...

Personal Injury Attorney in Philo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing personal injury legalities in Philo, turn to Carlson Bier – with a track record of success and vast expertise in handling such cases. Carlson Bier’s committed team is thorough at navigating the labyrinthine intricacies that shroud personal Injury law, leveraging their knowledge for your ultimate benefit. Recognized as exemplary in the field, they consistently bring clarity to complex situations through genuine care about each client’s unique context. Their unmatched skills allow them to confront any stumbling block efficiently while protecting your interests meticulously throughout the process. Trustworthy and compassionate, they approach every concern with personalized consideration; providing relief even amidst uncertainty or fear following distressing incidents leading to physical harm. As tireless advocates of justice for those wronged due to others’ negligence or intentional harm-actions around ones’ safety & wellbeing, think no further than Carlson Bier when contemplating starting on an aggressive pursuit towards fair compensation within this tortuous judicial run rooted primarily by disturbing events causing personal injuries as wrongly suffered victims tendentially needing legitimate recourse around Philo’s precincts!

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Philo Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your foremost Illinois-based personal injury attorneys. We are driven by a passion for justice and strive to help you navigate the often-complex world of personal injury law. This process can be intimidating; hence our dedication in providing clear, accessible, and valuable information here.

Personal injury refers to any type of harm – physical or emotional – that a person suffers due to someone else’s negligence or wrongful actions. These injuries could stem from various situations including auto accidents, medical malpractice, workplace hazards, slip and falls among others. Understanding the nuances of these categories can greatly impact your case’s outcome:

• Auto Accidents: Victims may claim compensation for injuries sustained in automobile accidents caused by another party’s negligence.

• Medical Malpractice: If healthcare professionals fail to provide adequate care resulting in harm or injury, they may be held accountable.

• Workplace Hazards: Employers must ensure employee safety. If their negligence leads to accident or injury at work place, affected parties have the right to seek recompense.

• Slip and Fall Cases: Business owners’ failure in maintaining safe premises can lead them liable should customers suffer an injury while on their property.

Our legal prowess is rooted in comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of Illinois state laws regarding personal injuries which we apply towards the relentless pursuit of justice for our clients. As each case brings unique circumstances pertaining to fault, extent of injuries suffered and subsequent associated costs Severely injured victims may be eligible for not just recovery of incurred expenses like medical bills but also compensation for lost wages due its impact on earning capacity as well as possible pain suffering damages Let us lend our experience talent towards building robust cases tailored specifically around individual client needs.

Initiating legal action might seem overwhelming at first given myriad formalities intricacies Increasingly however more individuals choose professional representation instead opting handle matters themselves Your decision secure experienced qualified attorney yield significant benefits Firstly it ensures errors not compromise whole case Secondly counsel invaluable helping understand options navigational rights Lastly they can deal insurance companies necessary negotiations on behalf.

It’s crucial to know that in Illinois, prompt action is critical. The statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of the accident. Failure to file within this time period could potentially forfeit your right to compensation. Thus, early consultation with a lawyer can make all the difference.

As committed defenders we equip you concrete advice guide potential pitfalls uncertainty Upholding commitment transparent practice we maintain open channels of communication update progress case terms win acknowledge fact recovery process often tedious exhausting Every positive verdict fuels our dedication resilient advocates clients making us leading choice personal injury attorneys across state Illinois.

Now that you’re better informed about personal injury law and what it entails, are you ready take next step? Our expertise honed over years just click away At Carlson Bier we prepare negotiate advocate zeal manner sustains esteemed reputation Increasingly our preferred approach has been fostering client relationships founded trust assurance An initial free consultation would allow greater understanding how strategize appropriately best interest mind Maximizing settlement retaining full compensation focus here.

Are you wondering about potential value your case purse? Click button below for an immediate evaluation Together through perseverance championing justice collaborate bring closure chapter life Start journey us today; because at Carlson Bier – We believe getting highest possible benefit our clients due right not privilege

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Philo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Philo

Areas of Practice in Philo

Bicycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing professional legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering professional legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering expert legal services to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Accidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for injuries and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Providing professional legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Trauma

Focused on supporting persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer