...

Personal Injury Attorney in Lake Catherine

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to personal injury cases, residents of Lake Catherine need a dedicated and accomplished attorney in their corner. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into the picture. Our law firm specializes exclusively in personal injury law, providing our clients with knowledgeable and aggressive representation they can count on. We bring decades of experience to the table, fighting relentlessly for those injured due to another’s negligence. Whether your case involves an auto accident, medical malpractice or workplace mishap – rest assured that we will stake everything on ensuring your rights are upheld. At Carlson Bier, you won’t just find a lawyer; instead you’ll be partnered up with advocates who treat your cause as their own, fully committed towards achieving justice for you one step at a time! Let our esteemed group of attorneys navigate the complexities of Illinois’ Personal Injury laws on your behalf while working towards securing maximum compensation owed to you under those laws.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Lake Catherine Illinois

Carlson Bier is a renowned personal injury law firm devoted to serving the residents of Illinois with persistent dedication and unrivaled legal expertise. As experienced and skillful legal practitioners, we command in-depth understanding in handling diverse cases tied primarily to personal injuries. Our esteemed clientele confides in us due to our exceptional records that are punctuated by consistency, meticulousness, and success.

Personal injuries can arise from numerous scenarios ranging from mishaps at your workplace, traffic collisions, medical negligence among other unfortunate accidents. When confronted with such situations that might lead to either physical or psychological distress, it’s crucial not only grasp your rights comprehensively but also establish if you qualify for compensation. At Carlson Bier, we strive to enlighten you on these critical aspects bearing in mind the following:

• Every Personal Injury Case Is Unique: No two incidents will result in similar injuries nor have identical circumstances surrounding them. Therefore every case needs a tailored approach when seeking justice or compensation.

• The Necessity for Prompt Action: Certain statutes may limit the timeframe within which you’re allowed to press charges or make a claim after an incident has occurred.

• The Vital Role of Evidence: Document anything and everything that could potentially support your case – this includes photographs of the scene/injury, witness testimonies and professional medical evaluations.

Our committed attorneys work unremittingly beyond just court representation; they take time delve into accruing comprehensive details about applicable laws relating specifically to your predicament. Such unwavering diligence guarantees precise advice that steers you through making well-informed decisions regarding potential compensations suitable for lost wages or incurred medical expenses.

Navigating the ins-outs associated with lawsuits tied to personal injuries without proficient legal aid practically equates to planning for defeat rather than victory. At Carlson Bier, besides offering outstanding legal counsel expressly intended safeguarding your best interests throughout any hearings, negotiations or settlements processes involved; our team further ensures by undertaking most heavy-lifting you avoid unnecessary burdens associated lawsuits.

Accomplishing justice shouldn’t beget devastating your finances. Therefore, our pricing model puts into consideration such factors by implementation of contingency basis payment pattern. Meaning, at Carlson Bier we charge no fees until after case’s favourable resolution, then we only claim a previously agreed upon percentage from compensation amount awarded.

Victims aren’t just numbers or cases to us – they’re individuals with families and dependents who might also suffer immensely whenever their loved ones experience personal injury related anguish. With this in mind, our team exudes empathy ensuring you and those close to you acquire not only sound advice but all necessary emotional support required during such trying moments.

At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about winning – it’s also about setting fresh standards whenever defending rights of injured parties involved becomes necessity. Our resolute dedication into guaranteeing every client garners justified contentment forms an indelible cornerstone anchoring us as Illinois’ reputable personal injury law firm.

Shouldering the pain and costs engendered by someone else’s reckless actions is injurious enough already – Don’t let confusion surrounding unresolved legal questions aggravate situation even more so! To find out what your case may be worth under Carlson Bier’s capable guidance; click on the button below right away. Launch onto journey characterized by reassurance – confident that your well-being and interests remain prioritized above everything else because here at Carlson Bier – Your Justice Is Not Just The Goal It’s An Assurance!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Catherine Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Lake Catherine

Areas of Practice in Lake Catherine

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying adept legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing expert legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Incidents

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking recovery for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for hurts and losses.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Specializing in representing clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer