FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bartelso

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one experiences the unfortunate occurrence of a dog bite injury, your first call should be to Carlson Bier. We are stringent advocates for victims of dog attacks in Bartelso and throughout Illinois. As seasoned Dog Bite Injuries attorneys, we understand the physical and emotional repercussions that can follow such an event. We specialize in pursuing justice relentlessly on behalf of our clients while also offering compassionate support through this difficult journey. Our expert team navigates complex premises liability laws and negotiates with insurance companies assertively securing necessary compensation for medical costs, psychological trauma, lost wages and more. When choosing Carlson Bier for your representation needs, rest assured your case will be prioritized at every level; from collecting detailed evidence to deploying effective legal strategies – we leave no stone unturned! The experience garnered over years makes us invaluable warriors committed towards achieving total client satisfaction along with maximized verdicts and settlements.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bartelso Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re specialists in the field of personal injury law, with a particular emphasis on dog bite injuries. As an experienced legal team based out of Illinois, we understand that when a person falls victim to such an incident, it can be both physically and emotionally traumatic. It’s our duty to ensure you get the justice you rightfully deserve by representing your case effectively and zealously.

There are many aspects of dog bite injuries that one must take into account before proceeding with a claim. Not only do these incidents cause physical pain and suffering; they often lead to distress and constitute subsequent emotional trauma as well. Following are some crucial facts about dog bite cases:

• In most jurisdictions in Illinois, the dog owner holds strict liability for any injuries their pets inflict on other people.

• Emotional distress is considered an injury under Illinois law which may make victims eligible for compensation.

• Evidence is key in every personal injury case. Documentation like photographs of the injuries, medical reports stating the nature and extent of damages suffered along with eyewitness accounts could help strengthen your case.

• Under certain circumstances, if the owner knew their pet was dangerous yet didn’t take necessary precautions to protect others from his/her animal – known as ‘scienter’ provision – he or she might be held responsible for double or treble damages.

Our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier regard each client’s unique situation with utmost importance and care while providing customized legal solutions according to individual needs. We conduct thorough investigations into our clients’ claims so not even minor details are overlooked when crafting strong arguments.

Filing effective lawsuits involves tangible proof gathered through proper investigative techniques combined with comprehensive knowledge regarding state laws which requires skilled professionals like us who have experience handling similar situations ensuring maximum possible outcomes.

Dog bites can lead to significant health consequences including serious infection risks from bacteria present in animals’ mouths contributing towards longer recovery periods potentially surging medical expenditure adding financial strain onto physical trauma faced by victims making it even crucial to seek considerable compensation covering not only immediate but also upcoming expenses related with such incidents.

At Carlson Bier, we focus on educating our clients about the complexities of their case and their legal rights in order for them to be active participants during the proceedings. We’re always ready to lend an empathetic ear and offer candid advice so that you can make informed decisions every step of the way.

Do note that there are law-imposed time limits for filing personal injury claims called statute of limitations – usually around two years from when incident occurred under Illinois state laws; therefore, acting promptly upon suffering a dog bite injury might be essential in getting appropriate recompense.

And remember—our team doesn’t get paid until YOU do! We operate purely on contingency fee basis which means all our fees come out from settlement or verdict proceeds – we’re committed first towards securing your deserved justice before anything else.

Now that you understand how impactful a dog bite can be and how crucial correct representation is for your case—not just emotionally but financially as well—it’s time for action. Consider what having experienced attorneys like us by your side could mean for your claim’s success rate. Your physical pain, emotional trauma, lost wages due to recovery periods or permanent disability endured as result should never go uncompensated.

Don’t let another moment slip by without seeking rightful justice stemming from injuries inflicted by someone else’s irresponsibility especially since you’ve already suffered enough. Click on the button below to find out exactly how much your case worth may be—it’s absolutely free with zero obligations because at Carlson Bier, your wellbeing remains our top priority above everything else.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bartelso Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bartelso

Areas of Practice in Bartelso

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing adept legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Carelessness

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Fall Accidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents get just remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Offering professional legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Injuries

Expert in delivering compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to representing clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​