FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Pinckneyville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re the victim of a construction site accident in Pinckneyville, then Carlson Bier is your ally in pursuing justice. As proficient personal injury attorneys, we bring adept legal representation to those who suffer from construction mishaps. Accidents on construction sites may result in life-changing injuries or worse; fatalities. With an intricately complex field like workers’ compensation laws and civil liability rules governing these accidents, it is crucial for victims to seek proper legal counsel and protection through capable firms like Carlson Bier. We shine at unraveling convoluted case details, with keyword focus being commitment and tenacity while litigating for our clients. Injured parties can trust us to unearth negligent behaviors that contributed their afflictions. Precisely why settling for nothing less than justified compensations against guilty counterparts is our unyielding aim— irrespective of potential culprits being contractors or co-workers causing the casualty due to neglectful conduct within Illinois’s terms of lawful accountability towards laborer safety codes and regulations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Pinckneyville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing legal representation for individuals involved in construction site accidents in Illinois. Leveraging unmatched experience and professional competence, our team of personal injury attorneys delivers personalized assistance to claimants seeking compensation for injuries sustained at construction sites.

Construction site accidents come with numerous complications as the arena involves multiple parties such as workers, contractors, supervisors, architects and machinery operators functioning concurrently. If an accident occurs on a construction site, it is critical to correctly identify the responsible party or parties. Our qualified team at Carlson Bier ensures thorough investigation of your case by collaborating closely with experts like safety inspectors and engineers to examine all possible causes and circumstances linked to the incident.

Our clients often inquire about common types of construction site incidents that may give rise to personal injury claims. These encompass:

• Falls from heights such as roofs or ladders: Attentive usage of safety harnesses can significantly reduce risks.

• Scaffolding collapses: Proper supervision over scaffolding assembly is imperative.

• Electrocutions from exposed wires or malfunctioning power tools: Modern electrical safety measures are crucial

• Cave-ins or trench collapses due to improper bracing: The OSHA has strict guidelines for digging procedures.

• Struck by falling objects due to lack of overhead protection mechanisms: Elevated platforms must have protective guardrails.

These scenarios highlight just some potential areas where negligence may result in severe injury or fatality and articulate why engaging a knowledgeable lawyer might be essential.

Carlson Bier provides comprehensive assistance throughout each stage of your case processing beginning with claiming damages under workers’ compensation law through filing third-party lawsuits if warranted. From effectively negotiating settlements aided by accurately calculated estimates of lifetime medical costs and lost earning capacity; through representing you aggressively in litigation whenever necessary–we ensure you are not short-changed while securing the justice you deserve.

Understanding comparative-fault rules plays a substantive role when dealing with claims involving injured construction workers. In Illinois, if your own negligence contributed to the accident, this will proportionally reduce your recoverable damages. Skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier foresee possible challenges by considering variables such as comparative fault when plan strategize to bring forth winning arguments and maximize rightful compensation.

A key benefit of Carlson Bier services is our ‘No Win – No Fee’ agreement. It signifies that there’s no financial risk in approaching us for help with your construction site accident case; you’ll pay nothing unless we secure a victory for you.

While time is an essential factor after an incident, it remains crucial to avoid rushing into ill-advised settlements without understanding Illinois’s strict statute of limitations on personal injury claims and implications concerning your specific situation. Therefore, we caution against delaying communications with our competent attorneys who are ready to guide you each step of the way leading towards comprehensive claim mediation or litigation proceedings.

Let Carlson Bier be your ally in recuperation from a construction site accident aftermath. Trust our proven track record fueled by unwavering commitment towards safeguarding client interests–which simultaneously upholds high standards of legal practice in Illinois. Rest assured, we’re not located in Pinckneyville; however, our proficient attorneys can assist clients across numerous regions within Illinois boundaries effectively utilizing digital collaboration technology when necessary.

We strongly urge you not to agree on any insurance company settlement before exploring options with a seasoned personal injury lawyer who truly understands intricate details surrounding construction site accidents. This proactive measure could potentially translate into much higher compensation amounts than what initial offers may suggest. Click on the button below now for an obligation-free evaluation of how much your case could realistically be worth within prevailing legal norms in Illinois – Entrust us with serving justice rightfully owed to you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pinckneyville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Pinckneyville

Areas of Practice in Pinckneyville

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, offering adept legal support to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Collision

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on delivering specialized legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440