...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in South Pekin

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Bicyclists in South Pekin understand that commuting on two wheels carries inherent risks. When accidents do occur, it’s crucial to have tough representation fighting for you. This is where Carlson Bier, distinguished Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, demonstrate their expertise. They are seasoned professionals versed in the complexities of Bicycle Accidents litigation and proficient in navigating these oftentimes complicated cases towards successful outcomes for their clients. Their commitment begins from pinpointing potentially liable parties and determining actionable negligence causing your bicycle accident pain or loss. Not limited by geographical borders within Illinois, they offer consultation to victims all around the state including South Pekin clients who require dedicated legal advocacy after Bicycle Accidents; handling negotiations with insurance companies or moving claims through courts if need be to secure deserved compensation – a reassuring testament to Carlson Bier’s unwavering commitment across miles.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in South Pekin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our commitment goes beyond providing exceptional legal representation to those who suffered personal injury due to negligence. As a personal injury attorney group based out in Illinois, we feel it is our duty to provide you comprehensive and discerning insight on different accidents and how they impact victims legally. Today, we gather some salient points on one of such incidents – Bicycle Accidents.

A common incident in the bustling streets of Illinois, bicycle accidents occur more often than most people anticipate—often leading to severe physical harm and emotional trauma for the victims involved. These occurrences are not merely unfortunate happenings; they’re challenges that demand strong voice, clear strategy, and intense determination—the very attributes that define us at Carlson Bier.

The legal landscape surrounding these bicycle accidents here in Illinois can be intricate but highly critical for every biking enthusiast to understand:

• Understanding Negligence: In a broader sense, if an accident occurred due to another party’s failure in their responsibility to act with reasonable care or caution—be it a driver or pedestrian—they may well be considered negligent.

• Legal Assistance Is Vital: Given the unique circumstances of each case, engaging an experienced personal injury lawyer specializing in bike accidents becomes particularly essential. The attorney assists victims prove their claim by investigating the scene and accumulating tangible evidences.

• Noneconomic Damages Compensation: It is important to know that compensation isn’t just about medical bills & loss wages recovery but also accounts emotional pain—fear, embarrassment stress—or even disruption of family relationships which all fall under noneconomic damages according past judgments made by courts located within Illinois jurisdiction.

By deciding upon filing lawsuit against defendants responsible for your injuries post bicycle accident—you have accepted a responsibility that requires perseverance too! But remember you aren’t alone in this fight as our specialists at Carlson Bier will stand with you until justice is served – guided by compassion & built upon vast legal experience across varied cases concerning personal injuries including bicycle accidents.

Of course, navigating the intricacies of legal institutions can seem daunting, especially for those burdened with a personal injury. Yet it is that very burden that makes this navigation crucial—fighting to turn unfortunate accidents into productive action securing rightful compensation isn’t an easy task hence why we strive to make the process as transparent and smooth as possible for our clients.

At Carlson Bier, every client is unique, as are their experiences and their cases. Regardless of your situation or bicycle accident’s intricate complexities you have endured – rest assured, serving Illinois citizens responsibly remains our foremost commitment! Therefore, in partnering together—we’re not just bringing years of legal experience but strengthening your chances at maximum compensation against any party found negligent leading to your unfortunate mishap.

We invite every reader who has recently suffered from a Bicycle Accident—or knows someone who did—to consider getting in touch with us at Carlson Bier today. By understanding your case in-depth, we strategically position ourselves towards ensuring justice isn’t just delayed—but served rightfully in favor of bicycle accident victims seeking fair recompense. Click on the button below and learn how much your case potentially could be worth; remember: justice too often gets delayed but should never remain denied! Allow us to help you navigate through these challenging times; let’s fight together because you matter—and so does justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For South Pekin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in South Pekin

Areas of Practice in South Pekin

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending skilled legal advice for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering experienced legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending adept legal representation for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Building Incidents

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Committed to ensuring specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​