...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Car Accident Attorney in Shipman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a car accident, you need sound legal advice and conscientious representation. You cannot settle for less when it comes to your rights and interests. Your choice should unequivocally be Carlson Bier, one of Illinois’s premier personal injury law firms specializing in car accidents. With a sterling track record amassed through years of tenacious advocacy, Carlson Bier stands as an astute preference for navigating these complex cases effectively. There is more to just understanding auto laws; there’s understanding people – an ethos deeply engrained at our firm where every case is treated with due diligence coupled with relentless determination to procure justice not merely reduced to a court-fought victory but also emotionally supportive experiences for clients dealing with post-accident trauma. Proudly serving residents throughout Illinois, including those from Shipman , we strive tirelessly in the pursuit of justice for victims suffering after life-altering automobile collisions. Building on intimate knowledge about intricacies linked specifically to regional laws only enhances our ability to better maneuver any systemic challenges geared towards securing rightful reparations while guarding your best interests fervently against insurance companies’ uncompromising demands putting you under undue pressure during this traumatic time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Shipman Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that being involved in a car accident can be devastating. We specialize in personal injury law and have been defending the rights of those involved in automobile accidents across Illinois for many years. Our expertise spans various types of vehicle collisions, encompassing single or multi-vehicle accidents, commercial vehicle crashes, motorcycle incidents, pedestrian impacts, among others.

A car accident can leave you with severe physical injuries, emotional trauma, mounting medical bills as well as loss of wages from time off work for recovery. It’s important to know you’re not alone during this challenging time – at Carlson Bier our prior case results speak volumes about our dedication and success rate in obtaining fair compensation for our clients’ losses.

• We utilize an extensive network of resources: these include medical experts who evaluate the extent of your injuries and financial consultants who assess long-term economic impact.

• We conduct a thorough investigation: Each car accident case is unique and therefore requires a diligent evaluation to identify any signs of negligence which paves the way towards just compensation.

• We employ strategic negotiation tactics: The insurance companies are experienced negotiators but rest assured; we have honed superior skills over the years to ensure favorable settlements for clients.

Mediating a personal injury claim stemming from a car accident is essentially about proving liability and calculating damages accurately; two aspects where our seasoned legal team excels tremendously. As one of the leading names in personal injury law within Illinois state lines – Carlson Bier prides itself on offering top-tier legal assistance characterized by personalized attention to every client.

Should your circumstance necessitate going beyond negotiations with insurers into trial proceedings; we’ve got it covered extensively! At Carlson Bier we’ll meticulously integrate all critical elements including witness testimonies, surveillance footage secured from traffic cameras if available, police reports etc., serving up an immaculate lawsuit package designed to increase likelihoods yielding maximum compensations significantly.

Remember this crucial fact about suffering as a result of automobile accidents in Illinois – you have the legal right to be compensated for your pain, anguish and expenses. Victims of car accidents often are entitled to claim damages including medical costs, emotional distress, lost wages and even possible punitive damages.

Thinking of taking action might seem daunting due to physical and psychological turmoil placed on your shoulders post-accident; anxiety generated by apprehension over legal procedures only adds onto the burden. This is where Carlson Bier steps in reassuringly; navigating you through complex lifespheres encompassing law & medicine with assuring adeptness, ensuring that justice prevails in your specific case through fair compensation acknowledgement.

To wrap up this comprehensive guide on vehicular accident engagements from a legal perspective, we would like to extend an invitation for us to assist you personally with your potential case. At Carlson Bier our mission revolves around diligent pursuit towards helping victims regain control over their lives following unfortunate incidents on Illinois roads. If you or a loved one has been involved in a car accident, click the button below. Find out how much your case could potentially yield upon evaluation by our expert team – remember each consultation at Carlson Bier is free-of-charge until successful conclusion securing rightful remunerations effectively!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Shipman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Shipman

Areas of Practice in Shipman

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing skilled legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Offering specialist legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying specialist legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Trip Injuries

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for harms and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Crash

Offering experienced legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Brain Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and adept legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Focused on advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​