...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chemung

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatic and alarming. It’s essential to consider reliable legal assistance for such incidents, where Carlson Bier is a trusted choice. Specializing in personal injury law with an emphasis on dog bite injuries, we provide comprehensive legal services designed to ensure justice under Illinois laws. Our group of attorneys exhibits unparalleled professionalism and dedication while working meticulously on each case – guided by the compelling aim to secure maximum compensation for clients enduring the physical and emotional aftereffects of a dog attack. Bring your case into our hands; let us analyze every aspect of it meticulously, enabling you to navigate this distressing experience with clarity and confidence. Whether you’re dealing with medical bills or emotional turmoil post-injury in Chemung, allow the exceptional team at Carlson Bier – dedicated advocates versed in relevant legislation – address your concerns promptly while upholding your rights vigorously. Your fight towards justice needs someone who understands its intricacies – that’s what you will find at Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chemung Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the deep distress and life-altering trauma that dog bite injuries can induce. As a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our well-versed attorneys are ready to offer professional legal support for victims of such unwelcomed events. Dog bites can lead to severe physical injuries, emotional trauma, and financial strain due to medical bills. Our skilled team of lawyers specializes in navigating through these complexities to champion for your rights and ensure you get the compensation you deserve.

One pivotal aspect to be aware of regarding dog bite incidents is Illinois’ strict liability laws concerning pet owners. The law states that a pet owner has full responsibility for their pet’s actions irrespective of whether the animal previously showed any violent inclinations or not. Often, the only essential factor in gaining remuneration is proof that the dog injured you without provocation while you were conducting yourself peaceably.

• Proof of Injury: Documenting an accurate account of your injuries is crucial when filing a claim. Medical records detailing your immediate treatment as well as follow-up visits can help fortify your case.

• Police & Animal Control Reports: Contacting local authorities following an attack can provide impartial documentation backing your claim.

• Witness Testimonies: If there were others present during an incident, collecting their statements could strengthen your case.

Illinois law entitles dog bite victims to receive compensation from liable parties for damages resulting from an unprovoked attack. These damages may include past and future medical expenses; pain and suffering; scarring or disfigurement; lost wages; loss of normal life – essentially sums intended to put the injured person back into the same position they would have been if not bitten.

However, do bear in mind that every case presents unique circumstances which might influence potential compensation amounts generally received by comparable cases – hence it being crucially advisable for victims of dog bites to retain experienced legal counsel like our adept team at Carlson Bier.

Remember, you only have a limited time frame to initiate legal processes post an incident – in Illinois, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is typically two years from the date of injury. It’s crucial, therefore, to not delay seeking out comprehensive legal advice and representation.

Victims often struggle under burdens brought on by dog bite injuries – physical pain, emotional distress and financial strain. However, every victim deserves fair compensation and that is what we strive for at Carlson Bier. We’re dedicated advocates for dog bite victims with solid experience negotiating and litigating these types of cases in Illinois.

The journey towards achieving adequate recompensation can be filled with numerous obstacles. However, it’s important to know that with committed legal support like ours at Carlson Bier behind you every step of the way, successfully navigating through this intricate process becomes significantly less daunting.

Are you ready to take the next step? You may be wondering just how much your case could be worth. Allow our dedicated personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier conduct a thorough evaluation of your claim. Click on the button below now to receive a complimentary estimation of your case value – let us accompany you on this vital journey towards lawful recompense.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Chemung Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chemung

Areas of Practice in Chemung

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing expert legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending professional legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring professional legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Specializing in extending expert legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Focused on supporting individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer