FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Roselle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing a personal injury, finding the right attorney can make all the difference in your case outcome. Carlson Bier is an eminent law firm that you can trust with a reputation for excellence and commitment to client advocacy throughout Illinois. Specializing in personal injury law, we are esteemed within our field because of our broad experience handling complex cases efficiently and successfully. Our qualified attorneys dedicate their extensive knowledge towards achieving justice for individuals who suffer due to negligence or wrongdoings of others – whether it’s workplace accidents, vehicle collisions or medical malpractice etc.

Putting clients first is at the heart of our practice philosophy at Carlson Bier; we provide expert consultation while navigating complicated legal processes on your behalf ensuring smooth progression towards justice and compensation that you rightly deserve.

Our uncompromised dedication to obtaining rightful results means no stone goes unturned to deliver both moral support as well as skillful representation till your claim reaches completion.

In light of needing professional legal assistance in Roselle, entrusting Carlson Bier allows steps toward securing optimal outcomes. Through meticulous investigation mixed with strategic planning based on years of experience – we serve as dynamic advocates providing superior service irrespective of obstacles encountered during course proceedings paving a way forward amidst adversity. Your journey through restorative justice begins here!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Roselle Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we recognize that navigating the world of personal injury law can be overwhelming, particularly when you’re healing from an incident. As your dedicated Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, our role is to explain, guide and advocate for you during these trying times. Personal injury cases revolve around lawsuits brought by an individual (the plaintiff) who has been harmed due to the negligence or intentional act of another person or entity (the defendant). injuries can stem from a variety of incidents – roadside accidents, slips and falls at places of work or public areas, medical malpractice claims, dog bites among many others.

Understanding the value you receive from partnering with an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier is essential in reaching a favorable outcome. Allow us to provide some useful insights into this process:

• Expert Representation – Our devoted lawyers are highly skilled in negotiating with insurance companies on your behalf ensuring maximum compensation for damages.

• Comprehensive understanding of Illinois Personal Injury Laws – We remain continually updated about state-specific laws and litigation trends which enable us to construct solid cases for our clients.

• Detailed Investigation – Our resourceful team carries out exhaustive investigations related to your case using various methods such as witness interview, surveillance footage amongst other strategies aiming towards building substantial evidence.

• Contingency Fee structure – At Carlson Bier we adopt a ‘no win no fees’ policy meaning that until we secure the right settlement for you, we do not charge any legal fees.

Damage recovery in personal injury cases generally includes compensations aligned with medical bills (both past and future), lost wages due to inability to work after an accident and intangible damages like pain and suffering or emotional distress endured as a result of said incident. The goal at Carlson Bier is pursuing full restoration for our valued clients in terms of financial stability after a damaging situation leaving them completely covered against all foreseeable outcomes.

Moreover navigating through possible defense assertions by opposing parties can indeed be cumbersome. Your opponent might argue contributory negligence i.e. they may claim that your own carelessness partially led to the injury, placing a-portion of the blame on you and thus minimizing their liability. It’s critical to have an experienced lawyer alongside who can capably deflect these allegations highlighting client innocence.

At Carlson Bier we believe in open lines of communication. We assure our clients consistent updates about case progressions keeping them well advised at every juncture letting them make informed decisions holding long-term implications. Trust us to be passionate advocates relentlessly seeking justice for you as well as reparations needed to move forward after an injury event.

Finally, it’s important to note that a statute of limitations applies in Illinois which provides a two-year time frame after the personal injury incident date within which legal proceedings must be initiated against a party deemed responsible for causing damages. This underlines the urgency of engaging with a specialized lawyer promptly post-accident allowing sufficient documentation collection and effective settlement negotiations.

We understand that many questions and concerns may still linger—rest assured, we’re here to address each one. Here at Carlson Bier, we don’t merely offer representation – we stand by your side through every step towards reclaiming your peace of mind. If you’ve been inflicted with injuries due to another party’s negligence or intentional conduct reach out us today – simply click on the button below for invaluable insights into how much your case could potentially be worth; explore concrete actions aligned seamlessly with your best interests ensuring wellbeing in all its dimensions.. With Carlson Bier at your helm allow calmness replace chaos, clarity substitute confusion all while respecting sensitivity surrounding personal injury distress – connect today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roselle Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Roselle

Areas of Practice in Roselle

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving adept legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering experienced legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Occurrences

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate payout for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Extending experienced legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Impairments

Specializing in providing dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in defending victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​