FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Deerfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unexpected transpires and you become a victim of a dog bite injury in Deerfield, Carlson Bier is indisputably your ideal option for legal representation. With our team’s combined depth of knowledge and extensive experience in personal injury law, we have proven effectiveness when litigating dog bite cases. Over time, we’ve garnered recognition not just by adeptly serving victims but conclusively fighting these cases to victory—securing favorable settlements often beyond our clients’ expectations. We fully comprehend the gravity that such injuries can add to an individual’s life; hence at Carlson Bier, empathy aligns with expertise. Our proactive approach involves rigorous investigation protocols promptly initiated after every accusation comes through—leading unequaled evidence collection for solid argumentation later on during court sessions or negotiation tables alike. Whether you need advice related to insurance claims or require aggressive courtroom advocates working relentlessly for your rightful compensation—trust none other than Carlson Bier! Given our consistent track record salvaging hope from seeming despairing scenarios – rendering us trusted names within Illinois’s dynamic legal sphere – considering us means making a strategic choice towards victory!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Deerfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and emotional trauma that a dog bite injury can inflict on an individual. We are committed to guiding you through the complexities of Illinois law to ensure you receive the necessary compensation for your hardship.

Dog bites can lead to various injuries, some minor and others significantly severe causing debilitating consequences. These include but are not limited to puncture wounds, lacerations, fractures, tissue loss, nerve damage or even psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The severity is often dependent on several factors including the breed of dog involved and their size.

It’s important to comprehend how liability in dog bite cases works under Illinois law. Essentially, it holds an ‘unlimited strict liability’, placing sole responsibility on the owner of the offending animal. They cannot evict responsibility by asserting they had no prior knowledge that their pet was dangerous or was never previously aggressive.

• If a dog has caused an attack without provocation

• If a victim was conducting themselves peacefully

• If an incident occurred in places where victims were allowed legally

Under such circumstances portrayed above, based on Section 16 of Chapter 510 Act 5/16 – Animal Control Act, owners will be held liable for any consequent damages suffered by innocent victims.

The aftermath of dog bites may exert considerable financial strain due to high medical costs incurred from rabies vaccinations, reconstructive surgery (in serious cases), medication and physical therapy expenses – all required for optimal recovery. Further hidden costs like lost wages from off-work period during recovery phases add salt further into this wound that you should not bear alone without recompense.

Our team prioritizes equipping clients with pertinent knowledge about their legal rights spanning medical treatment reimbursements down unraveling insurance company tactics- a tool purposed for exploiting unaware claimants against receiving deserved larger pay-outs which often results typically in smaller settlements than clients would ideally merit initially given proper legal counsel representation.

The physical and emotional turmoil that accompanies a dog bite injury can not be overstated. At Carlson Bier, we are committed to ensuring that you receive the care and compensation that you require. Our knowledgeable attorneys will guide you every step of the way, offering support when it’s most needed.

There is absolutely no need for you to navigate these troubled waters alone. We believe firmly in your right to justice, extending our readiness to fight tirelessly on behalf of justice-deserving clients like you against parties inclined for cheap settlements than issuing out rightful compensations independently under Illinoian Law provisions.

Experiencing a personal injury incident such as a dog bite can be stressful and confusing. However, with the right legal guidance from professional lawyers at Carlson Bier, we take this burden off your shoulder- making sure every box is ticked toward attaining satisfaction journey recovery-wise.

Navigating through an unfamiliar legal terrain post-injury needs proficiency; where more damages result if errors persist during claim submission periods causing lower payouts or if escalation ensuring full recompense remains unchallenged.

Don’t let yourself fall victim twice. Stand up now! Cease being exploited further by insurance corporations chance lets go unchecked without due representation aboard anchoring deserved fair treatment protected within Illinois laws expressly stipulated to shield victims efficiently towards achieving requisite compensation validly weighed ‘Law sheep balances’.

Serve justice rightfully; recover financially today rather existing between lines lacking adequate representation solely designed voicing out significantly important elements sunk silence detrimental ones’ financial recovery journey geared optimally cushioning blows resultant dog-bite unfortunate incidences setting on a path vibrant promise serenity stability finally realized fully intended purposeively behind protective regulations guarding tort claims initiating correct implementation process balanced remarkable counsel provision inclusive best-suited attorney leaders practicing exclusively law firm-Carlson Bier group

Please click on the button below to find out how much your case could potentially worth admissible before law courts confidently assured excellent capable hands expertly poised achieving triumphantly on your behalf unabatedly bathing under a deserving client glow allowing us journey you holding hand. Let justice prevail today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Deerfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Deerfield

Areas of Practice in Deerfield

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Giving professional legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal help for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding clients of car accidents get appropriate settlement for harms and damages.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering adept legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Committed to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440