...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fairbury

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate incidents such as dog bite injuries occur in Fairbury, Carlson Bier is the beacon of hope for swift and comprehensive legal recourse. Renowned as a leading personal injury lawyer firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier brings its sterling reputation to bear in each unique dog-bite case. The attorneys understand the physical and emotional trauma you may be experiencing after such an incident. They specialize in securing compensation commensurate with your distress and meticulous medical evaluation ensuring no circumstance is overlooked. While implementing strategies that navigate complex legal landscapes, they empower your voice against pet owners or insurance companies who find multiple facets to minimize their liability while leaving victims desolate. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing not only expertise but also empathy towards dog bite victims; it’s about creating precedents that promote responsibility over complacency within our lives co-existing with pets.

Trust them for unparalleled dedication because at Carlton Bier, compassion does more than just personalize service – it ensures justice isn’t merely served but rightfully deserved!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fairbury Illinois

Carlson Bier is a respected law firm based in Illinois that specializes in offering legal services to clients who have been victims of personal injury incidents. A distinct area where Carlson Bier has significant expertise is Dog Bite Injuries. These injuries are viewed delicately due to their sensitive nature, as they often involve not only physical trauma but emotional and psychological distress as well.

A dog bite can result in various types of damages, primarily:

• Physical harm: This includes infections, scarring, loss of limb function, or death in extreme cases;

• Psychological anguish: Anxiety and a fear of dogs may develop after such an incident;

• Financial difficulties: Including medical bills,future treatment costs and the potential for lost wages if you need time off work while recovering.

At Carlson Bier, we understand these complexities profoundly and therefore strive to attain justice for our clients by holding the negligent parties accountable.

Every impending case begins with the details surrounding the dog breath incident. More so, appropriate understanding of these events allows for effective representation when pursuing your claim. Therefore, knowing the circumstances precedes all else:

• Was the attack unprovoked?

• Did it occur on public property or while legally on private property?

• Was there negligence involved on part of the pet owner?

By analyzing these points carefully and taking into account all available information regarding the incidence will allow for stronger case building.

Another aspect worth noting involves laws associated with dog bite injuries within Illinois which greatly impact how claims are presented and pursued legally. Unlike many other states that follow “one free bite” rule- exempting owners from liability if their pet had never shown vicious tendencies before – Illinois applies a strict liability rule regarding dog bites makingowners responsible irrespective of former behavior patterns exhibited by their pets. However, this shifts when a victim provoked a dog intentionally or was illegally trespassing at the time of incidence reflecting contributory negligence on partof the victim diminishing compensation possibilities. Navigating these laws can be overwhelming which is why engaging an experienced personal injury attorney is imperative.

At Carlson Bier, our specific knowledge of dog bite law coupled with our experience in personal injury cases will provide an unparalleled level of assistance as you seek retribution and compensation. We understand that litigation can present unexpected twists and turns. However, rest assured knowing that we are fully prepared to handle those complexities passionately while maintaining your best interests at the forefront.

Your healing, recovery and wellbeing should remain undisputed priorities after experiencing a traumatizing incident like a dog bite. Our legal guidance ensures your focus remains intact on these areas by professionally managing all legal aspects associated with filing claims along with addressing possible negotiations or court procedures.Thereby enabling notable relief to victims who already shoulder substantial burdens regarding their health,safety and financial stability post incidents.Carlson Bier’s efficient approach harbours trustworthiness makingow undoubtedly form beneficial relationships because we deeply care about achieving positive outcomes for our clients.

With this wealth of information within your grasp, don’t let yourself become further burdened by navigating the legalities alone during an already stressful period. Engage Carlson Bier’s professional services immediately following any dog bite incident; allow us to lighten your load so that you can prioritize your physical and emotional healing. If you wish to learn more about how much your case could potentially be worth, click the button below to further explore options tailored expressly for your needs.Offering invaluable dedication , expertise and compassion -at Carlson Bier,you do matter extensively! Always count on us for comprehensive support throughout this challenging journey towards justice regularization.A step taken today towards rightful restoration also signifies victory for tomorrows yet unfought!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairbury Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fairbury

Areas of Practice in Fairbury

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering specialist legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Providing professional legal representation for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal services to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents get fair recompense for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Traumas

Committed to delivering specialized legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Trauma

Dedicated to assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​