FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Homer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When considering legal representation for products liability in Homer, Carlson Bier emerges as the foremost expert solution. Our practice is grounded in years of overcoming complex cases and securing client compensation for injuries due to defective goods. At Carlson Bier, we understand that products liability law is intricate with a crucial focus on details, this expertise uniquely positions us to fight relentlessly for rightful justice. Investigations are exhaustive ensuring all responsible parties are held accountable from manufacturers to retailers. We pride ourselves on our ability to distill complexities into clear strategies that cater specifically to each case’s unique needs, advocating fiercely before insurance companies and courts if necessary. This level of drive extends equitably across the state of Illinois and will be consistently delivered regardless of your geographic location within it – whether you reside in Homer or another part thereof. When weighing options concerning Products Liability lawyers’ implications far surpass mere choice; they hinge largely on individuals’ wellbeing recovering due negligence or oversight; hence choosing the competent hands at Carlson Bier becomes paramount.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Homer Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to safeguarding the rights of individuals who suffer injuries due to product failures or defects. As a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, we possess an extraordinary depth of knowledge and experience when it comes to Products Liability Law – an often complex field involving intricate laws that dictate manufacturer’s liabilities and consumer’s rights for damages from defective or hazardous products.

Products Liability is a legal doctrine that holds manufacturers, sellers, distributors and suppliers responsible for any harm their products can potentially cause. From faulty electrical appliances and contaminated food items to defectively designed automobiles and pharmaceutical negligence, products liability claims can range across industries.

Here are some key points about Products Liability:

– A strict liability principle often applies within this field; therefore, those affected do not necessarily need to prove negligence on the part of the manufacturer or distributor.

– There should be evidence of tangible physical harm or injury due to product malfunction.

– The claimant must provide proof that the product was being reasonably used as intended by the manufacturer at the time of damage.

Alongside these essential factors surrounding Products Liability cases, understanding your rights and potential compensation requires comprehension of three main types of product defects at play:

1. DESIGN DEFECTS: These occur when a design flaw makes every item coming off an assembly line inherently dangerous even if made perfectly according to plan.

2. MANUFACTURING DEFECTS: When mistakes occur during production phase resulting in only few faulty pieces instead all units.

3. MARKETING DEFECTS: Also known as failure-to-warn defects, this category includes insufficient instructions or failures to adequately warn consumers about a product’s latent dangers.

Our skilled team at Carlson Bier is adept at navigating through these complex scenarios presenting strong legal arguments combined with extensive supporting evidence which boost your chances for favorable outcomes in Products Liability compensation claims.

Of course, each client case presents its own set unique facts depending upon type and extent of injury encountered, defect prevailing in the product, and how you were using it. Therefore, erudite interpretation of complex legal elements intricately woven into Products Liability cases is essential – a service that we at Carlson Bier are keen to offer.

Accidents caused by defective products can cause incapacitating injuries such as burns, electrocution, broken bones and even death tracing back liability to multiple entities including intriguing aspects like design processes or systematic production level failures; hence an experienced personal injury lawyer’s counsel exponentially enhances chances for rightful compensation for suffered damages.

Ensuring clients’ rights over complete disclosure of safety issues related to consumer products while holding manufacturers accountable for their mistakes is our driving motive. At Carlson Bier, we pursue this field with diligence so those affected receive justice they rightly deserve.

We consistently engage with industry experts understanding intricate specifications related to varied types of consumer goods as lawsuits often involve high-stakes negotiation against business insurers and corporate attorneys – this depth strategy has earned us respectable reputation within Illinois’ personal injury law realm as relentless but reasoned advocates who remain committed every step along your seeking justice journey.

Remember, if you’ve become victim to a faulty product suffering injuries subsequently after normal use then under Illinois Product Liability laws possibility stands strong on recovering compensatory amounts covering medical expenses, lost wages due pain-inflicted lack of work ability plus non-tangible costs pertaining emotional distress or suffering endured caused by someone else’s negligence.

Pioneering Product liability litigation needs dedicated resources and extensive experience since urge becomes inevitable in drawing together teams comprising experts from assorted fields mechanical engineering to material science playing crucial roles through course claim validation process carving compelling case favoring your rightful compensation entitlement.

Understanding nuances surrounding Products Liabilities presenting individual-specific representational approaches mandates trusted personalized legal guidance aimed at ensuring you receive fair recovery for your losses.We invite you immensely benefit from our uncompromising commitment towards securing client’s fullest recovery potential coupled upholding assigned moral ethical responsibilities bestowed upon within capacity of your legal representatives.

Remember, you need not face this alone. At Carlson Bier, you have an ally ready to walk with you through every step of your lawsuits journey while shouldering the heavy lifting so you can focus on recovery. Take the first decisive step towards assertive representation today by finding out what your case could be worth—simply click on the button below for a free evaluation that could set you firmly on the path to justice and compensation.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Homer Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Homer

Areas of Practice in Homer

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing professional legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Fall Occurrences

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal support for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Mishap

Providing professional legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440