Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Olympia Fields

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury in Olympia Fields, one name stands supreme – Carlson Bier. Intense medical costs, continued care needs, and lost income compound emotional stress during this trying time. But you are not alone; our seasoned attorneys can steer you through the legal maze and protect your rights to just compensation with professional dexterity built on years of practice in Illinois’s judicial landscape. Carlson Bier specializes in advocating for those afflicted by commandingly challenging adversaries such as spinal cord injuries. Our team commits itself wholly to each case it undertakes, offering attention-to-detail that breeds success and ensures peace of mind for our clients along their journey towards recovery and justice . Overwhelming support reflected in our client reviews echoes testimonies about our tenacious negotiation skills coupled with compassionate service approach when coping with these horrendous injuries- reasons why you should consider us first amid an array of Spinal Cord Injuries attorney groups.Our dedication channels into action at every turn because we view your fight as ours too – so trust only the best – trust Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Olympia Fields Illinois

At the heart of Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury attorney group in Illinois, is the commitment to provide comprehensive legal support for individuals grappling with Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). SCIs are highly complex injuries, often leading to severe and lasting health repercussions. As such, navigating the often intricate journey toward obtaining rightfully due compensation can be a demanding challenge.

Spinal cord injuries typically fall into two primary categories — ‘Complete’ and ‘Incomplete.’ A Complete SCI results in total loss of function below the level of injury, while an Incomplete SCI indicates some functioning below the level of injury remains intact. With these categories further segmented into multitudes of specific conditions like paraplegia and quadriplegia among others, understanding its implications is essential.

• SCIs profoundly disrupt normal life functions: mobility restrictions affect occupational capacities, necessitating changes in living environments or professional roles.

• Prolonged rehabilitative treatment is key in managing SCI effects: persistent medical needs may demand significant lifestyle modifications and enduring financial impact.

• Psychological challenges often accompany physical ones: individuals may face emotional distress or mental health issues when adjusting to post-injury life.

Presenting possibilities that stretch far beyond immediate physical harm, spinal cord injuries significantly affect victims’ lives on multifaced levels. Facilitating quality representation for these clients sets Carlson Bier apart from other attempts at detailing this broad topic.

Comprehending insurances’ role adds further complexity to matters needing insightful consideration. Insurances centralize around categorizations such as Personal Injury Protection (PIP), Liability Insurance, Health insurance and more—each distinct but interconnected. These interactions within overlapping systems link up to influence individual entitlements.

• Navigating PIP versus liability claims becomes crucial after motor accidents: determining fault impacts coverage options.

• Understanding how insurances coordinate benefits bolsters opportunities for optimizing compensations: certain procedures guide ranking policies concerning coverage applications.

Such dynamics remain integral facets requiring detailed understanding. At Carlson Bier, we extend our specialized services with integrative strategies aimed at ensuring clients reach rightful settlements.

As experts in the intricate configurations of medico-legal intersections in spinal cord injury cases, we utilize an approach rooted in compassionate dedication and rigorous knowledge. Each case receives tailored solutions reflecting personal circumstances paired seamlessly with legal parameters. Whether managing negotiations with insurance companies or leading litigation for fair compensation, we readily stand as today’s informed advocates fighting for tomorrow’s justice.

• Using detailed medical evidence is crucial: precise documentation substantiates claims’ validity and impacts how much can be recovered.

• Litigation isn’t always necessary: skilled lawyer negotiation often leads to faster resolutions and reduced stress from court proceedings.

A spinal cord injury is more than a momentary event. Its rippling effects continually renew challenges faced by affected individuals—financial struggles from excessive medical costs integrate inseparably with strained personal relations, severed work ties, and impaired quality of life experiences over time.

Therein lies the invisible impact—the everyday battles transcending visible disabilities but felt deeply within lives changed by SCI incidents. These hidden facets necessitate looking beyond mere compensations extending into advocating holistic recovery routes to reinstate life normalcy as closely as possible even amidst ingrained changes.

To find your guiding light through these complex intertwinements toward potential relief spaces—click on the button below . Unlock valuable insights into what your case might be valued at when standing before leverages that you can contestably claim. Let us navigate together this demanding crossroads where law transacts with health burdens—a crossroad seeking resolution while voicing heartfelt humanity beneath every claim pursued.

Remember—you’re not alone in this discourse of rights against wrongs; you have powerful allies ready to fight on your behalf. Empower yourself now by taking the first brave step towards claiming what’s rightfully yours.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Olympia Fields Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Olympia Fields

Areas of Practice in Olympia Fields

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving adept legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Providing expert legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents gain just compensation for injuries and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Providing expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Building Site Crashes

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in extending expert legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Damage

Specializing in supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer