FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Manhattan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we believe in fighting tirelessly for the rights of workers who have suffered injury due to construction site accidents. With years of advocacy under our belts, we’re adept at navigating complex legal scenarios and advocating for the full compensation you rightfully deserve. Based out of Illinois, our dedicated team has an unwavering commitment to reach beyond borders – where your need exists is where our services extend. Our understanding extends to Manhattan’s vibrant construction industry; thus being well-versed with its unique challenges is non-negotiable while handling cases based there. We leverage this localized knowledge together with a laser-focused approach on personal injury law which enhances the quality of representation that Carlson Bier offers for all clients involved in Construction Site Accidents. As specialists rooted firmly in rigorous ethical standards, we ensure your claim will be handled professionally and confidentially as we fight strenuously on your behalf without ever settling for less than what you are entitled to recover. Trust respect-driven results when choosing Carlson Bier as your specialist partner in personal injury law amidst complicated times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Manhattan Illinois

At the reputable law firm of Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating consequences that can result from construction site accidents and are dedicated to helping victims navigate through their legal concerns. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois specializing in handling these complex cases, our team offers unmatched expertise and an unwavering commitment to securing justice for our clients.

When you think about a construction site, what usually comes to mind is a hazardous environment with potential dangers at every turn. Mobile machinery or equipment that could malfunction, building materials scattered all over the place, workers conducting tasks high above ground – these scenarios depict just a fraction of scenarios that could lead to significant injuries on a construction site.

In fact:

• Construction workers have six times higher chances than other industries’ workers to suffer injuries requiring extended absence from work.

• One in five worker deaths annually happens in construction.

• Falls are among leading causes of fatal injuries at construction sites

• Being struck by objects or getting caught between them ranks second among such causes.

If you’ve sustained any kind of injury due to negligence, malfunctioning equipment, faulty safety measures or similar events at your workplace within a construction setup — don’t hesitate: Knowing your rights and possible compensatory claims is crucial. It’s not always easy understanding legal jargon or knowing how laws favor victims’ rights in accidents occurring on constructions sites but rest assured – experienced professionals like us will work tirelessly for you.

The severity and consequence of injuries emanating from construction sites can be wide-ranging; extending from minor fractures that heal without complications to catastrophic incidents resulting in permanent disability or worse still – loss of life. Whatever the nature of your accident may be – whether obvious (like bone breaks) or less tangible (examples being emotional trauma), there’s always profound impact physically as well emotionally upon affected individuals plus their families.

Building up your case is more attainable when equipped with proper documentation relating directly towards accident occurrence which would prove invaluable during legal proceedings:

• Relevant medical records that clearly outline the degree of physical harm encountered

• Photographic evidence securely showcasing accident site context

• Witness testimonies detailing precise event chains as they unfolded

Working collaboratively with us will ensure optimal strategies for your case, crucial in proving fault and helping you recover the maximum compensation available under Illinois law. Our commitment is not just towards winning cases but, more importantly, to restore life’s normalcy while you recover from traumas adverse experiences cause.

Remember, time is critical when it comes to filing personal injury lawsuits in Illinois. The statute of limitations governing personal injury claims stipulates two years – from the date of incidence – as allotted window within which victims could file suits against wrongdoers in pursuit for fair compensations.

Clearly then, reaching out promptly to experts conversant with intricacies surrounding construction-site related injuries is cardinal. It helps significantly aligning all nuances properly upon advice we offer to our clients – aimed squarely at ensuring rights are adequately protected whilst setting up success likelihoods accordingly.

Let Carlson Bier be instrumental in delivering justice whether through skilled negotiation settlements or prepared litigation approaches if at all necessary. We stay abridged with evolving legislative statutes so essential towards winning your valid compensation case favorably; our primary obligation being alleviating pressures otherwise imposed upon affected parties during periods of recovery.

Wrapping things up: Being involved within a construction site accident can understandably seem overwhelming and couched with uncertainty. However, let’s assure you: You’re not alone! Presented below is an opportunity specifically designed for those who have experienced similar predicaments — specially crafted around unveiling potential compensations due worthily towards impacted individuals post accidents occurring on constructions sites.

Through navigating this daunting path together while engaging compassionate professionals vested fully in lending requisite support plus unyielding advocacy throughout claim procedures becomes our singular goal. Click on the button below now and find out how much your case could be worth!

Note- This writing represents an attorney advertisement. If you have questions directly related towards claims discussed, please contact us via explicit methods indicated for comprehensive consultations. Always remember that this information should not be used as legal advice over individual situations but merely to provide general knowledge within browsing contexts only.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Manhattan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Manhattan

Areas of Practice in Manhattan

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Providing specialist legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing specialist legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Occurrences

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable remuneration for harms and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Accident

Delivering professional legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Incidents

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440