...

Car Accident Attorney in Neponset

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Neponset residents seeking top-notch car accident representation can strongly consider Carlson Bier, renowned for their proficiency in personal injury law. Renowned for swift actions and comprehensive legal support following vehicular incidents, they work diligently to safeguard clients’ rights while securing fair compensation for sustained damages. Their portfolio demonstrates repeated success in courtrooms thanks to their clear understanding of Illinois laws pertaining to automobile accidents—a testament to why they’re a prominent pick when needing dependable legal counsel following a collision. What truly sets this firm apart is the personalized attention each case receives—from initiation through resolution—ensuring that every client’s need and concern are addressed promptly by our team of experienced attorneys incapable of being rattled by even the most complex litigation situations. It isn’t just about winning; it’s about ensuring justice prevails at Carlson Bier—the epicenter of aggressive advocacy on your behalf after an auto accident scenario within Neponset or beyond, likely making you re-think all other options before considering any alternative firms due to their unmatched expertise and dedication towards clients’ welfare.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Neponset Illinois

As a premier law firm, Carlson Bier specializes in personal injury cases, ardently serving the individuals across Illinois who’ve faced the unfortunate repercussions of vehicular accidents. Our systematic approach to these complex cases has consistently brought relief and closure to our clients. We are particularly versed in boldly representing victims involved in car accidents.

Car accidents can be overwhelmingly distressful – not only physically but also emotionally and financially. Many people fail to fully comprehend their legal rights during such times or grapple to navigate through the labyrinth of legal procedures following an accident. At Carlson Bier, we painstakingly strive to fill this void. It’s our prime responsibility and commitment as your reliable personal injury attorney.

So how do we process? The first pivotal aspect lies within understanding that each case is unique; your situations, troubles and queries will surely differ from someone else’s experience with a similar circumstance. That’s why at Carlson Bier we liaise directly with you, investing considerable time comprehending your individual situation thoroughly before advising on any major legal decisions.

Awareness plays a crucial role when determining obligations after a car accident incident occurs:

• The Duty of Care: Driving safely and responsibly is more than just an ethical obligation; it’s infact legally mandated for everyone operating motor vehicles on public roadways.

• Breach: Failure adherence to ‘duty of care’ is classified as breach – any form of reckless driving (breakdowns such as speedy driving above the limit , distracted manoeuvers, DUI s) constitutes a breach.

• Causation: This addresses whether ‘breach’ led directly to one’s injuries.

• Damages: Were there quantifiable losses suffered by the defendant?

At Carlson Bier personal injury firm, we believe that educated clients make empowered decisions – every step taken towards building your defense case aims thereby reinforcing this regnant belief.

To reiterate our passionate advocacy for championing compensation rights underlined under the personal injury law, it is important to acknowledge that this compensation can cover a variety of damages after a car accident. Reimbursements could range from both economic and non-economic consequences of the incident – such as medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, loss of wages due to temporarly altered employability , mental agony , anguish and suffering.

Being carefully conscious about procedural deadlines (Statute of Limitations), merit investigation requirements, deciphering complex insurance documentation are other noteworthy aspects on which our distinguished team at Carlson Bier dedicate their operational unwavering efforts.

By illuminating these steps for you as your trusted legal partners in Illinois – with our customer-centric approach designed around your individual needs, we aim to provide holistic support while ensuring that no stone remains unturned in securing rightful justice.

With years worth cumulative practical experience to brace us coupled with compassionate client approach, presented throughout numerous landmark cases in Illinois- Carlson Bier proudly sports an illustrious record displaying relentless dedication towards victims recovering life post accidents.

On that note every potential client should understand they have opportunity knocking their door away – literally! By tapping into right resources at the right time to initiate claims process instead of procrastinating under emotional duress – significantly increases chances to garner much deserved financial relief . Click on the button below and let’s embark together on this journey empowering you regain control over life past nightmare inducing accidents. Knowledgeable power rests only a click away ! Allow us to assist utmost sincerity; know exactly how much your passionate fight against injustice is worth today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Neponset Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Neponset

Areas of Practice in Neponset

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing professional legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing specialist legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Accidents

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents get reasonable settlement for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering experienced legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Committed to defending clients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer