...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Highland Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from the traumatic effects of a dog bite injury? Trust in the experience and dedication of Carlson Bier, your reliable source for astute legal representation. Our seasoned attorneys focus competently on cases involving dog bite injuries across Illinois, helping victims secure justice. Understanding the nuances that govern each city, including Highland Park regulations, is our specialty to make certain you are compensated fully and justly.

With Carlson Bier at your side, we relentlessly work towards getting you back on track after such an unfortunate incident. Utilizing a strategic approach tailored uniquely for your case ensures optimal results while maintaining empathy and respect towards the client throughout this distressing event.

Our team understands what’s legally expected: medical costs coverage by owners following an unprovoked attack from their pet dogs; compensation sought often spans beyond physical wounds to cover psychological trauma as well. Through intricate knowledge matched with compassionate service delivery makes Carlson Bier an excellent choice when seeking justice against those responsible for causing dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Highland Park Illinois

Carlson Bier is a renowned law group in Illinois, specializing in personal injuries resulting from various instances such as dog bite cases. At our firm, we understand the trauma and unfortunate circumstances that arise from a dog bite. Hence, our knowledgeable team of personal injury attorneys work diligently to provide robust representation for your case.

Dog bite injuries can vary greatly, ranging from minor nips to severe attacks causing traumatic physical harm. Such incidents unveil several complex aspects encompassing legalities, animal rights and public safety measures. Based on Illinois law, defined by the Animal Control Act, you have the right to claim compensation if you’ve suffered an injury caused by someone else’s pet or specifically in this instance – a dog.

• The owner shall be held liable if the victim was acting peaceably

• The liability lies with the owner even when their dog was off-leash outside their property.

• If provocation isn’t proven against the injured party

At Carlson Bier, we operate cognizant of these considerations which aids us in navigating through your case efficiently while aggressively advocating for your rights.

In many scenarios, victims overlook essential factors about their situation that could significantly impact their entitlements because they lack pertinent knowledge on this subject matter. We believe it’s vital to take note of these factors:

– The severity and consequent medical implications of your injuries

– Lost wages due to absenteeism at work

– Possible future medical costs associated with your recovery

– Psychological trauma experienced as a result of being attacked

Rest assured; at Carlson Bier our skilled attorneys will perform thorough investigations into all these facets while advising you accordingly based on our extensive experience in personal injury law.

The aftermath of a dog bite typically results in more than just physical pain; emotional distress can come underway often leading to post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD). Our expert team acknowledges such subtle experiences that are usually disregarded yet may play an enormous role towards comprehending the full impact of your circumstances. Even as we represent you, our priority is that justice gets served, ensuring the compensation received leaves you adequately compensated for your physical and emotional suffering.

Handling these cases ourselves certainly adds a layer of empathy and commitment towards our clients. We comprehend how convoluted it can be to manage insurance companies who often look to avoid paying compensation or delay the procedures which could potentially harm your chances of fair remuneration. This frequently results in victims settling for less than their case deserves due to frustration and foresight on untimely justice being served. By allowing us to intervene on your behalf, we shall diligently liaise with all involved parties persistently pushing for an apt resolution.

When selecting Carlson Bier, you are choosing more than just support; you are opting for dedicated representation from a group invested in championing your rights while ensuring efficient pursuit of compensatory relief pertinent to your circumstances. It may seem like a long daunting journey right now, but with our proficient team by your side, consider the burden half lifted.

As every dog bite injury bears unique details and consequences that influence its worth, obtaining an accurate estimation of what your case could be worth necessitates trusted professional insight. Click on the button below to consult one-on-one with one of our seasoned personal injury attorneys whose expertise will yield valuable guidance tailored specifically to your situation’s hitches and prospects. Let us walk this journey together while providing diligent legal service worthy of both merit and trust.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Highland Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Highland Park

Areas of Practice in Highland Park

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving skilled legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Stumble Injuries

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Accident

Ensuring adept legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Expert in ensuring expert legal representation for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​