...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fulton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one has been subject to a vicious dog bite injury in Fulton, Carlson Bier is your optimal choice for comprehensive legal assistance. Our practiced team specializes in handling such claims throughout Illinois, arming us with the essential knowledge to guide you through every step of the process. Having an experienced Dog Bite Injuries attorney from our firm on your side could dramatically increase chances of receiving necessary compensation. Carlson Bier brings unique commitment and dedication that isn’t just limited to courtroom representation; we are steadfast advocates for our clients’ rights from day one with full understanding of Illinois statute all around such cases. We display meticulous attention to details while compassionately demanding justice for each case defended passionately by team members with years of collective practice behind them, customer sharings fortifying their seriousness about serving unwaveringly against flaws that led unsuspectingly into misfortunate incidents-no matter the level complexity attached thereto. Trusting Carlson Bier means aligning yourself not only with competence but also uncompromised legal integrity pertinent towards resolving Dog Bite Injury disputes commendably alike.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fulton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our foremost priority is the protection of rights for victims of personal injuries. As established personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we strive to offer comprehensive insights into different types of injury incidents our clients might encounter. One such occurrence that we feel should be given particular attention is Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bites can result in severe injuries and emotional trauma. Not just physical wounds but the aftermath could also include psychological distress, fear, or discomfort around animals. It’s important to understand that under Illinois law, owners are liable for their pets’ behavior. If you’re a dog bite victim suffering due to someone else’s negligence, it’s paramount that you know your right to compensation.

• Owners are fully responsable for their dogs: Under the ‘Animal Control Act’ in Illinois law, pet owners bear full responsibility if their animal inflicts harm on another human without provocation while they’re out public or legally within private property.

• There doesn’t need to be prior dangerous behaviour: A common misapprehension with dog bite cases is that the affected person must prove that the animal had demonstrated dangerous behavior earlier before they were bitten which isn’t accurate.

• You may claim damages even if the owner wasn’t negligent: Even if an owner took reasonable care to restrain their pet or prevent it from causing harm, they can potentially still be held responsible in case of a dog bite incident.

Further significant elements involve understanding what damages you may be entitled to after being subjected to a dog bite injury:

• Medical Expenses: This includes all costs associated with medical treatment following your dog bite—doctor visits, hospitalization costs, medication expenses etc.

• Lost Wages: If your injury resulted in time off work or diminished your ability to earn as much—a loss of profits claim could potentially recuperate those losses.

• Pain and Suffering: If evidence shows considerable pain endured or lasting phobia developed because of an attack, claims for emotional and physical discomfort can be made.

• Property Damage: If any personal items like clothing, glasses etc. were destroyed during the incident, you are entitled to pursue compensation.

Overcoming a dog bite injury can be as much of an emotionally demanding ordeal as it is physically excruciating. It’s essential to have competent legal guidance helping you navigate through this process. At Carlson Bier, we have extensive experience representing personal injury victims—including those who’ve suffered from dog bites. We understand fundamental Illinois laws related to your case, as well as factors that influence damage amounts in such lawsuits.

Navigating turbulence caused by a traumatic event may feel overwhelming; however, with robust support and expert advice on your side from experienced attorneys, claiming your rightful compensation gets significantly more manageable. Your recovery journey doesn’t need to be solitary or financially taxing—at Carlson Bier, our commitment lies in aiding clients’ quest for justice swiftly and effectively while ensuring they’re informed at every step of the way.

Each case is unique and requires individual assessment—even if two incidents might appear identical externally—the implications could differ vastly due to countless variables involved. Henceforth why understanding what your exact situation means when measured against Illinois Law could be game-changing for your case outcome.

At this point—should you want expert insights into what can specifically apply within your context—you’re one simple click away! Tap the button below and gain knowledge about what your claim’s true worth might look like under bona fide legal examination. Take the first step towards restitution—the power rests right at your fingertips! Let us help you analyze and ascertain precisely how much value lies hidden behind various dimensions of your particular circumstances – because no victim should get less than they truly deserve!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fulton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fulton

Areas of Practice in Fulton

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Extending professional legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering expert legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Stumble Mishaps

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending specialist legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Specializing in supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​