...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Trucking Accident Attorney in Ashburn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In dealing with trucking accidents, Carlson Bier provides unrivaled legal representation. Committed to serving Ashburn community, our team of expert attorneys fiercely advocate for victims who have suffered due to truck mishaps. We understand the severity and complexity of such incidents and provide tailored legal strategies suited to every client’s unique circumstances. As a top-tier law firm in Illinois, we bring extensive familiarity with state laws governing these accidents, offering an upper hand in contestations. Our success story consists of numerous cases where we’ve secured maximum compensation for suffering clients; aiding their financial recovery alongside physical and emotional healing. At Carlson Bier, comprehensive service extends from gathering evidential support to presenting assertive claim arguments,right down till achieving fair settlements or verdicts.Our unrelenting dedication together with limitless expertise underscores why many consider us when seeking reliable representation following a devastating trucking accident.Consider no further than Carlson Bier for result-oriented litigation that stands on your side till justice is served.Edit

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Trucking Accident Lawyers in Ashburn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to delivering superior legal representation for victims of trucking accidents in Illinois. We understand that colliding with a large commercial vehicle can leave you physically injured, mentally distraught and clueless about your rights. That’s where we step in as your dependable personal injury attorneys.

To begin with, understanding why truck accidents happen is crucial to develop a strong case. Often these incidents result from drivers’ negligence including distracted driving, substance impairment, speeding or lack of proper rest due to unrealistic delivery deadlines. Furthermore, vehicle-related issues such as improper maintenance or design flaw bring added layers to accident cases.

In the aftermath of a trucking accident, securing evidence is essential. This may encompass accident scene photos, video footage from nearby cameras and statements from eyewitnesses. Victims should also document their own injuries and property damage thoroughly with medical records and repair estimates underpinning a compelling legal argument.

The complex nature of trucking accidents requires a detailed study of applicable laws. For instance, per federal regulations established by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), all interstate trucks must have liability insurance coverage which theoretically works to compensate the injured party’s damages in an accident scenario.

Here are some key points one should remember after experiencing a trucking accident:

• Seeking immediate medical attention – despite how mild your injuries feel – should be the top priority.

• Document everything pertinent at the incident scene; photographs or videos can serve as formidable pieces of evidence.

• Avoid discussing your accident on social media; this information could potentially be utilised against you during claim settlement negotiations.

• Initiate contact with legal counsel as soon as you are physically able following an emergency treatment procedure.

Navigating intricate insurance claims without an experienced attorney by your side often leaves victims short-changed by hefty deduction tactics employed by insurance companies to minimise their payout responsibilities.’Who pays?’ is usually not straightforward when multiple parties like truck-operating companies and logistics corporations potentially share liability in an incident. Hence, outmaneuvering these tactics requires expertise only seasoned personal injury attorneys possess.

Moreover, determining fair compensation value takes into account not just immediate medical costs and lost wages but also factors like pain and suffering, ongoing medical needs and diminished future earning capacity. Our dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier illuminate the understanding about such complex aspects to our clients, constructing a robust claim that secures maximum rightful compensation.

What sets us apart is our exceptional welfare-oriented approach towards our clients. We understand the emotional turmoil victims undergo post a catastrophic incident and take extra care to ensure they feel comfortable during this ordeal. Enlisting outstanding legal representation like ours saves you from expending energy on cumbersome legal work and allows you to recuperate in peace while we zealously fight for your rights.

Our success stories include fetching remarkable settlements for countless truck accident victims who trusted our experience coupled with relentless pursuit of justice. Remember even if your incident involved a truck from another state, or cases where the responsible truck driver or company disputes their fault – we have handled such diverse scenarios effectively thanks to our comprehensive understanding of federal laws applying to interstate trucking companies.

If you’ve been injured in a tragic instance involving a commercial trucking accident don’t hesitate in securing your rights by hiring experienced attorneys like us at Carlson Bier. Connect today to benefit from specialized advice specific to your case thereby reinforcing chances of acquiring justified compensation rightfully belonging to you. If you’re ready now click on the button below – it will allow us to determine how much your unique case is worth without any commitment! Trust Carlson Bier with your case; after all, we put people before procedure.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Ashburn Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Trucking Accident FAQ​

Trucking accidents are often caused by a combination of factors, including driver fatigue, mechanical failures, improper loading of cargo, speeding, and inadequate driver training. External factors like poor road conditions and bad weather can also contribute.

Safety first: move to a safe area if possible. Call emergency services for medical and police assistance. Document the scene with photos and notes, and gather contact information from witnesses and all involved parties. It’s also crucial to seek medical attention, even if you feel fine, as some injuries may not be immediately apparent.

Liability in trucking accidents can be complex. It may involve the truck driver, the trucking company, manufacturers of truck parts, or other third parties. An investigation will typically look into the driver’s actions, vehicle maintenance records, the trucking company’s compliance with regulations, and other factors to determine fault.

Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, punitive damages might be awarded, especially if gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved.

Trucking accidents often involve complex legal and regulatory issues. An attorney with experience in this field can navigate federal and state trucking laws, deal with large trucking companies and their insurers, and help ensure that you receive fair compensation. They can also assist in gathering evidence and expert testimonies necessary for building a strong case.

All Attorney Services in Ashburn

Areas of Practice in Ashburn

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending expert legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Extending professional legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Incident

Extending adept legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in delivering professional legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Specializing in supporting victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​