Construction Site Accident Attorney in La Salle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a construction site accident within the precincts of La Salle, reaching out to Carlson Bier can be your best consideration. Specialized in construction site accidents law, we work relentlessly towards navigating complex legalities and fighting for your rights. Crafted through years of experience and unwavering dedication to client service, our expertise has garnered us recognition among leading personal injury lawyers across Illinois State. Our profound sensitivity towards victims allows us to effectively comprehend the traumatic impact of an accident while demonstrating unmatched dedication towards achieving optimal outcomes for clients. We not only do everything ethically possible to ensure that fault is accurately established but are also committed to securing rightful compensation proportionate with incurred damages – both physical & emotional trauma or material losses attributed by the mishap. Grant yourself peace of mind amidst distressing times; trust the credibility and reliability afforded by Carlson Bier – champions at tackling complex Construction Site Accident cases diligently serving residents across La Salle tirelessly irrespective of their location requirements.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in La Salle Illinois

The law firm, Carlson Bier, expertly specializes in achieving justice for victims involved in construction site accidents. As a professional personal injury attorney group located in Illinois, we understand the intricacies and complexities that surround such cases. Construction sites naturally harbor dangerous and unpredictable situations that can leave workers susceptible to an array of injuries or even fatalities.

Our proficient team here at Carlson Bier is dedicated to protecting the rights and welfare of those injured on construction sites. We have significant understanding of safety regulations and industry standards upheld by organizations such as Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) – an integral knowledge base when formulating a strong case for our clients. We are adept at identifying negligence from parties such as contractors, sub-contractors, equipment manufacturers and property owners.

There are numerous types of construction site accidents that may have severe consequences:

• Falls from heights; risking catastrophic injuries like broken bones or spinal damage,

• Equipment-related incidents; often caused due to faulty machinery or improper training,

• Electrocution hazards; due to exposed wires or improper grounding,

• Construction site debris; often leading to slip-and-fall incidents.

In responding promptly to these unfortunate occurrences, collecting evidence is vital. Our diligent team ensures a thorough investigation involving consultation with medical professionals, witness interviews, securing accident scene photos and more – all pivotal steps towards establishing liability.

Acquiring compensation for your consequential damages is our top priority – as you grapple with physical pain, loss of ability in performing essential tasks, monetary strain caused by medical bills and lost wages: our team vigorously fights for you.

Navigating legal recourses after sustaining an injury can be overwhelming—especially while also dealing with trauma post-incident. Therefore hiring experienced attorneys like Carlson Bier plays a crucial role. By representing you both inside and outside the courtrooms if required—we ease this challenging pursuit making every step manageable for you.

Equipped with extensive experience in handling litigation related to construction site accidents, our lawyers strategically guide you through the complex web of legal proceedings. We strive for valuable settlements and winning verdicts on your behalf. Additionally, we ensure adherence to time-sensitive deadlines in filing lawsuits to maximize your recoverable damages.

Importantly, it is not uncommon for injuries to manifest after the incident—compounding medical complications over time which induce further financial distress. Therefore, timely consultation with us allows accurate representation of your case ensuring full compensation captures both immediate and future impact.

At Carlson Bier, know that here you are more than just a client: you’re family. Let us take charge while you focus solely on your recovery—we work relentlessly from claim inception to settlement finalizing or trial conclusion.

By clicking on the button below, our attorneys provide an initial free consultation outlining a possible trajectory for your case. Details such as merits of launching legal action against responsible parties and estimating potential compensation would be discussed. Given every case is unique in terms of circumstances surrounding incidents, nature of injuries and resulting implications; no predetermined amounts can be assured without specific evaluation.

Thus at Carlson Bier, we invite you—an aggrieved party seeking reparation—to ascertain what your case could potentially be worth financially in real-time by pressing the button below today! So stand up for justice while roping in relentless advocates because where there’s injury – there must always be accountability!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For La Salle Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in La Salle

Areas of Practice in La Salle

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying expert legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Mishaps

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive just settlement for hurts and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending specialist legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Injuries

Expert in delivering specialized legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in advocating for patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer