FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Winfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be traumatic and challenging. However, victims in Winfield are not alone; The Carlson Bier law firm is readily prepared to provide legal assistance for such incidents. Our team takes pride in defending the rights of individuals who have unwelcome encounters with canine companions resulting in physical harm. We understand these situations intricately and hold comprehensive knowledge about Illinois’s personal injury laws, making us an optimal consideration for handling your case. As professionals at Carlson Bier, we focus on obtaining rightful compensation covering medical expenses, trauma implications, loss of earnings among others arising from the dog bite injuries sustained by our clients. Extracting justice isn’t a daunting task when you’re supported by empathetic attorneys having formidable track records proving their expertise time and again. We ensure each client gets personalized attention equalled with undeterred dedication while navigating through this legal journey together—simply illustrating why turning to Carlson Bier translates into turning towards a brighter future amid trying times performing perfectly on all related fronts of Dog Bite Injuries attorney services.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Winfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical trauma and emotional distress that comes with being a victim of dog bite injuries. We offer dedicated legal services to help our clients obtain rightful compensation for their pain, suffering, as well as any incurred financial losses. Serving throughout Illinois, our experienced attorneys are armed with an in-depth knowledge of personal injury law and can best utilize complex state statutes to your advantage.

Dog bites can result in severe and sometimes even lifelong consequences. The wounds may lead to permanent disfigurement or impairment, not to mention potential psychological damage such as fear or anxiety issues. Furthermore, medical costs associated with the treatment of dog bite injuries can be substantial. This could include emergency care expenses, ongoing treatments like physiotherapy or surgeries, medication cost plus other related expenses like loss of earnings due to time off work.

Effects from dog bites are not solely limited to physical harm. Emotional scars might occur leading to conditions such as PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), depression, recurring nightmares violation of California’s leash laws among others. It’s also worth noting that in some situations where infection ensues after a bite incident; hefty bills for specialized treatment would be inevitable which again highlights the need for adequate compensation.

Illinois law is on the side of victims when it comes to dog bites under section 16 of Chapter 510 (ILCS). The owner is strictly liable if their animal causes injury without provocation providing condition(s) allowing them reasonable way or method to prevent such incident from happening were absent according to this statute.

In order for us at Carlson Bier able help you navigate through complexities surrounding cases involving dogs attack:

– Assessment will first be made based upon unique circumstances involved

– Applying knowledge pertaining rules set forth by court systems & local ordinance/legislation…

– Creating strategies aimed combating defense tactics commonly used insurance companies…

– Facilitating effective negotiations claim settlement purposes

Successful representation isn’t merely about presenting facts in court, it’s about building a comprehensible story for the jury and judge. Ensuring they understand the gravity of your physical emotional suffering, monetary damage sustained due to medical bills or lost wages alongside potential future costs linked to rehabilitation or additional necessary services.

Without doubt, moving forward from a dog bite incident requires much more than just medical interventions. It demands comprehensive practical and emotional support from professionals who truly care about their clients’ well-being. Allow us at Carlson Bier to help streamline the legal process while you focus on regaining health stability hence providing some semblance of normalcy after such traumatic event transpired.

In addition to showcasing our dedication towards justice attainment – which is inherently reflected through vast experience specialty realm personal injury law boasts; it’s indeed this sense compassion drives that internal motivation required when facing these trying times beside you every step way until ultimate victory achieved together!

Want an experienced attorney who will tirelessly fight for your rights? You’re just one click away from finding out how much potential value lies within your case! Simply click on the button below to navigate towards a potentially brighter financial future post this harrowing ordeal – allow us at Carlson Bier aid in bearing burden so journey toward healing can begin today. Remember, no effort is too little when seeking recovery from a personal injury impairment thus empower yourself now by taking simple yet crucial first step: Reach out.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Winfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Winfield

Areas of Practice in Winfield

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing adept legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Stumble Injuries

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents receive reasonable payout for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Offering adept legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in ensuring expert legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​