What sets Carlson Bier apart? Our commitment to justice and comprehensive understanding of Illinois’ tort laws make us stand out amidst other attorneys — especially when it pertains to multilayered issues concerning bodily harm and property damage cases. From meticulous case preparation till post-verdict follow-ups – we dedicate ourselves relentlessly towards your cause pursuing nothing but victory on your behalf while you heal from your injuries peacefully. The caliber of legal service provided by the skilled lawyers at Carlson Bier would be beneficial for anyone entrapped within hazardous circumstances leading towards substantial losses and considerable distress due to others’ indiscretions in Hinckley.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Hinckley Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a personal injury accident can be distressing and convoluted. At Carlson Bier, we understand your plight and are equipped with the expertise to guide you through every step of your case toward successful resolution. Based in Illinois, our skilled team of personal injury attorneys are committed to assuring that your rights are protected while striving diligently for due justice.

Personal injury refers broadly to an incident where an individual suffers harm as result of another person’s negligence or intentional conduct — inflictions may be physical, psychological, or both. Such incidences can occur in various contexts that routinely encompass auto accidents, fall incidents at supermarkets or on sidewalks, animal attacks like dog bites, nursing home abuse cases, medical malpractices along a list of many other situations causing accidental injuries or death.

One key tenet about personal injury law is the fundamental principle of ‘negligence,’ denoting failure by responsible parties to behave prudently resulting in harm inflicted on others. To establish negligence in a court trial necessitates proving four essential elements: Duty – indicating responsibility by defendant toward plaintiff; Breach – implying deviation from presumed duty; Causation – establishing link between claimed breach and actual damage; Damages – illustrating resultant impact tangible enough to deserve compensation.

In this arena of legal practice also comes into consideration the aspect of ‘statute of limitations’. In Illinois-specific context connected mainly with personal injuries caused by neglect rather than intentional conduct – you essentially have two years time frame beginning from date when incidence happened until filing lawsuit against defaulting party.

Moving forward with a claim requires understanding specific nuances relative to each case type involved within framework comprising general principles presented above. For instance:

– Auto Accidents: Illinois adheres strictly to ‘at-fault’ rule mandating culpable driver’s insurance coverage provide compensation.

– Slip & Fall Accidents: Here holding premises’ owner accountable depends on proving feature causing slip/fall was known by owner who did nothing to rectify it.

– Medical Malpractices: Establishing responsibility here requires expert testimony verifying default on part of medical practitioner/organization.

In concrete terms, what does all this imply for you as a victim seeking claim for personal injury? Carlson Bier law firm is designed around assuring that burdened victims don’t navigate the complex legal universe alone. Our team of skilled attorneys will help you assess credibility of your case, calculate deserved compensation value taking into account medical bills, emotional distress, lost income among others. We provide legal representation ensuring assertive negotiation or litigation if requirement presents. From filing paperwork to tackling insurance companies and other parties involved – we are committed to ensuring maximum monetary recovery for our clients while also helping them regain peace and stability in their lives.

On this page lies a free consultation button specially tailored toward assisting you get started with evaluating worthiness of your case objectively. Take advantage of this opportunity – know exactly where you stand legally concerning your unfortunate incident without owing any attorney fees unless we win your case. Navigate towards knowing how much your case could be worth by clicking the button below today. Trust us with divesting complexities tied to your situation so that you may focus better on healing from traumatic implications such situations generally deliver instead leaving legal aspects in capable hands at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hinckley Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hinckley

Areas of Practice in Hinckley

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Tumble Injuries

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents get just remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Extending experienced legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Building Crashes

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Focused on delivering compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​