FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Edgewater

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dog bite injuries occur in Edgewater, the qualified professional assistance of Carlson Bier is essential. With a sterling reputation founded on years of dedicated personal injury practice within Illinois, they are unmatched when it comes to securing just compensation for dog bite victims. They view each case from a personalized perspective and zealously advocate on behalf of their clients until justice has been served. Dog bites can inflict severe physical and emotional trauma – a delay or lack in proper legal representation should not be an additional pain suffered by victims. Utilizing every resource available under Illinois law, Carlson Bier ensures that each client’s rights are upheld and appropriately compensated for medical bills, loss wages if unable to work due to injury etc., even pain and suffering caused by these unfortunate incidents.The integrity embodied by the team at Carlson Bier marks them as invaluable allies amidst your pursuit for justice after an upsetting incident with canine aggression – entrust your case to their experienced hands.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Edgewater Illinois

When it comes to personal injury cases, the legal experts at Carlson Bier understand that every situation is distinct. In particular, our law firm focuses on instances of dog bite injuries in Illinois which often present their own unique challenges and complexities. We navigate you through the legalities entailed while ensuring maximum value for your claim.

Dog bites can lead to severe trauma or even permanent damage. These events are not only physically draining but emotionally harrowing too. It’s crucial that victims understand their rights within the context of Illinois law and how they can seek justice.

The ‘Animal Control Act’ in Illinois clearly outlines that if a dog or other animal attacks without provocation, the owner of such animal is liable for damages suffered by the one attacked. So as a victim, you have strong legal grounds for compensation.

There are key aspects about Dog Bite Injuries under the Illinois law that everyone should be aware of:

• Liability: According to Section 16 of Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/16), when a dog attacks another person unprovoked on public property or while being legally on private property including property owned by the owner of such dog, then the owner becomes strictly liable.

• Legal Responsibility: The statute considers pet owners responsible for their pets’ behavior with complete disregard for whether the pet had shown prior viciousness or whether the owner had knowledge about such viciousness.

• Damages: A successful claim could cover medical bills incurred from treating injuries sustained from a said incident. This includes doctor visits, medication costs, physical therapy fees among others. Along with this, one might also get compensation for pain & suffering caused by irreversible psychological distress due to physical scars or disfigurement.

As specialized lawyers in personal injury matters pertaining specifically to dog bites in Illinois, Carlson Bier understands these specifications like no other attorney group does. Through focused strategy and detailed planning we aim at delivering rightful justice while emphasizing our client’s overall well-being.

Understanding your claim value is another aspect that sets us apart in this domain. When we discuss dog bite injury cases, we dive deep into the intricacies of each legal provision and work out a clear strategy to help arrive at an appropriate compensation range for you.

Victims often endure prolonged physical discomfort, psychological distress and financial stress making it essential to seek professional aid when dealing with complex legal dynamics of dog bite injuries. Your choice of attorney can dramatically affect your case outcome so we encourage you to reach out to specialists like Carlson Bier who fully comprehend the depth and breadth of personal injury laws.

Experience, professionalism & commitment are just some of the traits which define our attorneys at Carlson Bier. Expertise coupled with detailed attention towards every single case has made us adept over several years in servicing clients victimized by dog bites across Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, we pledge strong advocacy on behalf of dog bite victims. We understand the distress you’re currently going through, but rest assured, you aren’t alone in this journey. Our team will tirelessly fight to obtain maximum possible compensation under Illinois laws ensuring that justice is served righteously.

Transparency is also something our firm offers without compromise. You’ll always be informed about every step taken pertaining to your case till its final resolution under utmost confidentiality.

We sincerely hope that our dedication toward achieving favorable results never puts you in a position where reaching out becomes necessary again yet if circumstances demand such actions then remember that help is only a consultation away.

By clicking on the button below you can find how much your case could potentially yield as per initial analysis by esteemed professionals from Carlson Bier, No obligation! As one of Illinois’ most reputable personal injury law firms advocating within Dog Bite injuries ambit- Gaining justice isn’t far away! Unlock potential case worth today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Edgewater Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Edgewater

Areas of Practice in Edgewater

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing expert legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Extending specialist legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, extending expert legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Slip Accidents

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Providing expert legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Head Harms

Focused on extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for patients with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440