Construction Site Accident Attorney in Hoopeston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At the helm of construction site accident cases in Hoopeston, Carlson Bier shines as one of Illinois’ leading personal injury law firms. Leveraging their deep-seated understanding of complex regulations and ever-evolving construction laws, they effectively protect victims’ rights while ensuring maximum compensation. At Carlson Bier we don’t just process your claim; instead our capable attorneys strive relentlessly to present your case impeccably – meticulously prophesying the defendant’s strategy and counteracting it resourcefully. We understand that such accidents bring about not only physical distress but emotional upheaval too, hence our commitment to provide robust representation offering relief on both fronts. For us at Carlson Bier, each client is unique and so are their cases- deserving undivided attention as well as tailor-made solutions for optimal outcomes. Our expertise rooted in a rich heritage fused with cutting-edge legal strategies sets us apart from other lawyers serving Hoopeston area clients who have suffered harm through Construction Site Accidents thereby making us a preferred choice for those seeking sterling legal assistance.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Hoopeston Illinois

Carlson Bier is an esteemed legal entity well-versed in representing clients who have had the misfortune of being involved in construction site accidents across Illinois. We are a team constituted by seasoned personal injury attorneys, tenacious in our pursuit for justice and striving to ensure that negligence does not go unanswered. If you or a loved one has been a victim of a construction site accident caused by someone else’s carelessness, you can trust in the expertise of our dedicated personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier, as we assist you step-by-step on your path toward claiming your rightful compensation.

Construction sites inherently harbor high-risk environments due to the nature of work involving heavy machinery, hazardous materials, elevated heights and more. Simple human error or violation of safety protocols can lead to serious mishaps causing considerable injuries encompassing broken bones, traumatic brain injuries, various back/spinal cord injuries or even unfortunate fatalities. At times such accidents can cause catastrophic damage leading to permanent disability or loss affecting the physical and emotional wellbeing while thrusting significant financial burden upon the victims and their families.

At Carlson Bier:

• We provide diligent representation aiming for comprehensive insurance coverage for medical expenses.

• Seek lost wage reimbursement considering any loss of earning potential because of long-term incapacitation.

• Fight relentlessly for damages pertaining to psychological trauma such as pain & suffering or mental anguish.

As each case brings its unique complexities grounded upon the circumstances surrounding it:

• We conduct meticulous investigation into every aspect.

• Employ expert resources if necessary; engineers, safety inspectors, medical professionals etc.,

• Apply thorough knowledge about state-specific laws ensuring all avenue/claims are explored pursuing maximum recovery.

Extensive experience dealing with numerous construction site cases enables us to understand these instances rarely involve simple scenarios with just two parties. Sometimes there may be multiple liable parties including but not limited to employer/contractor/sub-contractors/safety equipment manufacturers et al.,

on account of which we steadfastly work toward identifying all potentially liable parties and bringing them to justice, thereby amplifying your recovery.

In Illinois it’s worth noting that the time you have for filing a personal injury lawsuit known as ‘statute of limitations’ is generally 2 years from when the incident occurred – although certain exceptions can alter this timeline in specific situations. Therefore time stands of essence and we highly recommend promptly seeking legal consultation post any such unfortunate incidents to ensure your rights are adequately safeguarded.

In line with Illinois law, Carlson Bier asserts its presence only within jurisdictions where its physical offices are located. While we serve clients statewide helping them navigate through their costly ordeal, our main office is centrally situated providing ready accessibility to our expert resources ensuring comprehensive support throughout your case. Regardless of where you reside in Illinois, seeking our assistance will save you from having to traverse this complicated process alone

At Carlson Bier, rest assured each case matters not just on professional grounds but also personally. We aspire not merely being lawyers assisting during times of crisis; rather striving towards establishing long-lasting relationships based out empathy and trust beyond courtrooms or legal settings.

We understand recovering from any construction site accident is a difficult path involving not just physical healing but equally demanding emotional recuperation catering to which we firmly advocate our client’s rights relieving them off complex legal navigations allowing focus on their wellbeing & recovery while we combat their battles steadily marching towards appropriate compensation.

Now would be an excellent opportunity for gaining insightful inputs about what your case might be worth directly from our experienced team at Carlson Bier by simply clicking on the button provided below.

Remember one size doesn’t fit all; each unique situation comes enclosed with different factors contributing towards determination of potential settlement sums hence speak up now! Don’t let uncertainties befog your journey, instead allow us an opportunity to assist you while leaving no stone unturned securing greatest possible outcome in coherence with justice and fairness legitimizing your claim.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hoopeston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hoopeston

Areas of Practice in Hoopeston

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying specialist legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing expert legal representation for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Building Incidents

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on offering expert legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Specializing in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer