...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dallas City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Should you, unfortunately, fall victim to a dog bite injury in Dallas City, the professional legal support of Carlson Bier can provide might be your best solution. Our proficient team specializes in personal injury cases, particularly those concerning dog bite injuries. It’s crucial for you to know that such incidents are not taken lightly by our experienced attorneys who diligently work on securing the benefits and compensation rightfully due to afflicted parties.

As an esteemed firm based out of Illinois, we are well-versed with all intricate nuances surrounding these unfortunate cases across multiple jurisdictions. Although every case is distinctively different requiring personalized attention and strategies uniquely designed for maximum results; our dedication remains constant – obtaining justice for victims.

With Carlson Bier at helm navigating through legal complexities involved in securing rightful damage reimbursement becomes easier than facing it yourself without expert assistance. By employing strategic methodologies flanked by years of experience dealing with insurers,painstakingly accumulating evidence or mapping out sustained damages meticulously – our client-centric approach ensures unparalleled commitment towards achieving positive outcomes.Always remember: When grappling with trauma from a dog-bite episode – You needn’t stand alone. Choose trusted counsel.Choose wisely.Choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dallas City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to ensuring your rights are fully upheld under Illinois state law. We specialize in personal injury cases – notably those resulting from dog bite injuries. Every day, individuals unfortunately become victims of dog attacks that often result in substantial physical harm and emotional trauma. Our primary duty as personal injury lawyers is to protect your interests and secure just compensation for you or any loved ones who have been involved in a dog bite incident.

Dog bites may seem like relatively commonplace incidents, but they can lead to severe long-term consequences. They’re responsible for not only physical injuries but also contribute towards psychological trauma that could possibly persist for a longer period after the event has happened.

Contrary to popular belief, liability doesn’t only affect dog owners; landlords and property managers are sometimes held accountable under certain circumstances. This complicates cases further, making it essential to have knowledgeable professionals on your side who prioritize your well-being above all else.

A few key points define our practice at the Carlson Bier Law Firm:

• Expertise: With years of experience dealing with dog bite cases in Illinois specifically, we are adept at understanding its nuanced landscape – something necessary to navigate the complexities attached to these case types.

• Transparency: Throughout the legal proceedings, we maintain utmost transparency about potential outcomes so clients make informed decisions about their cases.

• Supportive Environment: Understanding the stress you may be experiencing post-incident motivates us to create a reassuring environment meant solely for your ease.

• Comprehensive Approach: We provide an all-encompassing strategy focused on achieving compensatory justice for medical expenses, lost wages and further damages associated with such accidents including pain and suffering caused by physical ailments or emotional distress.

While laws vary state-to-state when it comes to holding people responsible for injuries caused by pets belonging to them or inhabiting their properties, Illinois governs via strict ‘Animal Control Act’. Simply put – if you have suffered from an unprovoked dog bite in Illinois, the ‘Animal Control Act’ firmly holds the owner culpable for every harm you’ve had to encounter.

This overshadows contributory negligence arguments often advocated by antagonists – deflecting blame onto victims on grounds of provocation or invasion of property. If you’ve landed into such a scenario, wield your rights today; remember, our justice system thrives on victim protection rather than penalizing innocent citizens.

Though we are located within beautiful limits of Illinois and exert our expertise to handle statewide cases only due to strict legal restrictions, geographical boundaries don’t limit us from offering industry-leading services in safeguarding personal injuries resulting from dog bite actions.

At Carlson Bier, we aim to go above and beyond when representing your needs during these trying times. Each case is unique; however, you can rest assured that as part of our community, you will receive dedicated assistance tailored specifically for your situation.

Remember -post incident trauma may persist unknowingly while holdbacks like skepticism about your rights or fear of damaging relations with liable parties may deter you from pursuing justified compensation. Reach out even if there’s slight confusion taking toll on your peace; let us steer it back towards tranquility.

Seek valuable insights after any unfortunate involvement in a dog-bite action via a quick click below for an approximation on how much is rightfully yours under careful analysis pertaining exclusively to associated laws in Illinois State. It’s an indispensable tool aligned with our commitment towards providing defined paths leading towards desired recovery.

We promise unwavering support throughout this journey no matter what challenges endure ahead. Every preventative step today counts sagaciously against further hurdles tomorrow might bring forth—So why wait? Gain control over your future now! Click below to find out how much your case could be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dallas City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dallas City

Areas of Practice in Dallas City

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing skilled legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal aid for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents get reasonable compensation for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Collision

Ensuring experienced legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Building Incidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on extending dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to defending victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​