Construction Site Accident Attorney in Lemont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a construction site accident can be an overwhelming ordeal, and securing the right legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier Associates stands out as the premier go-to for impeccable accident attorney services in such complex matters. Our group of attorneys specializes in handling construction site injury claims, committed to help our clients pursue maximum compensation for their losses. Distinctly experienced with Illinois’ intricate laws concerning these accidents, including workers’ compensation statutes, our firm aims to simplify this daunting process for you. We ensure every client’s claim is meticulously handled from start to finish—proving negligence or liability while advocating fiercely for your rights during negotiations or litigation trials. Partnering with us guarantees that your case will receive relentless pursuit matched up with skilled legal assistance throughout every step towards recovery and justice realization. Ultimately, it isn’t just about being lawyers; at Carlson Bier we pride ourselves on standing by victims of construction injuries when they need support most – working relentlessly so you don’t have to face alone after such traumatizing incidences.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Lemont Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to the protection and advocacy of individuals who have been subjected to unfortunate circumstances at construction sites. Our specialty lies in personal injury law with a distinct concentration on construction accidents. Over the years, our competent team has served victims across Illinois, utilizing an extensive understanding of state laws and regulations.

Construction sites are inherently hazardous environments laden with potential risks of bodily harm due to their dynamic character involving continuously changing landscapes. Construction companies bear a certain degree of responsibility for ensuring safety protocols are strictly adhered to mitigate these inherent risks. When they fail in this duty, it often results in severe injuries or potential loss of life.

Unfortunately, many construction workers or passersby fall victim to negligence or sheer disregard for safety rules by some entities involved in the construction process. This neglect can manifest as slip and fall accidents due to inadequate cleanup procedures or poorly placed equipment; falling debris from mismanaged load lifts causing blunt force trauma; scaffold collapsing from improper setup leading to debilitating injuries like broken bones, spinal injury or even brain damage.

Dealing with such incidents extends beyond physical healing where survivors grapple with significant emotional turmoil accompanied by mounting medical bills and lost work wages making recovery much more challenging than it should be.We here at Carlson Bier understand that pain and we offer our expertise in personal injury law so you don’t have to handle this journey alone.

We consider several factors while evaluating each case:

-Ensure necessary documentation is collected right from medical reports providing details about your injury to incident reports filed at the site.

-Identify all parties responsible which could range from construction company itself if it failed on maintaining safe condition onsite to manufacturer if faulty machinery were a causative factor.

-Pursue necessary investigations stepping beyond preliminary police report via private investigators contributing further data supporting your claim.

-Evaluate financial compensations considering current psychological distresses & medical expenses but also future needs like rehabilitation costs or continued treatments ensuring all aspects covered effectively emphasizing a comprehensive settlement.

Our commitment to our clients is evidenced by the exhaustive measures we take in the pursuit of justice on their behalf, and Carlson Bier lends its voice towards advocacy for every victim’s rights. We acknowledge that each case presents a unique set of circumstances and requires an equally unique strategy tailored specifically to optimally serve victims’ interests.

Victims often endure immense strain attempting to navigate intricate legal corridors while also focusing on recovery from their injuries. Our team effectively shoulders that burden leaving victims free to focus solely on healing while remaining assured they are represented by a seasoned, knowledgeable advocate acutely aware of Illinois state laws pertaining to personal injury litigation in construction accidents.

Here at Carlson Bier, we strive to ensure that our valued clientele have access not just to justice but also effective compensation thus aiding in speeding up their road to recovery. You deserve complete restitution for having endured harrowing experiences which were not your fault, providing you peace of mind while pursuing your justified claim becomes our responsibility once chosen as your defenders.In essence, Carlson Bier represents hope during distressing times and strives for delivering justice one case at a time.

Whether it be navigating complex construction accident laws or helping secure financial compensation during challenging times like these, our personalized approach ensures no stone remains unturned when it comes to representing your right as an injury victim. Everyone deserves quality representation following traumatic events, which is exactly what we can guarantee here at Carlson Bier.

If you’ve suffered from a construction site accident and are unsure how much your case is worth or simply need guidance understanding next steps, reach out to us today for insightful assistance tailored especially for you. Click the button below now to find out how much strength lies behind your case – let us help you retrieve all due compensations ensuring deserved peace & relief after trying times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lemont Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lemont

Areas of Practice in Lemont

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Offering skilled legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on providing dedicated legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on representing victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer