FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in River Forest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the complexities of construction site accidents, seeking proficient legal representation is crucial. Carlson Bier’s unrivaled ability to provide this service has made them a leading consideration for those seeking justice following such incidents in River Forest. Rooted in extensive experience and superior understanding of personal injury law, particularly as it relates to workplace mishaps, their attorneys offer expert assistance designed to secure your rights effectively. Equipped with comprehensive knowledge about Illinois’ safety regulations and worker’s compensation laws, they consistently deliver results that stand up against even the most stringent scrutiny – an assurance backed by their impressive track record across numerous successful cases. By choosing Carlson Bier as your partner through these challenging times you enable yourself better chances at recovery– not just medically but legally too — giving peace-of-mind that arguably no dream house or tall building can match! For anyone facing the aftermath of a construction site accident in River Forest; true strength lies with Carlson Bier–a firm known both for its services aimed at safeguarding clients’ futures and an unwavering commitment towards justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in River Forest Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of seasoned personal injury attorneys has earned a reputation as strong advocates for those injured on construction sites throughout Illinois. We understand the complexities and unique risks associated with the construction industry and are dedicated to protecting your rights, whether you’re an employee on a worksite or an innocent bystander impacted by a construction accident.

Construction site accidents can happen in a multitude of ways ranging from falls, mishandling or malfunctioning equipment, structural collapses to electrical accidents among many others. The consequences of such incidents often lead to debilitating injuries that include broken bones, head injuries, spinal cord damage, amputations and sadly enough in some severe cases fatalities. It is essential to note that every case is different–accidents may involve differing levels of responsible parties including contractors/subcontractors/property owners/general liability insurers/workers’ compensation carriers.

State law mandates specific safety regulations that all construction companies must adhere to ensure their work environments do not pose hazards capable of producing harmful consequences. Employers also hold responsibilities under workers’ compensation laws which seek to provide certain financial checks for employees sustaining injurious outcomes while dutifully serving their occupational roles. However in situations where third-party negligence is determined as causative factors – think equipment manufacturers providing faulty devices – victims have legal grounds pursue additional action outside workers’ comp claims against these entities.

Builders struggling under demanding deadlines can be tempted into taking shortcuts leading critical oversights with devastating ramifications though it should never excuse anyone’s disregard for safety practices promised within contractual agreements; more so when they result in life-altering events making injured parties incapable resuming life norms accepting unforeseen physical emotional burdens placed upon them through no fault own yet still deserving full justifiable compensation attainable recovery losses courageously bearing burden monumental hardship resulting catastrophic occurrences perpetuated wrongful conduct negligent participants causing unfortunate circumstances encounter whatever task at hand seems fit remediate ergo illuminating glimmers hope rekindling extinguished candles perfectly mirroring glimmers hope that once radiated brightly.

Your next steps after experiencing a construction site accident should involve promptly seeking medical attention, reporting the incident to your manager or supervisor, documenting everything and speaking with an experienced personal injury lawyer from our firm. It’s also crucial to keep in mind that not all complications related to injuries are immediately apparent. As such, it is imperative to wait until you’ve achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI) under the careful guidance of health experts before deciding whether any settlement offer made is worth your while.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that enduring a construction site injury leaves victims facing substantial losses including hefty healthcare bills, diminished income flow due to missing work whilst recovering and intense emotional strain considering their uncertain futures. Considering these hardships faced by victimized clients; every case handled promises utmost dedication offering expert legal counsel tirelessly working towards procuring maximum claim settlements easing financial burdens endured solidifying pathways towards health restoration hence regaining hoped-for lifestyles intended rightfully journeys undertaken prior becoming unsuspecting construction site accident victims.

Without needing upfront payments for our services offered – adopting contingency-fee arrangements only requiring compensation paid through successful litigation outcomes assures no fees warranted if no recovery attained making justice accessible ensuring those suffering most in dire need possessing powerful attorneys skillfully vigilant tenaciously unwavering pursuit journey heading onto road towards fair equitable dispensation expected served righteously dispatched simply choosing trust deploy unconditional faith dedicated hearts minds team proudly representing distinguished title carrying weighty honor being “Carlson Bier.”

After navigating through this wealth of information concerning construction accidents presented here at Carlson Bier’s commanding expertise regarding such matters feel based comprehension retention surely realised level attainment increased tremendously given newfound enlightenment regard subject broader spectrum. Therefore invites queries intrigued interested potential clients seeking gain insights concerning individualistic cases parties involved may hold causative factors explored further highlighted within custom tailored solutions beneficial accommodating addressed unique scenarios applicable turning tides favor varying circumstances resulting brighter future outlooks drawn unto rightful realisation anticipated outcomes.

If you are battling the aftermath of a construction site accident, do not face this challenging period alone. Click on the button below to take advantage of our free case evaluation tool and find out how much your case is worth. At Carlson Bier, we’ll put your needs first as we meticulously work towards securing compensation worthy of your pain and suffering. Let us provide support to get back on track; schedule a consultation with one of our experienced personal injury lawyers today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For River Forest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in River Forest

Areas of Practice in River Forest

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering expert legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Offering expert legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents get just payout for damages and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Building Incidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Focused on delivering expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Focused on advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440