FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Mendon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking a premier Products Liability attorney, look no further than Carlson Bier. A revered name across Illinois and respected in Mendon, this legal titan adds immense value through their knowledge of tort law specialities including product liability cases. Their team comprises qualified attorneys dedicated to safeguarding consumer rights by holding manufacturers accountable for negligence or misconduct that leads to harmful situations. With years of significant victories in both settlement negotiations and courtroom trials, it is clear that they possess exceptional skills when challenging large corporations or insurance entities who attempt unjustly denying rightful claims.

Their commitment extends beyond mere representation; they delve deep into each case with the highest level of attention while carefully determining factors surrounding accidents grapple litigation complexities head-on. Furthermore, with an unwavering dedication towards client service and successful completion coupled with rich resources within employ allows them to build compelling evidence-backed narratives – making Carlson Bier your best consideration when it comes to Products Liability claims across Illinois. Trust our expertise – we’re here for you every step of the way.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Mendon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our esteemed personal injury lawyers understand the full breadth of Products Liability law and its foremost importance within Illinois. With an extensive track record of success and dedicated service to countless clients, we tenaciously work towards delivering exceptional results in this complex legal field.

Primarily centered on holding manufacturers or sellers accountable for placing defective products into consumers’ hands, Products Liability law remains a crucial component of consumer rights. Factors determining the manufacturer or seller’s liability include circumstances under which the product was sold, expected performance standards of the product, consequential obligation arising out of the product’s failure, amongst various others.

Our unmatched dedication to maintaining transparency often leads us to elaborate specifically on our practices. Firstly, products can be defective commonly in three ways: design defects occur when all instances of a certain product are inherently unsafe; manufacturing defects happen during production alone; while warning defects involve insufficient instructions or warnings regarding usage – thus leading to preventable accidents.

At Carlson Bier, our team ensures thorough investigation relying not only upon available physical evidence but also unraveling potential design faults or inadequate user-guidance that could have been responsible for causing harm. Countless precedents speak volumes about our commitment towards securing justice and appropriate compensation for victims subjected to such unfortunate incidents due to faulty products.

It is noteworthy that Illinois adopts a ‘Modified Comparative Fault’ rule when pursuing these types of cases. Essentially if you’re more than 50% at fault for your own injury due to carelessness while using said faulty product – you may not receive damages at all! Hence craftsmanship matters as we tailor-fit winning strategies anchored around unique permutations resident in every case.

Possessing rich expertise in interpreting nuanced regulations unique to Illinois state law makes us proficient navigators steering through varying complexities surrounding Products Liability claims here. We pursue understanding over misplaced preconceptions – doing everything needed from reconstructing accident scenes to cross-referencing past litigations – tirelessly working towards establishing irrefutable proof of product-defects and subsequent liability.

Prominently, there is no precise “one size fits all” claim value when contemplating Products Liability cases in Illinois. Several dynamic variables are considered towards calculating settlement values such as medical treatment costs, lost wages due to inability to work, impairment suffered in terms of quality of life post-incident etc. At Carlson Bier, we thoroughly consider these varied elements and diligently build our case strategies factoring broad financial impacts afflicted upon our clients.

Product Law Liability demands a thorough understanding not only about the injury caused but also an insightful comprehension regarding manufacturing processes, product-regulations approved per se amongst numerous other technical practicalities. Often proving effective – this rigorous approach through dedicated fact-finding accentuates key strengths within every case leading directly to credible results.

From representing victims of defective industrial equipment at workplaces to those hurt by unsafe toys, auto-parts or even prescription drugs; our remarkable diversity enables us rounding up decades-worth accumulated knowledge across varied sectors thus becoming known authorities within Products Liability law throughout Illinois.

Certainly, instances where products cause harm due to inherent defects are outright unjust – every consumer deserves a fair shake! As your trusted legal proponents within Illinois – we take pride in securing justice for victims subject to negligence by manufacturers or sellers falling short on their fundamental duty towards safe product delivery.

To discover more about your unique circumstance and understand the depth of recourse available under Illinois Laws pertaining Products Liability – We invite you to find out what your case might be worth. Click on the button below and begin your journey towards justice with Carlson Bier associates now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mendon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Mendon

Areas of Practice in Mendon

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying adept legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Extending expert legal support for victims affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents gain fair recompense for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Accident

Ensuring experienced legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for damages.

Construction Incidents

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Focused on defending persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440