FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bismarck

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been unfortunate enough to suffer a dog bite injury in Bismarck, exploring the legal services of Carlson Bier should be the first step. This distinguished Illinois-based firm specializes in personal injury law, with an impressive track record on dog bite cases. The attorneys at Carlson Bier are proficient in navigating through complex legalities, ensuring your rights are preserved while efficiently fighting for fair compensation on your behalf. Coverage can include medical expenses, emotional distress and loss of earnings following such incidents. Their team understands that these injuries aren’t only physically damaging; victims also endure significant mental trauma which is factored into their claim assessment methods. With exceptional credentials and vast expertise, they approach each case uniquely to maximize recovery outcomes for victims injured by dogs around Bismarck area without actually suggesting physical presence there—consider it an expert hand reaching out across states lines for your benefit! Choose Carlson Bier as your guide through this stressful time: trust them—they know how to handle bites.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bismarck Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves as leading personal injury attorneys dedicated to championing your rights when it comes to dog bite injuries in Illinois. We understand the distress and trauma such incidences can yield and our main goal lies in ensuring you grasp a comprehensive understanding of this category of personal injury law while driving towards securing deserved compensation.

Dog bites are no minor incidents; they can result in severe physical injuries, psychological trauma, and financial strain due to medical bills. The physical harm inflicted might range from trivial punctures to serious muscle or nerve damage. Psychological consequences might also evolve from these alarming experiences leading victims into conditions such as anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This combined with towering medical bills makes the situation even more devastating.

This is why it is essential for victims of dog bites to reach out for legal help immediately after an incident occurs. Engaging a well-grounded attorney like those found at Carlson Bier allows swift action towards holding the animal owner accountable if negligence can be established.

• Illinois follows a ‘strict liability’ rule concerning dog bite cases implying that an owner assumes absolute responsibility over any harm their pet causes irrespective of whether the animal had formerly shown signs of aggression or not.

• Under Illinois law, noneconomic damages including pain, suffering, emotional trauma and decreased quality of life resulting from a dog bite may also be recovered.

• Furthermore, under certain circumstances where gross negligence is determined on the part of the pet owner; punitive damages may be claimed too.

Dealing with insurance companies forms another challenging aspect that most often leaves unrepresented victims receiving lower settlements than they ought to get. At Carlson Bier we fight aggressively against these low-ball insurance offers by negotiating effectively until a fair agreement is reached.

However not all dog bite scenarios lead directly into lawsuits. Some scenarios are resolvable through arbitration which involves negotiations between parties involved striving towards suitable agreements avoiding long courtroom processes. To certify whether your case best suits arbitration or legal action, it is imperative to consult our law firm. We provide free case evaluations for all prospective clients.

Educating yourself on laws governing dog bites in Illinois doesn’t imply staying abreast with the theoretical aspect alone; they should also empower you to exercise your rights where necessary. Make sure that after a dog bite incident:

• Seek medical attention prominently to ensure documentation of injuries

• Report the case to local authorities such as police departments,

• Secure witness testimonies if available including taking photographic evidence of your injury and the scene of the attack.

• Consult an attorney as soon as possible.

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to ensuring each individual facing this distressing event feels supported throughout their claim process. Our dedication lies in equipping our clients not just with the knowledge but also arming them towards exercising their rights appropriately when impacted by a dog bite incident.

Our lawyers handle every aspect of your case immersively while updating you routinely about how proceedings are faring along thus relieving you from any additional stress. Legal jargon can be puzzling, at Carlson Bier we ensure information passed across entails clear understanding revolving around your claim.

Every client deserves quality representation and at Carlson Bier we persevere relentlessly until justice is served maximally catering for past, present, and future ramifications brought forth by these unfortunate incidences. Let us shoulder the legal burden so you can focus primarily on recovery.

Naturally, potential clients wonder what amount their case might garner during consultation stages some even having certain figures in mind due to comparative analysis on similar cases derived from public forums or personal experiences shared by various individuals.

However, it’s crucial to remember that no two incidents are completely alike; what amounts were awarded heavily relies on several factors thus implying compensation amounts vary greatly between different scenarios. Furthermore, experienced attorneys value informing clients about realistic expectations rather than inflating possibilities destined for disappointment when final settlements are reached.

We urge you to allow Carlson Bier the privilege of taking this journey with you; our time-tested skills and relentless dedication have seen us secure noteworthy settlements for countless beneficiaries over decades of operation. We invite you to click on the button below in order to receive a free case evaluation which could potentially provide some initial guidance regarding the worth of your claim. With Carlson Bier, rest assured that we will leave no stone unturned until justice is served.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bismarck Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bismarck

Areas of Practice in Bismarck

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Offering professional legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring experienced legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Building Incidents

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to extending expert legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​