Bicycle Accidents in Hawthorn Woods

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unexpected occurs, like a bicycle accident in Hawthorn Woods, Carlson Bier is the legal team you can trust. Our attorneys have established a solid reputation with their extensive experience and commitment to justice for personal injury victims. Specialists in dealing with bicycle accidents, we competently navigate intricate legal processes ensuring clients receive fair compensation. At Carlson Bier, our goal lies beyond just winning cases; it’s about rebuilding lives invariably disrupted by these incidents. Every case undertaken is approached meticulously; every detail scrutinized to secure favorable outcomes that shadow mere financial victories. Our tailored guidance ensures we are always there when needed most, delivering each case closure with respect and dignity deserved by all our clients. With an undeniable command of Illinois law and unrelenting tenacity to champion client rights no matter what odds stand against them – count on Carlson Bier as your preferred choice for professional consultation after your bike mishap in Hawthorn Woods’ vicinities.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Hawthorn Woods Illinois

At Carlson Bier, dedicated personal injury attorneys based in the heart of Illinois, we understand the intricacies and repercussions of bicycle accidents. As a premier law firm championing victims’ rights, our mission extends beyond mere legal representation; we prioritize your understanding of every facet involved to ensure informed decision-making at all stages.

Bicycle accidents can result in terribly debilitating injuries which may have lifelong consequences. When these occur through no fault of your own but due to others’ negligence or reckless behavior, it is unjust for you to bear the medical expenses and massive emotional toll alone. As empathetic yet fiercely determined advocates, we fight relentlessly for your rightful compensation.

In-depth knowledge regarding integral aspects such as driver liability, cyclist’s responsibility, types of damages attainable along with pertinent state laws make a notable difference in amplifying the strength of your claim. By aiding you in appropriately navigating this challenging path laden with legal nuances specific to bicyclists’ rights within Illinois jurisprudence, we strive to optimize outcomes on your behalf.

Key highlights revolving around bicycle accident cases include:

• Determination Of Fault: To ascertain who must compensate for resulting losses from an accident;

• Understanding The ImpactOf Comparative Negligence In Illinois: This framework allows partial recovery even if the cyclist was partially at fault.

• Comprehending ‘Duty Of Care’: Drivers are required by law to avoid harming others including cyclists.

• Role Of Traffic Laws: Breach might indicate negligence & increase chances for damages.

Armed with extensive experience litigating a wide range of bicycle incident claims inclusive widespread scenarios – like being door-checked by parked vehicles or ignored at intersections – cement our credibility as proficient plaintiff representatives distinctively attuned to cater individual case needs.

It’s critical that any injured cyclist understands their right to fair remuneration covering elements like current-and-future medical bills, pain-and-suffering plus diminutive capacity pertaining daily activities/work missed during healing process or deteriorated career prospects due to sustained harm. Harnessing our adroit proficiency garnered over years specializing within this specific legal sphere, we methodically examine every accident’s aftermath particularly nuanced by involved parties & precise circumstances of incidents.

Being thoroughly invested within client welfare dictates that we be prepared to weather the storm for you – whether it involves holding negligent motorists accountable, combating insurance firms hell-bent upon reducing claim payouts or even facing off against government entities responsible for unsafe road designs/conditions.

By choosing Carlson Bier to champion your cause, you enter a pact that entitles you not just to aggressive representation but also comprehensive support during an inevitably traumatic period in life. We shall tirelessly traverse vast evidence mountains while mitigating risks for you by filtering propositions unfitting original merit summation prior to litigation’s initiation. Besides multilingual staff enhancing all-rounded inclusivity promoting smoother legal journeys as demanded by diverse Illinois communities, each claim entrusted unto us receives meticulous attention diligent lawyers renowned for crafting compelling arguments ensuring rightful compensation reclamation.

Take charge today by clicking the button below and find out exactly how much your case might be worth through our free consultation services offering comprehensive guidance propelling progress towards sought-after justice. Overcoming adversity can be daunting alongside possible intimidating adversaries comprising potent bureaucratic machinery; let Carlson Bier soothe those worries granting deserved respite amidst challenging times via steadfast dedication achieving success fortifying brighter futures nurtured beyond unfortunate past occurrences.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hawthorn Woods Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hawthorn Woods

Areas of Practice in Hawthorn Woods

Bicycle Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Slip Injuries

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents secure equitable payout for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Committed to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring professional legal advice for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Focused on delivering professional legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Death

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Committed to representing individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer