Construction Site Accident Attorney in Plainfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a construction site accident, reliable law representation is essential. Carlson Bier, renowned personal injury lawyers in Illinois, are equipped to handle such cases effectively and efficiently. Our keen insight into the complexity of construction site litigation equips us with a robust skillset for securing the desired outcomes for our clients. Each case we take on undergoes careful navigation through layers of legal stipulations that govern Occupational Health & Safety Administration guidelines often breached when accidents occur on construction sites in various locales including Plainfield. As empathetic litigators amidst these challenging times, we prioritize your welfare as you go through recovery while investing every necessary resource towards pursuing fair compensation from liable parties at fault. Honoring utmost confidentiality in all proceedings gives assurance to our clientele about their privacy being respected with utmost integrity during an undoubtedly difficult period.Carlson Bier brings forth formidable advocate services at each client engagement stage right from managing procedural paperwork, communication negotiation till ultimately attaining sought justice representing comprehensive professional acumen gleaned over years of serving diverse personal injury scenario demands.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Plainfield Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted partner in personal injury law. As a renowned and respected law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in Construction Site Accidents, dedicating our expertise to fighting for victims of such incidents who have experienced avoidable pain and suffering due to the negligence of others.

Construction sites can be notoriously dangerous environments. Sturdy materials, lofty heights, heavy machinery – all these moving elements combined with tight deadlines often lead to precarious circumstances awaiting an unfortunate accident.

Several types of accidents commonly occur on construction sites such as:

• Slip and fall incidents from scaffoldings or ladders

• Machinery-related injuries involving cranes, bulldozers or other heavy equipment

• Falling object injuries where items like tools or building materials strike workers below

• Trench collapses that trap workers under soil and rubble

Each year countless construction workers sustain severe injuries while working on-site; sometimes these situations sadly lead even to loss of life. Together, they reveal a portrait of riskiness intrinsic within the domain of construction workspaces.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that you are not just another statistic – applying justice should ensure fair compensation is reached for injury suffered on construction site terrain. No individual deserves dismissal of their discomfort or shrugging off their agonizing experience – especially when it’s related so intimately with what is usually a person’s livelihood – their job.

Our attorneys are immensely skilled in conducting thorough investigations following a construction site accident: identifying liable parties and connecting them reliably through solid chains of evidence; analyzing work conditions prior to the accident to potentially identify neglectful shortcomings that may have led up to said event; speaking effectively on your behalf amidst intricate insurance claims processes for maximum positive end result towards your relief.

Sustaining an injury on-site leads not only physical damage but also exerts weighty stress from financial burdens stemming from medical bills, rehabilitative care costs along with potential loss wages during recuperation periods. Our team’s extensive experience navigating the complex world of personal injury law empowers your pursuit for retribution, understanding that no financial compensation can truly make up for what you’ve lost – but in such dire moments, every little bit helps.

In a realm where legal processes may seem intimidating, jargon dense and compensation opaque – we at Carlson Bier strive to make these procedures approachable, steadfastly standing by you throughout your fight. Think not twice thus before reaching to us when faced with such unfortunate doors; be assured our seasoned group of lawyers will guide seamlessly along the winding roads towards justice.

Navigating through construction site accidents lawsuits doesn’t have to be an ordeal you face alone. We understand how taxing it is just to get up each day since that unfortunate event, let alone deal with mounting medical bills and dismissal from insurance companies deprived of empathy. Let us shoulder those difficult aspects for you while focusing on what matters most – healing physically and mentally.

Trust Carlson Bier beyond mere resolution of your case – we believe in enriching our clients knowledge about their precise circumstances surrounding construction site accidents; whether understanding intricacies related with OSHA standards compliance or comprehending grounds wherein employers’ negligence applies– indulge in a detailed exploration of these under expert guidance right at our outlet.

Don’t let any doubts cloud over the next steps for action after having suffered a construction accident site injury. Contained within this conundrum is also potential for paving towards restorative fulfillment mitigated through rightful indemnification – and we are here to walk together down this path with courage and conviction. Check out now by clicking the button beneath -find out how much could potentially be worth your case upon pursuing justice resiliently against construction site accident implications; embark onto turning something adverse into something empowering!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Plainfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Plainfield

Areas of Practice in Plainfield

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal assistance for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Stumble Injuries

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Committed to helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Providing professional legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on providing compassionate legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Focused on assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer