FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Olympia Fields

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As bicycle accidents increase in Olympia Fields, it is critical to have a competent attorney represent your interests. Carlson Bier has made its mark as a proficient Bicycle Accidents attorney team. Although we’re based in Illinois, our services extend widely and are easily accessible for residents of many localities including Olympia Fields. Our extensive experience with personal injury law places us ahead of others in assessing cases and delivering optimum results. We understand the pain that these mishappenings may inflict on victims; thus, we provide tenacious representation to ensure you receive appropriate compensation for your suffering or loss. Dealing with insurance companies demands prowess—a strength innate in our attorneys at Carlson Bier—who adeptly cut through complex layers ensuring maximum recoveries for clients. Assertive advocacy combined with evaluated strategies personifies our legal acumen aimed at protecting victim’s rights post accidents.Illinois citizens can never go wrong entrusting their case to Carlson Bier: the name synonymous with excellence when considering Bicycle Accident lawyers.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Olympia Fields Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be overwhelming. Our team of skilled and experienced personal injury attorneys, based in Illinois, are committed to providing you with clear, comprehensive guidance as you navigate through these challenging times. Cycling accidents often result in complex legal scenarios which require expertise and precision. We exist to ensure you get the justice and compensation you deserve.

A significant part of our practice involves representing victims of bicycling accidents who have suffered injuries due to another’s negligence. Understanding how these events occur can be crucial for your case:

• Bicycle Versus Vehicle Accidents: These types of incidents frequently happen due to motorists not respecting cyclists’ space on the road or being negligent about sharing lanes.

• Dooring Accidents: This occurs when an automobile driver or passenger suddenly opens a door directly into a cyclist’s path causing them to crash into it.

• Roadway and Sidewalk Defects: Potholes, debris, lack of appropriate signage or unsafe road conditions are common causes of cycling accidents.

Despite wearing protective gear like helmets and high-visibility clothing, bicyclists are much more exposed than motor vehicle occupants during an accident. Injuries sustained may range from severe fractures and traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) to devastating spinal cord injuries. The costs associated with treating these injuries can be extensive thereby imposing heavy emotional and financial burdens on victims.

Our team at Carlson Bier specializes in proving liability following a bicycle accident by conducting meticulous investigations which involve collecting evidence such as police reports, photographs from the scene, statements from eye-witnesses, medical documents outlining the nature and severity of your injuries along with any other relevant information necessary for building a compelling case.

At Carlson Bier, we also provide invaluable insights concerning possible claim avenues including:

• Personal Injury Protection Benefits: Your own insurance policy might cover some medical expenses or income loss if applicable.

• Uninsured Motorist Claim: If the at-fault driver doesn’t possess enough insurance to cover your injuries or is uninsured, you may be entitled to compensation from your own insurer.

• Product Liability Claim: If the accident was caused by a faulty bike part or safety equipment, we could potentially initiate a claim against the manufacturer for product liability.

It’s important to note Illinois has a two-year limitation period that applies to bicycle accident cases which means any legal proceedings must begin within this time-frame post-incident. Our attorneys will ensure all necessary steps are taken promptly, so as not to forfeit your rights due to technicalities.

Navigating through the maze of personal injury law can seem daunting but with Carlson Bier on your side, rest assured that our unwavering commitment and legal expertise will serve as an unyielding backbone throughout your case. We strive relentlessly towards pursuing maximum compensation for your losses because we firmly believe no one should bear undue burdens on account of another’s negligence.

Time can significantly impact the effectiveness of evidence gathering vital for proving liability in personal injury cases such as these. Thus, it becomes crucially important for you not only seek immediate medical attention following an incident but reach out to us expeditiously as well.

With every case being specific and distinct in its formation and resolution, accurately valuing it without thorough examination becomes improbable. Therefore, our team at Carlson Bier is committed to providing personalized consultations tailored precisely according to the nuances of your circumstance.

You deserve nothing less than outstanding representation during this difficult time – lean on Carlson Bier where compassion meets competence for securing fair restitution. Don’t leave what is rightfully yours up for speculation – click on the button below now and let us assist you in assessing exactly how much your case could potentially be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Olympia Fields Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Olympia Fields

Areas of Practice in Olympia Fields

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing skilled legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for harms and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Offering specialist legal advice for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​