...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Brighton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we are esteemed experts in handling Dog Bite Injuries and personal injury claims. Navigating the complex legal landscape of Brighton might seem a daunting task—which is why you need the advanced expertise that only Carlson Bier’s seasoned attorneys can provide. Our team will champion for your rights meticulously while offering compassionate understanding of each individual case’s circumstances, proving how committed we are to serving those who have been unjustly harmed by dog bite injuries. Defending innocent victims’ interests against accountability evasions has marked many successes in our longstanding career—reflecting our competency and dedication in upholding justice for the wronged party. Although various factors can influence outcome scenarios, rest assured that with us at the helm, you’re encompassed with an unyielding shield effectively countering any deterrent formulating from complicated legalese or manipulative accusations designed to delegitimize legitimate claims. Select Carlson Bier as your ally in face of these harsh adversities—a personal injury law firm built on professionalism, reliability & ruthless pursuit for justice!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Brighton Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier, Illinois’ trusted personal injury attorney group. Our expert legal team specializes in an array of personal injury cases, notably handling a vast number of incidents involving dog bite injuries. Understanding the intricacies surrounding these unfortunate encounters is vital, as such injuries can lead to numerous physical and emotional complications which require considerable restorative care.

Dog bites are more than just superficial wounds; they pose significant risks that should not be ignored. They could potentially cause infections like Rabies, Tetanus or Capnocytophaga bacteria, often leading to further medical complications if left untreated. Additionally, victims may face psychological trauma following distressing close encounters with dogs which sometimes necessitate therapeutic intervention.

In Illinois, we want you to know your rights when it comes to dealing with dog bite injuries. The statute of limitations on most personal injury claims – including dog bites – is usually two years from the date of the incident. Also essential for everyone’s understanding is the ‘One Bite Rule’. This rule implies liability in instances where a dog owner knew, or should have known about their pet’s aggressive tendencies prior to an attack occurring. The State of Illinois however doesn’t follow this rule explicitly; here it operates under strict liability laws meaning if a person is injured by a dog without provoking and during peaceful conduct then regardless of its history the owner may be held responsible.

We help victims piece together pertinent evidence detailing circumstances around their particular situations – specifically whether owners had any inclination towards their pets’ aggressive behavior before attacks took place. Helping construct strong cases has allowed countless clients achieve favorable rulings over the years.

Law enforcement reports play supreme roles- as authorities called at attack scenes remain unbiased third-party witnesses who document exact situations as closely seen and heard first-hand during duty calls.

Medical records also prove instrumental in distinguishing degree sizes concerning animal-bite induced traumas – this helps jurors understand clearer ideas about painful encounters sustained due directly resulting canine aggression instances.

Eyewitness testimonies offer realistic and personal perspectives that bear into account exact moments when incidents occur – hence backing up claims with credible evidence.

Photographs of wounds likewise depict visual depictions regarding damages sustained – serving valuable complements helping to paint clearer pictures surrounding extent levels serious injuries penetrate physically among victims.

At Carlson Bier, we are your allies as you navigate uncharted territory. Our goal goes beyond managing paperwork involved in court proceedings on your behalf; rather, we aim for comprehensive support systems ensuring smooth transitions during painful recovery periods faced by clients caught within throes of suffering unexpected dog-bite engendered impediments challenging their everyday living conditions.

Our seasoned attorneys work persistently to deliver due justice for clients grappling with the aftermaths of such traumatic experiences. By bringing us onboard, you’re engaging a dedicated partner who’s committed towards securing maximum compensation covering incurred medical costs along with potential future therapies required assisting return to normal vibrant health routine schedules once enjoyed prior unfortunate occurrences inflicting persistent painful reminders challenging daily functions unduly compromised by other people’s negligent actions causing hurtful dog-related incidents.

In a world where seeking legal intervention often seems daunting, Carlson Bier pares down complexities typically involved during unfamiliar legal terrain navigational processes. Our detailed attention on every personal injury claim brought before us ensures fulfilling client encounters while managing their individual case expectations efficiently aligned to statutory guidelines governing all procedure rules applying dog bite incidents happening across Illinois territories.

For anyone finding themselves undergoing dealing stress loads piled upon after enduring unfortunate canine assault instances- remember this: The law is here for you. And just within dial reach away stands your devoted courtroom bureau ready extending knowledgeable assistance trained experts in handling precisely these kinds defense cases- Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorney Group.

Discover how much your case could be worth today! You’ve taken the first step toward understanding more about defending your rights and possible compensations possibly awaiting rightfully deserved payouts forthwith connected uniquely personal claims relevant directly linked to dog-bite-incident experiences. Let us continue the journey with you. Click on the button below to evaluate potential legal remedies you may be entitled in pursuing rewarding outcomes upholding court justice delivery rituals championing rightful claimant satisfaction among all effected parties involved within their individually matters concerning particular significant life-affecting incidences.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Brighton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Brighton

Areas of Practice in Brighton

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving expert legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending professional legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering expert legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer