...

Personal Injury Attorney in West Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Selecting a personal injury attorney demands careful consideration. Allow us to present Carlson Bier, an exceptional personal injury law firm with unwavering commitment to their clients. Dealing with aftermath of accidents can be incredibly stressful, and it is at this point that the lawyers from Carlson Bier step in to provide much-needed respite wrapped in legality and compassion. Operating within the guidelines of Illinois law ensures clients receive personalized attention whilst maintaining utmost integrity throughout proceedings. The firm’s diverse team boasts a depth of experience outmatched only by their determination to protect your rights and secure fair outcomes for you.Understanding that each client’s circumstances are unique, they strive towards customizing strategies that suit individual needs best.Through expert negotiation skills or impressive courtroom prowess if necessary ,they fight tirelessly until justice is served . From traffic incidents or slip-and-fall cases at neglected properties in West Garfield Park-alight on the superior legal services offered by Carlson Bier: your go-to resource whenever life presents an unforeseen stumbling block.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in West Garfield Park Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, Illinois’ premier personal injury law firm and your dedicated partner in navigating legal complexities. We are committed to helping you understand the intricacies of personal injury law and work closely with our clients, ensuring that they are informed every step of the way. Our seasoned team is well-versed in Illinois legislation, adopting an unrivaled combination of practice experience and local knowledge aimed at securing justice for injury victims.

Personal injuries can occur in numerous scenarios – from road accidents to workplace incidents and medical malpractices. Knowing what constitutes a valid personal injury claim is crucial for your case. Essentially, if you sustain harm due to another’s negligence or intentional conduct, then you have grounds for a personal injury case.

Regarding timing, it’s worth noting that Illinois statute imposes a two-year deadline on filing personal injury suits starting from the date of incident occurrence or discovery. Missing this timeline jeopardizes your chance at compensation claims which only emphasizes why swift action is key once an event has taken place.

In establishing liability, more than one party can be held accountable for the victim’s injuries under Illinois’ comparative fault system. The damages awarded will depend on each party’s proportionate responsibility.

Compensation following successful litigation covers all manner of things including:

• Medical expenses: This accounts for emergency visits, ongoing treatment plans, and any required rehabilitation costs.

• Lost wages: For the time spent out of work owing to recovery durations.

• Pain and suffering: A less tangible cost often relating emotional distress accompanied by physical trauma.

• Property damage: If applicable like cases concerning vehicular mishaps.

However complex moving forward might seem post unfortunate events; we assure guiding you through every stage successfully towards rightful compensation claims.

Carlson Bier upholds unwavering professionalism throughout its dealing without compromising compassionate customer care personally catered towards addressing client-specific needs within their comfort zone – home visits included when necessary.

We maintain full transparency with our fee structure too; operating on a contingency basis meaning that you don’t pay unless we win your case. This reflects our staunch belief in the merits of your claim coupled with our confident capability to deliver results.

Throughout our years of service, we’ve secured multiple significant verdicts and settlements whilst remaining resolutely focused on client priorities above all else. Our track record speaks volumes about our commitment towards achieving success – embedding us as not just another law firm for injury victims, but their undeterred voice seeking justice!

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing dedicated advocates committed to ensuring that compensation claims offer comprehensive coverages against physical, emotional, and financial burdens borne by clients post accidents. We believe that everyone dealing with individual hardships deserves complete restitution for sustained damages without being daunted by legal procedures.

We invite you onto a path where legal knowledge is dispersed freely, ensuring informed decisions when it matters most! Therefore if you or someone close has been affected by an unfortunate event triggering personal injuries then collate all possible information regarding the incident along with ostensible medical documentation before meeting us for strategizing effective litigation steps forward.

While experiences might be nerve-wracking yet remember every journey starts with a single step thus initiate your quest towards successful compensation right now. Do not let geographic boundaries deter contact – whether physically located at Illinois or away because when it comes to safeguarding rights distance never dissuades Carlson Bier from fighting relentlessly.

So why wait anymore? Don’t shy away from understanding what’s rightfully yours in rightful measures predestined by state laws and together let’s triumph over adversities transforming them into victories instead! To get started with your first consultation or explore how much your case could be worth click the button below right now – because at Carlson Bier every hurt counts!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For West Garfield Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in West Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in West Garfield Park

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering professional legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering professional legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Injuries

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Collision

Ensuring professional legal advice for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Building Incidents

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Committed to advocating for individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer