FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Olympia Fields

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When enduring the traumatic aftermath of a dog bite injury in Olympia Fields, engaging with an expert legal group like Carlson Bier is crucial. Renowned for their relentless representation in personal injury cases, they bring formidable acumen to any Dog Bite Injuries case. With commendable insights into Illinois law and decades worth encounter navigating complex personal injury claims resulting from animal attacks, they’ve successfully safeguarded the rights and interests of many clients. They endeavor to alleviate your distress by assuring that you receive fair compensation for your physical injuries as well as emotional trauma following a dog bite incident. Their competent evaluation skills arm them to properly value pain and suffering caused by such incidents ensuring you don’t sell yourself short on deserved recovery expenses or compensation at either negotiation table or court trials. When seeking justice after unfortunate encounters with unruly dogs in Olympia Fields, remember – nothing beats having Carlson Bier’s proficiency protecting your best interests! Find solace knowing that this esteemed law firm stands ready to fight fiercely on all fronts involving Dog Bite Injuries matters!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Olympia Fields Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re a trusted source of legal counsel for personal injury cases, with a significant emphasis on Dog Bite Injuries. We prioritize the well-being and justice of our clients in Illinois, delivering results that convert predicaments into peace. As experienced personal injury attorneys, we understand that dog bite injuries can be traumatizing both physically and emotionally. Therefore, we dedicate our expertise towards offering comprehensive guidance through such challenging times.

Dog bites can result in various kinds of injuries – from nerve damage and bacterial infections to psychological trauma. They may require costly medical treatment or therapy and could lead to loss of earnings due to an inability to work during recovery. The law acknowledges these consequences by delineating ways in which victims can claim for damages:

1. Medical expenses: You may recover the cost incurred for all past, present, and future medical treatments associated directly with your dog bite.

2. Pain and suffering: This includes potential physical discomfort resulting from the incident as well as emotional distress.

3. Lost wages: If you lose income due to healing time away from work or incapacity resulting from the attack.

Navigating through intricate laws becomes less challenging when armed with knowledge about your rights as a dog bite victim under Illinois Law:

• One-Bite Rule: Contrary to its name, this rule doesn’t mean dogs get “one free bite”. It requires proof linking previous aggression or viciousness of the pet to establish liability.

• Strict Liability Rule: Under this principle, dog owners are held accountable whether they knew their dogs might be aggressive or not; unless you were trespassing or provoking the animal at the time it attacked.

Complex legal terminologies often complicate understanding nuances around Dog Bite Laws; hence, professional intervention is brimming with advantages. At Carlson Bier we help you uphold your rights using strategic law procedures focusing on honesty and transparency at each step:

• Evaluation—We start by delving deep into your individual case basis, fact-checking and accumulating necessary documents.

• Wraparound services—From legal advisory to court representation; we offer all-encompassing aid.

• Acute attention to your feelings—Acknowledging that you’re more than just a client, we maintain sensitivity towards your emotional healing while strategically protecting your interests.

Upon receiving immediate medical care post a dog bite incident, it is adviseable to contact an experienced personal injury attorney. Prompt legal action can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Moreover, Illinois law implements a two-year statutory limit on personal injury cases starting from the date of incidence; hence timely consultation with attorneys is crucial in averting any legal forfeiture.

Teaming up with Carlson Bier for pursuing justice does not imply unbearable costs; our payment policy revolves around contingency fees – meaning, if we don’t win settlements or verdicts in favour for you, no financial responsibility accrues amidst our clients. Henceforth creating worry-free experiences over monetary considerations!

Often overlooked yet potent repercussions from dog bites are psychological effects like anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We recognize this and guide victims regarding potential compensation availability for such therapeutic expenditures too along with physical injuries’ assessment.

Carlson Bier’s commitment extends beyond mere transactional values of law practice – we take pride in educating clients about their rights while providing robust representation to ensure maximum damages recovery. Our mission is aligned towards integrating value with veracity as seen through countless favourable outcomes delivered till date!

Curious how much worth stands behind your case? Don’t let the curiosity simmer! Empower yourself by finding out now. Delve into our resources or better yet discuss live with us- remember detailed insights remain just a click away courtesy our dedicated team at Carlson Bier. Start by clicking on the button below right away—you might be surprised at what you discover!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Olympia Fields Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Olympia Fields

Areas of Practice in Olympia Fields

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing expert legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Extending professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Trip Incidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents obtain just compensation for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending professional legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on extending expert legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Dedicated to representing clients with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440