...

Car Accident Attorney in Hamilton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Hamilton and find yourself ensnared by unfortunate events of a car accident, quick legal assistance from the reliable Carlson Bier law firm can help ease your path towards assured fortune. With special expertise in addressing complex cases such as auto accidents, their remarkable personal injury lawyers exhibit extensive understanding of Illinois’ traffic regulations, liability laws and insurance protocols. Carlson Bier’s proven discussion strategies with stingy insurers guarantee an optimal claim analysis which has helped numerous Hamilton residents obtain rightful compensation covering medical bills, property damage or lost wages. Their meticulous research practices coupled with vigorous negotiation efforts brought many clients the recovery freedoms they deserved—snapshots of this law firm’s client-centric paradigm that prioritizes victims’ needs over any other factor. Regardless where you live, we firmly believe that justice should be both accessible and prompt; hence our commitment to advocating for injured individuals in Hamilton, ensuring the best-case outcome on every single trial.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Hamilton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our primary goal as personal injury attorneys is to assist you in understanding the complex legal elements surrounding car accidents while providing exceptional legal representation in Illinois. More than just representing clients, we believe in the power of education as a tool for empowerment. Car accident lawsuits can be quite challenging owing to factors such as determining fault, proving negligence and quantifying damages yet these need not be daunting with appropriate guidance.

A broad understanding of car accident law includes several key facets that are essential during any lawsuit proceedings. The first salient factor would be the issue of Negligence. This principle refers to conduct that falls below the standards of behavior considered reasonable or safe under particular circumstances; it’s imperative in almost every personal injury case, including those involving motor vehicle collisions.

Secondly, keep in mind Illinois’s ‘Comparative Fault’ rule which acknowledges the possibility of multiple parties being at fault for an accident. Under this doctrine even if you were partially responsible for your own injuries from a collision, you could potentially still recover some level of compensation – though it will likely be reduced according to your percentage of blame established by court.

Moreover, one must also understand insurance claims and tactics employed by insurance companies after an accident. Insurance firms often deploy strategies aimed at minimizing payout amounts or denying claims outright unseen by common people like us but Carlson Bier group has vast experience dealing with orgs and parsing their convoluted lingo.

Lastly, effectively defining Damages is crucial to claim adequate compensation. Damages refer both to bodily harm and property damage inflicted due to others’ negligence on roadways along with many non-physical damages like emotional distress or loss of consortium without forgetting monetary costs incurred such as medical bills or lost wages post mishap – all these components require scrupulous presentation before courts.

Deeper knowledge about each part helps victims navigate their cases more confidently alongside ensuring their rights are optimally protected throughout the process—which is why our experts are dedicated to providing clear, comprehensive information that is easy to understand.

As a diligent group of attorneys located in Illinois, Carlson Bier is here for you every step of the way on this arduous path. We remain committed to your cause till justice has been duly served from analyzing accurate fault determination and deal with aggressive insurance companies’ bad faith practices to compiling an unerring list of damages borne by our clients entirely – Our team’s professional expertise provides a strong foundation against any challenges along trenches.

Given the complexities usually associated with car accident cases, retaining proficient legal representation is vital and can pave the way for an equitable outcome. Keeping transparency at its core, we extend assistance even before initiating formal proceedings – guiding your steps in critical immediate actions following collision like gathering evidence or procuring needed medical care etc., which crucially aids court cases later. Building trust through diligence and professionalism forms part of our ethos as guardians of rights since last many decades.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that knowledge not only empowers but also fortifies through understanding reducing uncertainties caused by injuries or damages recieved during accidents aside giving clarity on necessary recovery aspects. Recognizing this inclusive ideology allows us better engagement between all parties involved thereby streamlining process towards optimized resolution.

To harness potential benefits powered by 30 year long experiences fighting diverse range cases spread across Illinois right today without any obligation, click below button now; get surprised assessing worth which might be owed for devastation suffered due automobile collision beyond expected lines completely free! Let Carlson Bier light up darkened corners; take first decided step towards closure awaiting one end destiny compelled journey had embarked upon unintended big flash!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hamilton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hamilton

Areas of Practice in Hamilton

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing expert legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Offering professional legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Incident

Offering specialist legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Building Accidents

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Focused on delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on assisting individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer