FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Saint Francisville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have experienced a construction site accident in Saint Francisville, look no further than Carlson Bier for legal assistance. Renowned for their determined approach, our attorneys strive to pursue justice thoroughly and tenaciously. A key advantage of partnering with us is our wealth of experience in handling complex cases specifically related to construction site accidents; we understand the unique intricacies that come with this particular field. The team at Carlson Bier is deeply committed to obtain maximum compensations for their clients while assuring all possible angles are meticulously examined when building your case. With an impressive track record supporting us, it’s clear why many injured workers turn towards Carlson Bier for expertise and guidance following such incidents. We believe that every injured worker deserves high-quality legal presentation, aimed at ensuring rightful compensation and promoting safer workplaces across our community hereafter. Despite location constraints, rest assured that working with us makes access to top-notch Illinois-based construction accident lawyers possible without compromise on service quality or results! Trust Carlson Bier- Your advocate after devastating accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Saint Francisville Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted partners in Illinois, dedicated to asserting the rights of personal injury victims involved in Construction Site Accidents. Understanding the complexities associated with these accidents is crucial; let’s dive into an insightful exploration of kinks and details woven into such mishaps.

Construction Sites are notorious for putting workers at risk due to their dynamic and hazardous nature. Various intricate factors can contribute to accidents; irrespective of the exact cause, injuries sustained on a construction site can be severe or life-altering. From bruises and broken bones to concussion trauma and amputations—every incident calls for recognition, reparation, and rightful legal action.

Unveiling some key aspects related to Construction Site Accidents helps elucidate how claims materialize:

– Negligence: It’s imperative that safety guidelines are stringently adhered to on construction sites. A lapse could be tantamount to negligence— a prominent ground for filing personal injury claims.

– Machinery Mishaps: Frequent interaction with heavy machinery is inherent in industry protocol. Inadequate training or faulty equipment often lead to catastrophic results.

– Falling Objects: Loosely tethered tools or materials may result in ‘Struck-by’ incidents where falling objects inflict harm.

– Scaffolding Collapse: Improperly erected or maintained scaffolds put those working aloft at precarious heights under serious threat.

– Exposure Hazards: Prolonged contact with harmful substances leads not only immediate harm but also chronic health conditions like mesothelioma.

At Carlson Bier, we bring ample experience battling cases traversing these areas. Our commitment lies firm – ensuring our clients receive adequate compensation matched only by invaluable peace-of-mind.

A well-formulated case brings clarity about entitlements you might be unaware of initially – disability settlement, lost wages during recuperation periods, payments addressing emotional strain post-trauma etcetera hold immense significance in fair rectification trajectories. Consulting a skilled personal injury attorney not only guides you through these but also ensures there’s no stone unturned in seeking justice.

Drawing upon our years of practicing law across Illinois, we’ve mastered the art of navigating its legal terrains. Our advocacy goes beyond providing exemplary legal services. It extends into helping clients understand their rights, informing them about possible outcomes while holding steadfast to a staunch principle: ‘Hope for the best but be prepared for the worst.’

Securing financial responsibilities is essential—whether it’s medical expenses today or contingencies tomorrow. We relentlessly strive towards this goal and won’t rest until one can confidently say they’ve received every dime owed to them; with Carlson Bier, expect nothing less than persistence and dedication every step of the way.

Transparency forms an immutable cornerstone of our core values at Carlson Bier. No fine print losses meaning amidst complex jargon; clients remain apprised from start to finish as we journey towards resolution together- getting questions answered promptly, understanding what’s transpiring, and having absolute faith that your interests remain paramount throughout.

Moreover, remember you’re never alone in such obstacles encountered. Practical guidance tied with compassion is what sets us apart —rest assured knowing someone understands how overwhelming these situations could be and awaits readiness to advocate yours uncompromisingly.

The aftermath of construction site accidents could be daunting with battles on health protruding into realms of finance and emotions easily taking a toll on peace-of-mind—a reassuring hand leading one through tumultuous times makes all the difference whilst being far from symbolic only as our track record asserts firmly.

Don’t let mounting concerns impede your path towards laying rightful claim post a Construction Site Accident; time might mock severity incurred while procedures intimidate persistence required – shake off shackles bound by uncertainty under professional direction readily available merely clicks away.

Take action now and explore better perspectives threading your future by clicking on the button below—it leads not just towards valuation but allows equipping oneself with knowledge and understanding you deserve. Let’s combat these challenging paces together, guiding how best to assert T’s crossed and I’s dotted promptly by giving your case the justice it deserves. Claim your moment now— find out just how much your case could be worth on legally apt grounds while retaining complete faith in its value being truly realized at Carlson Bier; because helping clients isn’t just our occupation – it remains an unyielding passion resonating deep within our ethos. Your struggle evolves into ours equally as we strive ceaselessly until rightful justice unfurls taking you towards a brighter tomorrow where dreams of fairness not only thrive but conquer indeed.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Francisville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Saint Francisville

Areas of Practice in Saint Francisville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering expert legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate payout for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Providing adept legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Committed to extending professional legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Specializing in defending persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440