Construction Site Accident Attorney in Homer Glen

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering the aftermath of a Construction Site Accident, it’s crucial to have proactive legal representation. Carlson Bier serves as an indispensable resource in these complex situations. With profound understanding and experience in managing construction accident cases specifically, our law firm suits clients seeking strong advocacy and strategic insights. We’re committed to delivering diligent support on your side from inception to resolution of your case. Our skilled professionals work tirelessly to ensure your rights are upheld after suffering workplace injuries or accidents, aiming for just compensation throughout this challenging journey. Based out of Illinois, we extend our services extensively beyond state borders with Homer Glen being one focal area where many potential clients reside who eagerly rely on us for unwavering representation under personal injury law aspects related to Construction site accidents and more areas within this broad domain intricate laws that govern workers’ safety rights nationwide prove why Carlson Bier is considered at the forefront amongst Illinois based personal injury lawyers working relentlessly towards achieving desired results for their trusted clientele base everyday.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Homer Glen Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury attorney group in Illinois. We’re committed to delivering top-notch legal representation for victims of construction site accidents. Construction sites are inherently dangerous environments with unique complexities that require expert knowledge and extensive experience to navigate. At Carlson Bier, our practice is rooted in a comprehensive understanding of these intricacies and an unwavering dedication to securing the best possible outcomes for our clients.

When it comes to construction site accidents, several critical factors come into play:

• The Scope of Involvement: Whether working on-site or just passing by, if you’ve been injured due to negligence on a construction site, you have rights that need protection.

• Identification of Responsible Parties: Various parties could be held accountable for construction accidents including architects, contractors, equipment manufacturers among others.

• Understanding Workers’ Compensation Laws: If you’re an injured employee, there’s a fine line between pursuing workers’ compensation benefits and filing a personal injury lawsuit against negligent third parties.

Our team at Carlson Bier is well-versed in all aspects concerning work injuries provided under the Illinois law – from Rights Under the Workers’ Compensation Act and Occupational Diseases Act to the No-Fault System structure among other related areas. Our goal is not only limited to helping you receive rightful compensation but also spearhead reform on safety standards and regulations in construction industry domains across Illinois.

Navigating through these laws can be overwhelming especially following a traumatic incident like an accident which is why we ensure every client receives personalized attention along with compelling representation; our mission being your complete recovery – physical, emotional and financial.

Carlson Bier’s vast experience as a dedicated advocate has made us cognizant of how daunting it can be dealing with insurance companies post such incidents. Keeping this factor into consideration:

• We meticulously investigate each case identifying key evidence supporting your claim.

• When addressing disputes involving large insurance companies – knowledge equals power! With years spent practicing personal injury law in Illinois, we communicate fluently with insurers negotiating the best possible settlements.

• Finally, armed with legal proficiency and your confidence, if the case proceeds to a trial by jury – we’re ever-ready!

At Carlson Bier, we reduce your worry and dissolve complexities. Your recovery will always remain our focus while we handle these battles for you on both – formal courtroom settings or negotiation tables.

Though each case has unique circumstances that determine its timeline towards achieving resolution, know that at Carlson Bier, commitment to impatiently pursuing justice for you is a rule written in stone. We understand the catastrophic consequences of construction accidents and are prepared to lend our expertise to restore a semblance of control back into your life.

When engaging with us at Carlson Bier, rest easy knowing that compassion is paired with powerful representation every step of the way – from free initial consultations to tailored strategies for your specific case. Furthermore, based on a contingency fee model – we don’t get paid unless you do – providing rock-solid assurance that your fight becomes ours till successful verdicts or settlements are achieved.

We welcome you to explore what Carlson Bier can extend beyond just legal representation – an ally in tough times championing robust resolutions for families across Illinois through hard work and unwavering dedication.

Unsure about how much compensation your case invites? Curiosity piqued about how Carlson Bier’s dedicated brand of service can uphold YOUR rights securing desirable outcomes? Take action today! Every inquiry is met with 100% confidentiality; no strings attached. Click below now and find out what your case could be worth! We look forward to formulating potent solutions grounded in extensive knowledge along with experience-driven strategies working hand-in-hand guiding you through this process seamlessly towards winning results!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Homer Glen Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Homer Glen

Areas of Practice in Homer Glen

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving adept legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for injuries and harm.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Incident

Ensuring professional legal advice for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in offering dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to representing victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer