...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Avon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have experienced substandard medical care in Avon, which resulted in injury or worsening of your health, Carlson Bier’s highly skilled Medical Malpractice attorneys are here to defend your rights. Our expertise lies in successfully investigating and litigating complex malpractice cases that involve medication errors, misdiagnosis, surgical mishaps among others. As an Illinois-based personal injury law firm with a sterling track record, we deliver personalized legal strategies designed for positive outcomes. With added adherence to strict ethical norms above all else at our core value system – trust us to prioritize client interests before anything else. What makes Carlson Bier stand apart is our meticulous attention-to-detail while building the cases and rigorous representation enabling clients get the rightful compensation they deserve! We empathetically understand the turmoil faced by victims of medical negligence; hence offer relentless support through these tumultuous times. Choose Carlson Bier lawyers – presume brilliance in every move professionals who advocate fairness with compassion because we believe justice shouldn’t be a privilege but a right for everyone!

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Avon Illinois

Dedicated and professional, Carlson Bier stands out as a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. Our primary aim is the effective representation of clients who’ve experienced harm due to potential negligence within the medical community. A key area of our expertise lies in medical malpractice; an unfortunate circumstance that can lead to dire consequences for innocent individuals seeking health care.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider diverges from the recognized “standard of care” pertaining to treating patients. The ‘standard of care’ translates to what reasonably careful medical providers would do under similar circumstances within their field. Errors arising from diagnosis, treatment delivery, or even advice during aftercare stages can warrant a genuine case of Medical Malpractice.

Let’s delve into deep nuances:

– Critical timelines: Illinois law typically allows two years from the discovery date, but never more than four years from alleged wrongdoing regardless if the damage was discovered later on.

– Proving negligence: It must be established that injury resulted directly from violation of the standard duty of care rather than from inherent risks associated with treatment or illness.

– Damage evaluation: Not limited only to physical harm and economic losses; pain, suffering, distress often included in ascertainment.

The legal landscape around medical malpractice is vast and intricate – understanding these complexities demands focused specialization which Carlson Bier brings to the scene through comprehensive consultation services and tenacious courtroom advocacy where necessary. We’re devoted to ensuring responsiveness, thorough investigation, meticulous preparation combined with strategic negotiations for every case we handle.

We constantly update our approach basing on pivotal industry developments hence allowing us not only respond effectively against negligent healthcare entities but also helps educate clients about their rights thus empowering them through knowledge enhancement promoting informed decision making.

Why are we your trusted Personal Injury attorneys?

• Expert Knowledge: Our profound grasp over nuanced legal components of medical malpractice sets us apart.

• Driven by dedication: Your fight becomes ours as we tirelessly work towards obtaining the best possible resolution.

• Comprehensive Services: From initial evaluation to representation in court, rest assured as we will be beside you at every step of your legal journey.

All this, while strictly adhering all state guidelines including compliance with Illinois location specifications. Our committed team operates from our physical office based explicitly within Illinois boundaries.

Invariably when one is affected by potential medical malpractice, numerous questions brim over – Is my case valid? What are my rights? How do I hold those responsible accountable? Allow us to provide our trusted legal counsel and simplify these confusing velifications for you.

Moreover, have you ever wondered how much your case may actually be worth? It could be significantly more than conceivable! Click the button below for a comprehensive evaluation – We are here ready help you navigate this complicated junction during an already challenging time– now only a click away. Legal nuances require expert navigation – let Carlson Bier guide you through.

Remember everyone deserves fair treatment; when the healthcare community fails in fulfilling their duty of care toward patients- remember Carlson Bier stands firm by righteous plight against wrongdoers.Contractually bound by ensuring justice served through fair compensation against any causation under medical malpractice context – get in touch today to check how much your case might be worth with Carlson Bier, a reputed personal injury attorney group at hand.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Avon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Avon

Areas of Practice in Avon

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering adept legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Tumble Occurrences

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents secure fair settlement for hurts and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Crash

Delivering professional legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on ensuring professional legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer