Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Mokena

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When slip and fall accidents occur, the legal expertise of Carlson Bier can make a significant difference in your recovery. As personal injury attorneys specializing in such cases in Mokena, we are well-versed with the complexities surrounding these incidents. Our meticulous approach involves gathering evidence, consulting relevant experts and presenting compelling arguments before insurance companies or courts to maximize client compensation. Slip and fall injuries can quite often be severe – fractures or even traumatic brain injuries – that leave victims with substantial medical bills, lost wages and pain. At Carlson Bier, we deeply understand this reality. Focused on protecting our clients’ rights against big insurance companies who may dismiss their sufferings as insignificant; We are relentless advocates for those injured due to negligence on properties resulting in slips & falls.Accident victimes should remember that it is not about blaming anyone but ensuring you have means to heal physically & financially.That’s why partnering with Carlson Bier ensures strategic representation when you need it most.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Mokena Illinois

When it comes to an unfortunate event like a slip and fall accident, Carlson Bier, a seasoned personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, stands staunchly by your side. We understand the complexities that these unnerving incidents involve and how catastrophic they can be for individuals and their families alike. As experienced legal professionals, we commit ourselves to provide sound legal advice to maximize compensation in light of these accidents.

Slip and fall cases generally hinge on premises liability law — an area where our expertise is unparalleled. Essentially, premises liability is the concept that property owners bear the responsibility of maintaining safety measures within their purview area. If you’ve suffered due to negligence in this aspect, do remember not all injuries will qualify for compensation under this guideline primarily because:

• The existence of dangerous conditions must have been known or ought reasonably to have been known by the property owner.

• Injuries must link directly with the unsafe environment or hazard.

• It needs evidence proving that no reasonable attempt was made towards mitigating such risks by said owner.

In case busily maintained sidewalks are at question covered by snow or ice, there’s a ‘reasonableness standard,’ which determines if caretakers responded timely and effectively once they were aware of how perilous conditions had become.

The severity of injuries stemming from slips and falls varies greatly; minor cuts or bruises often transform into long-term chronic ailments necessitating surgeries/ rehabilitations. Costs also fluctuate depending upon specific circumstances surrounding each situation— medical bills obviously being significant but loss of earnings during recovery along with lifelong impacts on lifestyle need equal consideration too.

At Carlson Bier’s offices directly located outside Mokena city limits (as per Illinois’ strict locality guidelines), every client gains access to persistent pursuit towards justice against wrong-doers responsible for avoidable accidents while rendering support throughout stages including lawsuits or claims process – as quickest route may not necessarily prove most beneficial given diverse circumstances clients find themselves facing off post-accident.

Effectively dealing with slip and fall accidents require the involvement of legal experts like us who understand intricate details catering to Illinois laws on personal injuries. Our team initiates meticulous investigation once appointed – gathering evidence such as accident locations’ photographs, witness testimonies, or even scrutinizing maintenance records if necessary – all crucial factors towards solidifying your case in pursuit of justice and rightful compensation for undue hardships suffered.

Disclaimer: Every law differs from locality, state, or country to another; all translations across territories mustn’t be ignored while seeking damages that could potentially impact chances significantly within courtrooms when arguing points effectively against opposing council.

This extensive process you embark upon alongside Carlson Bier ends with our earnest attempt at achieving the best possible outcome for your situation. We firmly advocate your rights while navigating often complex pathway laid ahead comprised of negotiations with claim adjusters hailing from insurance companies intentionally trying devaluing valid claims through manipulations until composure gets disrupted within victims succumbing under pressure during these testing times.

Carlson Bier redoubles efforts fighting diligently against conglomerate interests intent on minimizing payouts — keeping client requirements at forefront throughout proceedings leading eventually down road wherein justice reigns supreme triumphing over adversity undoubtedly undergone by those finding themselves Knocked Down But Definitely Not Know Out!.

We invite you to take one step further with us – click on the button below that leads you straight towards discovering how much we can help you recover in damages stemming unexpectedly from such unfortunate incidents. Remember that Illinois requires personal injury lawsuits filed within two years post-accident date so without any more delays reach out today allowing Carlson Bier turning tide favorably back into your yard!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mokena Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mokena

Areas of Practice in Mokena

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing professional legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Extending specialist legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Tumble Incidents

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Extending legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents receive fair compensation for wounds and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Delivering specialist legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Committed to offering professional legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in assisting clients with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer