...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Personal Injury Attorney in Long Creek

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When personal injury strikes, it’s crucial to align yourself with a trustworthy and experienced team. Look no further than Carlson Bier, an established Illinois-based law firm specializing exclusively in personal injury cases. Our top priority is advocating for your rights and providing legal advice that will ultimately lead you down the path of recovery. Through meticulous attention to detail coupled with strategic approach, our aim is always to secure the maximum compensation you deserve after experiencing harm due to others’ negligence or wanton conduct. As a premiere law firm in Illinois serving clients across communities such as Long Creek without direct representation implications; we believe in not just gaining justice but restoring dignity back into lives disrupted by loss or impairment. Carlson Bier’s winning track record underscores our commitment to victims of diverse personal injuries: workplace accident,s slip-and-falls,negligence,motor vehicle accidents among others.Carlson Bier – Your beacon during challenging times; representing resilience,recovery,and restitution for all afflicted parties.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Long Creek Illinois

Carlson Bier is an esteemed law firm specializing in personal injury cases, located in the heart of Illinois. With a wealth of experience and profound knowledge of personal injury law, we at Carlson Bier are deeply committed to protecting your rights and ensuring you receive due compensation for any suffering caused by negligent or wrongful acts.

Personal injury law encompasses many realms, including but not limited to traffic accidents, workplace injuries, medical malpractice, product liability, and slip-and-fall incidents. If you’ve been harmed due to someone else’s mistake or negligence — whether it’s from a doctor’s misdiagnosis or a household product that malfunctioned — there might be legal recourse available for you. This possibility greatly escalates under circumstances where your economic stability has been directly affected through loss of income or debilitating healthcare bills related to the incident. It’s essential to know what constitutes as personal injury under the purview of the law:

• If physical pain and suffering have been inflicted on you as a result of another party’s actions.

• If mental anguish or psychological disorders lead back to intentional infliction by another person / entity.

• If you’re unable to perform regular work duties because of an accident caused by another party.

At Carlson Bier, we leave no stone unturned when defending our clients’ rights. Our goal extends beyond mere representation; we aim at empowering our clients with understanding their rights under Illinois personal injury laws whilst providing guidance every step along the process – beginning from initial consultation till conclusion.

Navigating through complicated legal procedures can indeed be challenging; moreover so when dealing with consequences left behind by harmful accidents. Recognizing this reality critically reinstates why professional guidance becomes indispensable during such difficult times.

• A proficient lawyer will identify if your case falls within realm of personal injury lawsuits.

• They will inform you about potential monetary compensations that might be available for both economic & non-economic damages.

• Yielding years of experience in managing personal injury claims, they can evaluate and help prepare a formidable legal strategy for your case.

• Professional lawyers can manage legal deadlines & multifaceted paperwork involved in injury cases for you.

At Carlson Bier, we go that extra mile to ensure our clients understand these complexities; with us by their side, they are never alone during this critical stage of life. Our team is driven by compassion and duty to simplicity – explaining complex legal terminologies while ensuring clients feel comfortable and secure throughout the process.

As personal injury attorneys, we work on a contingency fee basis – meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case! We believe that the ability to seek justice should not be restricted due to financial constraints, hence such a model truly resonates with the spirit behind our services. Consulting Carlson Bier will not cost you anything upfront; it only stands as an opportunity for you to better understand your current situation relative potential resolve paths under Illinois law.

Though based in Illinois, one must note that every region has its unique laws pertaining to personal injuries. As such, geography becomes a determining factor when dealing with court proceedings or settling out of court. At Carlson Bier though we limit our physical presence within operation regions compliant with state laws of Illinois; however, our collective expertise incorporates efficacious handling of diverse case types evolving from jurisdictions spanning across different locations within the state boundaries.

In short – If Personal Injury has casted shadows over your near future – It’s time for you take that first step towards light at end of tunnel. No matter how daunting or complicated your situation might seem right now – Remember there is always hope if right action is taken timely.

Potential monetary compensation may not erase distressing emotions tied with such incidents but indeed helps create room for healing and revival. That said: Discover what lies ahead without any obligations by merely clicking on button below! Find out how much compensation might be available in context with given specifics around YOUR individual situation. Welcome to Carlson Bier – Where We Turn SETBACKS into COMEBACKS!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Long Creek Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Long Creek

Areas of Practice in Long Creek

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing expert legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Offering dedicated legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending skilled legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Slip Injuries

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Focused on helping victims of car accidents obtain fair settlement for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Mishap

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Expert in extending compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Focused on supporting patients with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​