Construction Site Accident Attorney in La Grange

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a construction site accident in La Grange, selecting an adept legal team can make a significant difference to your case. With Carlson Bier at your side, rest assured, you are entrusting critical legal decisions to seasoned professionals who excel in representing personal injury victims. Our forte lies in unraveling complex construction accident incidents; our skilled attorneys work diligently to expose liable parties and pursue maximum compensation for your pain and suffering. Over the years, Carlson Bier has built a stellar reputation based on our tangible results and strong commitment towards ensuring justice for the injured individuals of Illinois. We understand how daunting it can be dealing with medical bills or loss of income during such strenuous times which is why we push beyond conventional boundaries to address all aspects affecting your recovery after tragedy strikes on the job-site. Choose us as lawyers experienced in handling construction site accidents; together let’s strive for rightful recompense guaranteed under Illinois law.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in La Grange Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we know that construction site accidents can drastically alter lives. In an instant, you or a loved one might be dealing with severe injuries and complex legal hurdles, testing the strength of family ties and redefining personal resilience. Our mission as Illinois-based personal injury lawyers is to guide victims of these unfortunate mishaps through this challenging period seamlessly and effectively fighting for your rightful compensation.

In a bustling state like Illinois where construction projects abound, the risk of construction site accidents cannot be overstated—falls from heights, struck by objects, electrocutions, collapsed trenches, and scaffolding incidents are just some examples of potential hazards. The victims often bear physical injuries encompassing fractures to spinal cord damage or traumatic brain injuries. Additionally, psychological trauma due to such life-altering experiences should not be discounted either.

• Accidents on construction sites illustrate a myriad complexity owing to the multiple entities involved – equipment manufacturers, owners of the property, architects or engineers may each have roles in ensuring safety which, when neglected could lead to devastating results.

• Claims related to construction site accidents require an adept application of both workers’ compensation law as well as personal injury law – precisely where our expert attorneys come into play.

• State regulations necessitate every employer’s compliance with specific workplace safety standards under OSHA guidelines– Breach these rules provide leverage easing claims pertinent to negligence further contributing towards workers’ compensation benefits.

Understanding these complexities is paramount in establishing strategy while initiating any claim arising from construction accidents; without it lies possibilities riddled with missing out on comprehensive benefits you rightfully deserve.

The realm of personal injury law in Illinois is no easy labyrinth. Through numerous cases spanning years’ worth professionals at Carlson Bier encapsulate formidable experience now packaged into empathetic representation ready for deploying at your service. We pride ourselves in meticulously investigating your case’s unique circumstances before devising personalized strategies thereby maximizing recovery potential inherent within your claim.

Our services extend beyond mere legal representation. The daunting phase following any construction site injury is often also synonymous with mounting medical bills, long absences from work and resultant loss of income besides plaguing doubts about the future. To alleviate these accompanying anxieties, our dedicated team relentlessly works to buffer this stress helping you deal with insurance companies or even propound possible solutions towards effective life-care planning.

Why choose us? Our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier take pride in superior client service extending personalized attention at every stage of your claim’s journey. Not only do we uphold a reputation built over years of commitment capturing best outcomes for clients but complement this trust by adopting a contingency fee model – we get paid only when you do. Also noteworthy is our firm’s adherence to rigorous ethical standards candidly conveying case strengths or weaknesses alike steering clear from offering unreal assurances merely to entice clientele.

Navigating through personal injury claims post-construction accidents can pose as a formidable challenge without reliable guidance backing you during such tumultuous times. However, reaching out to us heralds ushering that proficient support into your life treading beyond token legal realizations towards holistic aid intertwining empathy with expertise.

Remember; it is not enough simply knowing rights exist – what essentially transforms lives is efficacious enforcement evoking justice and recompense concurrently. Therefore, take that first step guaranteeing comprehensive coverage for any losses suffered – Click on the button below now and find out how much your case could be worth today! Functioning within Illinois law stipulations remember; We’re not just a law firm somewhere in Illinois – we are YOUR champions right here!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For La Grange Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in La Grange

Areas of Practice in La Grange

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending skilled legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Delivering professional legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Incidents

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain fair compensation for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on providing professional legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Specializing in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer