...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Thompsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved one is facing a spinal cord injury, the aftermath can be daunting. Unforeseen medical expenses, loss of income, and long-term disability all add to an already stressful situation. During such times you need legal representation from experts in this field; that’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. Based in Illinois, our firm specializes in representing clients with spinal cord injuries and we recognize Thompsonville as a key area for our services.

As diligent advocates for victims of spinal cord injuries with decades of combined experience, everyone at Carlson Bier understands the importance and complexity these cases hold. We are known for meticulously reviewing every detail of your case to ensure full compensation is achieved on your behalf.

What sets us apart is not just our expertise in this particular branch but also our relentless dedication to justice obtaining the highest settlements possible for affected individuals.

We navigate through complex matters relating to insurance claims and legal statutes confidently so that you don’t have to bear more stress than necessary. High-quality personalized service remains paramount at Carlson Bier – helping guide those afflicted by spine-related incidents towards better tomorrows. Trust us today; let us make sure justice prevails tomorrow!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Thompsonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how overwhelming and devastating spinal cord injuries can be. As a reputable law firm in Illinois, our expertise lies in providing outstanding legal services for victims of personal injury, including cases involving substantial harm to the spinal cord. Our well-qualified team of attorneys is committed to advocating for your rights, helping you receive the maximum compensation possible while prioritizing your long-term wellbeing.

Firstly, it’s important to discern that spinal cord injuries can vary greatly in severity based on the specifics of an incident. Such injuries might result from multiple causes – vehicular accidents being top-most among them followed by slip-and-fall accidents and workplace incidents like falls from heights or mishandling heavy machinery. These tragic occurrences can lead to series of challenges ranging from temporary discomfort or mobility issues to permanent paralysis.

The consequences of severe spinal cord injuries usually extend beyond physical damage. The emotional toll cannot be underestimated as dealing with such injury often incurs significant stress and anxiety due to changes in lifestyle and potential loss of income. Furthermore, you might have also accrued lofty medical bills related both directly and indirectly to the treatment necessary for recovery.

Here are noteworthy points about insurance settlements:

• Most insurance companies attempt an early settlement approach where they offer less than what you deserve.

• Some individuals might be unaware that full recuperation costs more than immediate medical expenditures.

• Often, victims fail to account for future costs pertaining rehabilitation therapy.

At Carlson Bier, we intimately understand these pitfalls and work hard towards ensuring that our clients get fair settlements reflecting true extent of their hardships.

Before proceeding further with any claim relating to a spinal injury case, it’s crucial to ascertain liability accurately. This is a difficult process that requires deep comprehension of local laws and regulations along with proficiency in gathering appropriate evidence needed support your claim adequately; hence why professional legal assistance becomes invaluable.

In some instances, multiple parties may share liability — such as if faulty equipment at work led to your injury, both the employer and the manufacturer could potentially be held responsible. Our seasoned attorneys have the competence required to identify all negligent parties, further maximizing your compensation.

Handling a personal injury case involving spinal cord damage requires expertise in vast areas encompassing medical, legal as well as insurance matters. Here at Carlson Bier, we ensure that every stage of your claim is managed meticulously by collaborating with medical practitioners and consultants so as to present an irrefutable claim on your behalf.

Our team at Carlson Bier not just emphasizes securing fair settlements but also assists clients throughout their path in recovery. This can involve connecting you with relevant resources such as physical therapists or vocational rehabilitation specialists required for successful long-term healing.

Overall, undergoing a spinal cord injury turns out to be one of life’s most challenging episodes but remember – you don’t have to face it alone. With dedicated law firms like Carlson Bier by your side during this complicated journey ensures that you stand up against injustices done to you rightfully and courageously.

By now you’ve gained deeper insights into how crucial a role competent professional legal assistance plays when navigating through such pivotal times revolving around complex situations like spinal cord injuries.

We encourage you to take action accordingly; feel free to reach out if need arises or discuss any queries bothering you. And remember: determining a spinal injury case’s worth isn’t easy but our online tool simplifies it significantly – just click on the button below & get started towards reclaiming control over your life after this traumatic setback right away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thompsonville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Thompsonville

Areas of Practice in Thompsonville

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering expert legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents receive just compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Incident

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Specializing in defending victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​