Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Thompsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a vicious dog attack occurs in Thompsonville, the expertise of Carlson Bier is your strongest recourse. With an exemplary record in personal injury law, we fashion our service around the specific demands of dog bite cases. Our attorney group meticulously understands every intricate detail to present compelling litigation on your behalf. As specialists in Dog Bite Injuries, we skillfully navigate Illinois’ statute regarding such offenses and passionately advocate for victims seeking justice after traumatic encounters with aggressive canine companions. Every case enshrined to us receives personalized attention acknowledging its unique requirements ensuring maximum compensation for physical damages, emotional distress as well as medical expenses incurred due to these incidents. Trusting Carlson Bier translates into decisive action on loss recovery from all significantly responsible parties involved; pet owners or insurers alike cannot evade their responsibility under our meticulous eye for legal details through diligent representation by Carlson Bier: investing emotion coupled with professional determination towards restoring normalcy and comfort back into clients’ lives post such incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Thompsonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing victims of various personal injuries, including those resulting from Dog Bite Injuries. It is vital to understand the severity and intricacies of these incidents as they can bring about severe health consequences and economic implications.

Dog Bite Injuries are not just painful wounds suffered by victims; they also come with a phalanx of profound impacts on a person’s life. Following an attack by a dog, you could sustain significant physical injuries ranging from abrasions to puncture wounds and far-reaching damages such as nerve damage or even infections like rabies and tetanus. Beyond the physical trauma, many victims often endure psychological effects that may last much longer than their healing period: fear of dogs, anxiety disorders, sleep disturbances, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Also important to note:

– Illinois ranks among the states with the highest frequency of reported Dog Bite Injuries.

– The state holds owners strictly liable for any unease caused by their pets under what is known as strict liability law.

– The Illinois Animal Control Act stipulates that if a dog attacks without provocation and causes injury to an individual who is peacefully conducting himself/herself in an area where they may lawfully be present, then that individual has grounds for compensation.

Victims have the right to pursue legal action against responsible parties for all costs incurred due to this kind of injury. These can include medical expenses such as hospital bills, medication costs and physiotherapy charges but might also consist of lost wages during recovery time or even loss of future earning capacity if permanently disfigured or disabled. Additionally non-economic damages like pain suffering mental anguish decreased quality life which nearly impossible quantify put price are considered too.

However compelling your case may seem though navigating legal processes left alone especially when dealing certain conditions demand thorough understanding laws statutes can cumbersome task constitutes strong reason why our dedicated attorneys invaluable assets quest justice rightful compensation We offer decades collective experience successfully settling cases dog bite victims ensuring receive damages deserve without ever compromising safety privacy.

At Carlson Bier, we not only guide you through the intricacies of the law but also ensure that your rights are upheld and defended throughout this process. We work tirelessly to get past any hurdles thrown our way so that you can focus on recovering from the distress caused by your unfortunate experience comfortably.

In light of these details, it goes beyond saying that dealing with Dog Bite Injuries requires a personal injury attorney group possessing an in-depth understanding of Illinois state laws and ample experience handling such cases – qualities embodied by our expert team at Carlson Bier.

If you or a loved one has been affected by a Dog Bite Injury, let us help you navigate the distressing aftermath by utilizing our years of expertise to generate the most promising outcome for your case. Click on the button below to find out just how much value we believe your case is worth, because at Carlson Bier, we truly believe in delivering justice where it’s due and compensating victims rightly for their misfortune.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thompsonville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Thompsonville

Areas of Practice in Thompsonville

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending adept legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Slip Accidents

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain just settlement for injuries and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Incident

Extending specialist legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in delivering professional legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Expert in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer