...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in McKinley Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the life-altering impact of a spinal cord injury, it’s pivotal to have an ally who can navigate the legal landscape effectively. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in – a powerhouse law firm noted for exceptional prowess in handling personal injury cases, specifically those involving spinal cord injuries. With substantial expertise and deep-rooted understanding of Illinois law, we’re prepared to tirelessly defend your rights and seek appropriate compensation. Our approach is tailored; every case is unique as each client comes with individual needs, circumstances and expectations. We meticulously analyze each aspect of your claim while working directly with medical professionals to clearly understand all facets related to ongoing treatment costs or future care needs resulting from such serious injuries. At Carlson Bier decisions are intentional while strategies are carefully designed offering you valuable peace-of-mind during this strenuous journey towards justice. For comprehensive representation conditioned by compassion and competence in matters pertaining Spinal Cord Injuries look no further than Carlson Bier – steadfast allies committedly standing by your side.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in McKinley Park Illinois

When it comes to spinal cord injuries, the law firm of Carlson Bier stands as an beacon in the legal landscape of Illinois. With exhaustive knowledge and years of experience navigating such cases, we remain committed to delivering justice for victims who’ve suffered these catastrophic injuries. A spinal injury can be life-altering, often leading to severe pain, loss of bodily functions or even paralysis. The aftermath not only burdens you physically but also emotionally and financially; a burden certainly unfair if your injury is a result of someone else’s negligence.

Understanding the magnitude and implications of a spinal cord injury is quintessential in bringing out its severity. To put things into context:

– The spinal cord is instrumental in sending signals from your brain throughout your body.

– Any damage there can impede this communication, potentially causing loss of sensation and mobility.

– Injuries are broadly classified under two categories: complete (resulting in total loss of sensory function) or incomplete (some sensory function remains).

– Consequences typically include partial or full paralysis which may either be paraplegia (affects legs and lower body) or quadriplegia (affect all four limbs).

Illiinois laws reflect our shared empathy towards those affected by extending legal recourse for compensation on the grounds that another party’s negligence directly led to the injury. However, pursuing recompense requires compelling evidence demonstrating the other party’s liability, causation linking their actions directly to the inflicted injuries followed by establishing damages quantifying its financial impact.

The battleground where this “proof” clashes with counterarguments is complex territory often requiring expert navigation – exactly why you need comprehensive representation offering more than just legal acumen – attorneys empathetic towards your plight working relentlessly to ensure fair resolution.

At Carlson Bier, we carry forward our vast experience dealing with such cases into every new challenge thrown our way – combining insightful strategies with relentless persistence. We work closely together with medical professionals ensuring meticulous detail outlining proofs of negligence, all while maintaining complete transparency with our clients. Our expertise is aimed towards ensuring proper compensation covering various aspects such as:

– Medical expenses (including future medical bills and rehabilitation expenses)

– Loss of wages and earning capacity

– Pain and suffering

– Life care costs (wheelchairs, home modifications etc.)

– Emotional distress

Additionally, in certain cases punitive damage claims are considered which aim to punish the negligent party for their recklessness.

To be clear – we battle enormous odds to deliver justice through these legally complex scenarios. However, that doesn’t imply legalese-riddled conversations where you strain to understand what’s happening with your case. Law can be complicated but we make it a point to keep communications simple and straightforward insulating you from legal jargon as much possible.

The road post spinal cord injury might seem daunting but remember – you’re not alone on this journey. Carlson Bier serves as experienced guides committed helping navigate this unnerving ordeal legally while offering emotional support throughout the process

A successful litigation experience involves more than just winning your case; it includes feeling understood, cared for and listened to every step of the way. We make sure your voice isn’t lost amidst the bustle and work tirelessly creating an environment fueled by empathy transforming your tense situation into a journey increasingly conducive towards healing.

Countless stories resonate how our efforts bore fruit reclaiming normalcy minimizing the life-altering impact suffered due to negligent parties’ actions singlehandedly escorting victims out of hopelessness into light at tunnel’s end.

In conclusion; timing is paramount when investigating spinal injuries so if you or your loved one is suffering from a similar plight waiting will only dissipate chances of claiming rightful compensation Go ahead click below find out what your case worth Let’s together unwrap silence shrouding injustice propelling towards closure – one step at time!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For McKinley Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in McKinley Park

Areas of Practice in McKinley Park

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending specialist legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Extending expert legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Fall Accidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents secure equitable payout for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Incident

Providing specialist legal advice for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Committed to offering specialized legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending clients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer