...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Galva

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a spinal cord injury, you’re faced with numerous overwhelming, life-altering challenges. For the victims residing in Galva seeking legal guidance – Carlson Bier is your most trusted ally. We are known not just for our unwavering commitment to clients but also for securing maximum compensation on their behalf. Our team consists of highly-qualified attorneys who specialize in spinal cord injuries with decades of experience dealing with complex personal injury cases throughout Illinois. At Carlson Bier, we heavily invest in cutting-edge resources combined with intricate knowledge of state laws ensuring exceptional representation and navigating the path ahead confidently amidst adversity. This is what sets us apart from other firms: an exhaustive understanding of our practice areas coupled with unparalleled dedication towards every case handled by keeping client interests at forefront and crafting personalized strategies around them Its this exemplary approach that makes Carlson Bier stand out as a preferred choice for those seeking counsel related to Spinal Cord Injuries in Galva.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Galva Illinois

Understanding the gravity and implications of spinal cord injuries is crucial in any personal injury case. At Carlson Bier, we are experts in handling such intricacies that relate to your spine injury claim. Our experienced team of personal injury attorneys has represented clients with various kinds of spinal cord injuries throughout Illinois over decades, setting us apart as a paramount figure in this legal terrain.

Spinal cord injuries involve any damage to the spinal nerves or their pathways that can lead to life-changing consequences. These damages frequently result from slip and fall accidents, motor vehicle incidents, workplace mishaps, sporting incidents or violent encounters. Such injuries are categorized into two major types – complete and incomplete.

Complete Spinal Cord Injuries cause total loss of sensory function below the level of injury whereas Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries leave some functionality intact below the area affected. Despite these impacts on physical ability, it’s vital to remember there is life after a spinal injury. By working with medical professionals who offer advanced therapies alongside legally navigating your rights to compensation, you can continue living positively and independently post-injury.

It’s also critical to be aware that victims with these significant impairments often face hefty expenses for treatment which usually extend far beyond initial medical bills summing up in extensive hospital stays or surgeries required immediately post-incident:

• Ongoing Rehabilitation: Physiotherapy sessions along with potential occupational therapy services

• Medical Equipment: Wheelchairs, walking aids etc.

• Home Adjustments: Necessary changes made for accessibility

• Future Care: Routine check-ups particularly complicated if additional issues linked to spinal injuries arise – infections or respiratory problems

• Miscellaneous Costs: Travel expenditures for specialist appointments; increased utility bills because of spending more time at home due to disability

Recovering fair compensation becomes invaluable especially when combined cost mounts undoubtedly under such circumstances.

At Carlson Bier recognizing intricate aspects involved helps us determine both parties’ at fault leading up to accident as well as potential future implications of client’s traumatic event. This comprehension, in turn, aids to calculate rightful compensation ensuring it encompasses everything from loss of earning while injured to long-term financial security as part of personal injury legal claims.

As Illinois law stipulates, we trepidly avoid advertising an office location that isn’t physically existing. Our firm is centrally located and operates out of multiple established practices across the state enabling us capable of extending our services all over Illinois whilst remaining compliant with said legislations.

Navigating the daunting path post a spinal cord injury need not be an isolated journey; you’re entitled to have experts advocating for your rights. If you or a loved one has been dealing with such a devastating injury, Carlson Bier aims at propelling this advocacy allowing you respite amidst medical jargon and legally technical terminologies.

It’s equally prudent when opting for professional law enforcement representation that you choose attorneys with extensive expertise in handling cases correlating Spinal Cord injuries – acquiring targeted strategies rather than generalist approaches tend to yield far more significant outcomes preferably on negotiation tables even before reaching courtrooms which saves on potential additional costs & emotional stresses linked specifically with trials.

Your journey doesn’t stop here.We can help evaluate how much your case could potentially be worth based on our enriched experience in this specialized area offering personalized advice aiding navigate through post-spinal injuries compensatory claim complexities. To take the first step towards understanding your rights and venturing into recovering what exactly you are owed, click on the button below now! Asserting rights could never get easier- Carlson Bier is right beside supporting each courageous stride towards reclaiming life after Spinal Cord Injuries.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Galva Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Galva

Areas of Practice in Galva

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering expert legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing expert legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering adept legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents obtain just compensation for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring expert legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Traumas

Specializing in offering expert legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in supporting individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​